Makrell
Norway is an important faction at the time
Important compared to what?
the king of Norway captured a lot of land in britania, and controlled all the hebrides, man, Orkney and a bunch of Ulster in his reign.
at the height of Norways power, when Norway owned Greenland, some of north america, Iceland entire present day Norway + a lot of Sweden and the islands around britian,
I hate to disappoint you, but "a lot of land" doesn't mean it's any good. Importance of territories depends on variety of factors: population density, urbanization level, agriculture, natural resources, accessibility to important trade routes, geopolitical position and much more.
As we see, almost all territories Norway controlled were either poor and unpopulated (Greenland, Iceland) or of low geopolitical importance far away from any trade or military routes.
You are correct, and Norway did do a lot of trade at the time, even though it meight be of "less" importance compared to superpowers such as Byzantine, Burgundy and the Abbazids.
I would suggest moving the map further north if possible, so that Iceland Northern Norway and Greenland are added.
And what about other kingdoms and lands? Serbia, Burgundy, Bohemia, Navarre, Armenia, Georgia, Abassids? Why are they of less importance? Oh, I get it - they were no match compared to mighty and world-dominating Norway. Of course. Let me guess - you are from Norway.
Yes i am, but i say Norway is not necessarily more important than those, i am not well read in eastern european history but Norway did have an impact on the world at the time.
It would really help the gameplay and give Norway the might it deserves
I've got a better idea! Let's delete Byzantine Empire and Kingdom of France (they are tiny and absolutely insignificant anyway) and add Iceland and Greenland! And there should be at least 6 or 7 regions in Greenland alone! That would be so much fun!
That does sound fun, but i think lųast kingdom is doing that sorta already, and they have already modified the map
Seriously, this kind of nationalistic egoism doesn't even need to be parodied.