Results 1 to 20 of 25

Thread: Romans and Alpine celts

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Romans and Alpine celts

    Hi.

    This post is not particulary about EBII, although it has something to do with EB time frame. I just wanted to do know what you guys think about it, anyway if i dont want to cause any trouble so if feel free to move or close the topic if it´s not supposed to be here. Thx
    Sorry for my bad english.

    ---
    Recent genetic data suggests that ancient Italic tribes, including the Romans, were closely related to the Alpine Celts who founded the Hallstatt and La Tène cultures. In other words, the Romans conquest of Gaul was more like the final part of the unification process of the Italo-Celtic tribes.

    Genetic evidence

    The S28/U152 SNP was discovered as a subclade of haplogroup R1b about 2 years ago and tests have become more widespread over the last year. The original trend seem to point at a Celtic origin for this haplogroup, with a possible origin in the Black Forest or Switzerland.

    R1b-S28 was found in the area of extension of the La Tene culture, along the Rhine, Moselle and Meuse valleys north to Belgium, around the Alps in Eastern France (Lorraine, Vosges, Jura, and maybe as far as Auvergne), and in northern Italy, known as Cisalpine Gaul by the Romans. The haplogroup was also observed at lower frequency in Britain, which is compatible with the establishment of Belgic tribes there prior to the Roman conquest.

    But it now appears that R1b-S28 is also the most common subclade of R1b in Italy, even in the south and in Sardinia. It could indeed be the original haplogroup of the Italic tribes, prior to the arrival of the Etruscans, the Greeks and the Phoenicians.

    The coalescence age for R1b-S28 haplotypes is around 3,500 years ago, about 1,000 years before the beginning of the European Bronze Age. This makes it possible for a common origin of the Alpine Celts and Italic tribes. Little is known of the Italics before the mythical foundation of Rome in 753 BCE.

    In all likelihood, the ancestor of all/most R1b-S28 people lived in the Western Hallstatt culture, around the Black Forest. This happens to be the place where the highest STR diversity is found for this haplogroup, which usually means that it is the place of origin.

    Linguistic evidence

    This theory is further corroborated by linguistic evidence. Italic and Celtic languages belonged to the same Italo-Celtic family. It is known that at the time of Julius Caesar Gaulish dialects were still mutually intelligible with Latin, meaning that the two linguistic groups had not split so long ago.

    Archeological evidence

    Archeological evidence suggest that the Italics may not have colonised the Italian peninsula before 1,000 BCE. The nearest and most probable place of origin of the Italics was the Alps region, where the Hallstatt culture (1,200-475 BCE) flourished.

    This would explain why Roman helmets and other military equipment, were directly inspired by Alpine Celtic ones.

    The Romans became more technologically and culturally advanced than their northern cousins thanks to the influence of their Near-Eastern neighbours, the Etruscans (immediately north of Rome) and the Greeks (to the south). The Romans combined the best elements of Celtic and Greco-Etruscan culture and technology to become a superpower.

    The Celts were said to be fiercer warriors than the Greeks, who were themselves stronger than the Persians (they never let themselves conquered, even in the heyday of Darius and Xerxes). Even Alexander the Great feared the Alpine/Danubian Celts, and made sure to secure peace with them before setting off to conquer the Middle East. The Celts invaded Greece a few decades after Alexander's death, and sacked Delphi in 279 BCE. Those were the same Alpine Celts that had sacked Rome in 390 BCE, and besieged it again in 367 BCE.

    Until the 3rd century, the Alpine Celts were the strongest military power in Europe, and the fastest expanding culture. The La Tène culture spread well beyond Gaul and Italy, to Iberia, Britain, the Balkans and Anatolia.

    If the Romans were in fact close relatives of those Celts, equipped with the Greek advances in agriculture, ship-building, military strategy, and political structure, it is no wonder that they defeated everybody else so easily.

    Roman relations with their Alpine Celtic cousins

    Many Eastern Gaulish tribes (e.g. Sequani. Aedui) allied themselves to Julius Caesar during the Conquest of Gaul. In fact they had long had good relations with Rome and were the ones who requested Caesar's assistance to fight other tribes. Before Caesar's time the Aedui had attached themselves to the Romans, and were honoured with the title of brothers and kinsmen of the Roman people. Perhaps it is no wonder that the Romans had the hardest time defeating the tribes closest to them, the Suebi and the Belgae.

    This also explains why the Romans called the Suebi and other Celts of modern south-west Germany the "Germani". The Latin Germani comes from germanus (from germen, "seed" or "offshoot"). The term was used to mean that they were the genuine Celts (descendants of the Hallstatt and La Tène Celts), as opposed to the other tribes of Gaul. Or it meant that they, Romans, descended from the same "seed" as these Germani from the Black Forest, or saw each others as offshoots of the same tribe.

    The Roman provinces of Germania match exactly the regions where R1b-S28 has the highest frequency, around modern Belgium (Germania Inferior), and around the Baden-Württemberg (Germania Superior).

  2. #2

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine celts

    What are your sources?

    Also, some of the middle paragraps might require further explanation. Because if left unchanged or not explained for context's sake, they might sound dangerously close to fan-wank. I'm referring this part:
    The Celts were said to be fiercer warriors than the Greeks, who were themselves stronger than the Persians (they never let themselves conquered, even in the heyday of Darius and Xerxes). Even Alexander the Great feared the Alpine/Danubian Celts, and made sure to secure peace with them before setting off to conquer the Middle East. The Celts invaded Greece a few decades after Alexander's death, and sacked Delphi in 279 BCE. Those were the same Alpine Celts that had sacked Rome in 390 BCE, and besieged it again in 367 BCE.

    [...]

    If the Romans were in fact close relatives of those Celts, equipped with the Greek advances in agriculture, ship-building, military strategy, and political structure, it is no wonder that they defeated everybody else so easily.

    Oh and welcome to the forum.

  3. #3
    Dan Rares's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Iasi , Romania
    Posts
    139

    Icon10 Re: Romans and Alpine celts

    Also we can say the Romans are Thracians .
    We all now the myth of Romulus and Remus the survivors of Troy ( Thracian settlement )

    And we can see that Romulus is a very close name to Dacian name Romula

    In Southern Italy is a region named Appulia there is a dacian tribe named Appoulus

    And this theory can explain why Romanians are talking a latin related language .

    "Dromichaites was the king of Dacains , iar Lysimah the king of Macedonia . ..... . Dromichaites attacked the macedons and destroyed the all army . Those who have fallen with Lysimah where 100000 mans .
    " Polyainos
    Lysimah was the governor of Macedonia .
    That means war and Macedonia was defeated .


    The barbarian Dacians give back freedom to Lysimah and to his son and make peace . The daughter of Lysimah married Dromichaites .


    Darius tried also to go through Dacia to Scythians but the persian army was defeated by an Daco- Scythian army
    But there are some political interest in history if the celts wheren't so important then France and Germany lose a lil'bit from their importance . This is just an opinion
    Last edited by Dan Rares; November 08, 2010 at 08:11 AM.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine celts

    I thought modern day romanians spoke a latin language, because the roman influence was so strong in the romanian area?...

  5. #5
    Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Southampton, UK
    Posts
    1,563

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine celts

    Concerning the OP, yes we have read that article before, the genetic study is interesting although I wouldn't hold much faith in it, I think they are being a bit too hasty to assign some underlying genetic pattern to a specific group of people and more study is needed.

    The rest of the article is complete bull, Romans gained Celtic armour and helmets through their various battles with the Celts not from some supposed shared heritage.
    Latin and Gallic were not mutually intelligible either and the Italo-Celtic language family is a rather outdated theory which doesn't have much support these days.
    Finally, the Romans certainly didn't think of the Celts as "cousins", to them they were more like the archetypal "boogie man" ever since the sack of Rome by the Senones.



    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Rares View Post
    Also we can say the Romans are Thracians .
    We all now the myth of Romulus and Remus the survivors of Troy ( Thracian settlement )
    No one knows what ethnicity of the Trojans were, Luwian is generally considered the most likely.

    And we can see that Romulus is a very close name to Dacian name Romula

    In Southern Italy is a region named Appulia there is a dacian tribe named Appoulus
    That doesn't prove anything.


    And this theory can explain why Romanians are talking a latin related language .
    Or that Rome ruled and intensively colonised most of Dacia for the best part of 2 centuries, and that the area remained in close contact with the Empire for even longer.


    "Dromichaites was the king of Dacains , iar Lysimah the king of Macedonia . ..... . Dromichaites attacked the macedons and destroyed the all army . Those who have fallen with Lysimah where 100000 mans .
    " Polyainos
    Lysimah was the governor of Macedonia .
    That means war and Macedonia was defeated .


    The barbarian Dacians give back freedom to Lysimah and to his son and make peace . The daughter of Lysimah married Dromichaites .
    What does that have to do with anything on this thread?
    Also Lysimachos was not the ruler of Makedonia, that was Demetrius I.


    Darius tried also to go through Dacia to Scythians but the persian army was defeated by an Daco- Scythian army
    From all accounts I've heard it was a Scythian army and all the Thracian tribes encountered by Darius I were subdued.


    But there are some political interest in history if the celts wheren't so important then France and Germany lose a lil'bit from their importance . This is just an opinion
    Again you've lost me there.
    Last edited by bobbin; November 08, 2010 at 10:53 AM.


  6. #6

  7. #7

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine celts

    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Rares View Post
    But there are some political interest in history if the celts wheren't so important then France and Germany lose a lil'bit from their importance . This is just an opinion
    That's retarded. French and German cultural importance is tied to the Medieval and Modern ages anyway. Please don't derail the topic with inane conspiracy theories.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine celts

    As the saying goes: extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

  9. #9
    Senator
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,322

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine celts

    It's an interesting post, though i don't see what implications it would have for total war mods even if it turned out to be true, because we know for certain that the Romans did not see themselves as Celts or Germans or consider themselves close kin to them - they regarded them as barbarians and enemies, admiring their bravery but considering them inferior. (I'm definitely not saying the Romans were right there - in my opinion they were wrong - and the Romans conquered them due to their sheer bloody mindedness and determination to raise another army no matter how many defeats or losses they suffered - plus their social organisation allowing them huge manpower).

  10. #10

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine celts

    Quote Originally Posted by Dunadd View Post
    It's an interesting post, though i don't see what implications it would have for total war mods even if it turned out to be true, because we know for certain that the Romans did not see themselves as Celts or Germans or consider themselves close kin to them - they regarded them as barbarians and enemies, admiring their bravery but considering them inferior. (I'm definitely not saying the Romans were right there - in my opinion they were wrong - and the Romans conquered them due to their sheer bloody mindedness and determination to raise another army no matter how many defeats or losses they suffered - plus their social organisation allowing them huge manpower).

    And the fact that the romans were undoubtly a superior fighting force.. Certainly they suffered some defeats (they were not invencible after all) but it is a fact that roman organization, discipline and equipment were superior to that of both germans and gauls. One dont rise to the greatness of rome without merits.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Romans and Alpine celts

    I personaly always liked the Italo-Celtic theory, I think there is good change that the roman shared some cultural and genetic heritage with the celts. Perhaps proto italic might have been intelligible to proto celtic, But by the time of recorded history those links were mostly gone as both cultures had evolved independently in to something new and different.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •