Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 153

Thread: F-22 Raptor officially enters service for the USAF

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Protector Domesticus
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,045

    Default F-22 Raptor officially enters service for the USAF







    Link
    F-22A joins US fleet as top fighter
    From correspondents in Washington
    16dec05

    THE futuristic F-22A "Raptor" fighter jet, designed to dominate the skies well into the 21st century, joined the US combat fleet today, 20 years after it was conceived to fight Soviet MiGs over Europe.

    The Air Force said "initial operational capability" had been achieved by 16 of the aircraft at the 1st Fighter Wing's 27th Fighter Squadron at Langley Air Force Base, Virginia.

    Pilots in the squadron, the Air Force's oldest in continuous operation, have been training on the F-22 for about a year.

    "When asked to go to war, they're ready," said the 1st Fighter Wing's Sgt Thomas Doscher of the status change.

    The aircraft's role is to "kick the doors down" in a conflict, as Pentagon officials put it, knocking out defences on the ground and in the air to clear the way for other warplanes and forces.

    The radar-evading Raptor is twice as reliable and three times more effective than the F-15C Eagle it is replacing as the top US air-to-air fighter, according to Lockheed Martin Corp, its developer.

    Lockheed described the fighter as the world's most advanced and said it was "relevant for the next 40 years".

    Boeing Co and Northrop Grumman Corp are top F-22 subcontractors. United Technologies Corp's Pratt & Whitney unit makes the aircraft's two engines.

    The Raptor combines low-observability, or stealth, with supersonic speed, agility and cockpit displays designed to boost greatly pilots' awareness of the situation around them.

    At a "fly-away" cost of about $US130 million ($172.39 million) each for the most recent batch, not including research and development, it is also one of the most controversial US warplanes ever.

    Critics have termed it unaffordable overkill in a world without the potential threat of a Soviet Union able to send swarms of MiGs into a dogfight, which prompted its inception in 1986.

    The Air Force is planning to stretch F-22 production until 2010 to keep Lockheed's production line open pending arrival of its more affordable F-35 Joint Strike Fighter family of aircraft that will also go to the Navy, the Marines and co-developing nations that include Britain, Italy and Turkey.

    The F-22 also has a ground attack capability to drop 115kg bombs or 115kg Joint Direct Attack Munitions while flying at supersonic speeds.

    General Michael Moseley, the Air Force chief of staff, has said the F-22 is needed against threats such as Russian-built surface-to-air missiles sold overseas.

    Others have cast it as the weapon of choice for any future US conflict with China, for instance over Taiwan.
    Link

    12/15/2005 - LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE, Va. (AFPN) -- The F-22A Raptor -- Air Force’s most advanced weapon system -- is ready for combat, Air Force officials announced here today.

    In reaching initial operational capability, the Raptor is certified ready for operational use.

    The first combat-ready Raptors are flying with the 27th Fighter Squadron of the 1st Fighter Wing here. The squadron’s deployment capability is a 12-ship package designed to execute air-to-air and air-to-ground missions.

    “If we go to war tomorrow, the Raptor will go with us,” said Gen. Ronald E. Keys, commander of Air Combat Command.

    Declaring the transformational stealth fighter “IOC” means the Raptor’s proven capabilities are available for combat and supported by a properly trained and equipped force.

    It also means the aircraft is qualified to fly homeland defense missions.

    “F-22A IOC means our warfighters now have an unprecedented lethal mix of air-to-air and air-to-ground capabilities at their disposal,” General Keys said. “The Raptor’s cutting edge technology brings us continued joint air dominance despite advancing enemy threats.”

    Reaching the IOC milestone culminates a collaborative 25-year effort between various Air Force organizations and industry partners. The road to the IOC included was a step-by-step process. The F-22A System Program Office first turned Air Force requirements into a successful acquisition program. Then there was developmental flight test and evaluation, simulation and ground testing at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., and Eglin AFB, Fla. There was engine testing at Arnold AFB, Tenn., and missile testing at Holloman AFB, N.M., and over the Pacific Test Range. Also, there was tactics development at Nellis AFB, Nev., pilot and maintenance training at Tyndall AFB, Fla., and deployability here.

    “The F-22A fulfills a long quest to bring fifth-generation capabilities of stealth, supercruise and precision to the warfighter today and 30 years from today,” General Keys said. “Now that we have met our first promised milestone of a fully capable, multi-mission platform ready for combat, we are already focused on furthering our integrated tactics development, refining our deployabilty, growing and training our force.”

    The general said, “To add to what we learned on our successful first operational deployment to the Utah Test and Training Range to drop JDAMs (joint direct attack munition), fly against double-digit SAMs (surface-to-air missiles) at Nellis and work (close air support) with F-16 FAC-As, we will conduct our first routine peacetime exercise deployment by taking 12 Raptors to Alaska in June for Northern Edge.”

    Designed to ensure America’s air dominance for years to come, the F-22A will ensure U.S. joint forces’ freedom from attack and freedom to attack, even as adversaries continue to advance their weapons and technologies, officials said.

    “As I told (Air Force Chief of Staff) Gen. (T. Michael) Moseley, he and I have spent our lifetime executing, instructing and providing air dominance for the joint force. Lamentably, we have never been privileged to hold a weapon like this in our hands.

    “After reviewing our test results -- seeing our operational deployment performance and talking to the pilots that will go to war with it -- I am confident the F-22A joins the combat force at a far more mature and capable level than any of our previous great aircraft, and will take its rightful place in a long line of U.S. Air Force legends of the air,” General Keys said.
    This is a very pivotal day in the world of air-to-air combat, the F-22 is quite literally unrivaled today as the world's most advanced air superiority fighter, it's great news to see it finally become fully operational after some 19 years of development and billions of dollars in R&D.

  2. #2

    Default

    The raptor JUST joined active service? Jeez, I've been watching History Channel specials about the raptor and other modern aircraft for the longest time now and youre telling me the airforce hasnt actually even used the f-22 in combat yet? Thats a surprise to me...Do you know when or if the airforce is gonna purchase Joint Strike Fighters? Or are they for European countries only?

  3. #3

    Default

    Do you really need Raptors?
    Your airpower is unrivaled (by anyone fighting a war with you atm or likkely to be fighting with you in the near future).





  4. #4

    Default

    It's about time it entered service, it's been in development since the year I was born (1985). This is very cool though. I didn't take time to read the press releases (Hey, I had exams all day, so back off ) but judging from the tail symbol of "FF" it would appear they're in service with 1st Fighter Wing down at Langley AFB. It's only about 3 hours from my home town, maybe one day they'll fly one around near me.

  5. #5

    Default

    Yes, we definetly do need Raptors. Just incase Stalin or Lenin ever rise from the dead and bring brain hungry communist zombie armies with them.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RZZZA
    Yes, we definetly do need Raptors. Just incase Stalin or Lenin ever rise from the dead and bring brain hungry communist zombie armies with them.
    Zombies are useless. They're slow, stupid, and can be very easily destroyed :laughing:.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RZZZA
    The raptor JUST joined active service? Jeez, I've been watching History Channel specials about the raptor and other modern aircraft for the longest time now and youre telling me the airforce hasnt actually even used the f-22 in combat yet? Thats a surprise to me...
    :laughing: Yeah me too.

    Quote Originally Posted by RusskiSoldat
    Do you really need Raptors?
    Yeah we need Raptors. I think the F-22 is meant to replace the F-15.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RusskiSoldat
    Do you really need Raptors?
    Your airpower is unrivaled
    Yes, because the Raptors will keep it that way.
    The proud progeny of Lord Sephiroth.
    Also a proud member of the Royal House of the Black Prince.
    "What would you humans know of loss? The Eldar have been singing songs of lament before your race even crawled out of the ocean on your bellies."

  9. #9

    Default

    We've been flying F-15s and F-16s for ages. They're outdated now and the F-22 is what's going to keep the USAF way out in front of everybody else.

    Weird though... I thought the F-22 and the F-35 JSF were being deployed in 2008.

    Patron of Felixion, Ulyaoth, Reidy, Ran Taro and Darth Red
    Co-Founder of the House of Caesars


  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RusskiSoldat
    Do you really need Raptors?
    Your airpower is unrivaled (by anyone fighting a war with you atm or likkely to be fighting with you in the near future).
    yes, yes we do.
    mostly its to prevent the pesky europeans from getting anywhere near our airpower and technological advantages.
    we are arrogant and powerful like that
    but seeing that we are a superpower. we have that right
    The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be used until they try and take it away.
    Staff Officer of Corporal_Hicks in the Legion of Rahl
    Commanding Katrina, Crimson Scythe, drak10687 and Leonidas the Lion

  11. #11
    the_mango55's Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    20,753

    Default

    they used to flight test the things over my town, they are extremely fast. And loud as hell too, they will rattle your windows for like 5 min.


    yes, yes we do.
    mostly its to prevent the pesky europeans from getting anywhere near our airpower and technological advantages.
    we are arrogant and powerful like that
    but seeing that we are a superpower. we have that right
    Everyone has the "right" It's just a matter of who is willing to fork up the cash.
    ttt
    Adopted son of Lord Sephiroth, Youngest sibling of Pent uP Rage, Prarara the Great, Nerwen Carnesîr, TB666 and, Boudicca. In the great Family of the Black Prince

  12. #12

    Default

    What does the number after F stand for? I know the F stands for fighter but...why do the numbers jump around so much? First it was the F-14, then the F-16, then the F-18 so up till now I kinda get where theyre going with this...they increase by two each time....but then they made the F-22 raptor...well what happened to the number 20? And then they make a huge leap and apparently designate the joint strike figher as F-35? Pretty confuzzling.


    They should just name the first F-14 as F-version 1.0. Then version 2.0, then version 3.0...aaaand so on. Whoa look at the version 4.0 fly! Its got a certain ring to it...

  13. #13
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default

    Probably each test design takes up an F
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  14. #14

    Default

    Same reason there isn't an M15. Lots of different versions of the same planes in testing, each one taking up a number.

    But then ... the XM8 may be entering service soon and it will be designated... M8. M8? Don't we have M16A3s now? Shouldn't it be M61 or M80 or something?

    Patron of Felixion, Ulyaoth, Reidy, Ran Taro and Darth Red
    Co-Founder of the House of Caesars


  15. #15

    Default

    Yeah I really dont like how they name planes and tanks and guns in our military. M1A1 Abrams? It just doesnt have the same "strike fear into the hearts of your enemies" quality that KING TIGER TANK has. King Tiger or Panther Tank...now that sounds frightening! If you knew a division of KING TIGERS was coming your way, assuming you knew nothing of tanks...I bet you'd be scared. If you heard that a division of Abrams was coming your way, without knowing anything about tanks you'd have to ask wtf an Abrams is. King tiger? Theres no asking...you just know that you better move your ass.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RZZZA
    Yeah I really dont like how they name planes and tanks and guns in our military. M1A1 Abrams? It just doesnt have the same "strike fear into the hearts of your enemies" quality that KING TIGER TANK has. King Tiger or Panther Tank...now that sounds frightening! If you knew a division of KING TIGERS was coming your way, assuming you knew nothing of tanks...I bet you'd be scared. If you heard that a division of Abrams was coming your way, without knowing anything about tanks you'd have to ask wtf an Abrams is. King tiger? Theres no asking...you just know that you better move your ass.
    You'd be suprised that the M1A1 and the A2 are the descendents of the tiger tank, just like the leopard.

    If not everything but the main cannon is designed after the high velocity tiger tank's cannon.

    The M1 Abrams was designed by Chrysler Defense (In 1982, General Dynamics Land Systems Division purchased Chrysler Defense Division) and is currently produced by General Dynamics Corporation and first entered US Army service in 1980. An improved version of the M1, the M1A1, was introduced in 1985. The M1A1 has the L44 120 mm smoothbore gun developed by Rheinmetall AG of Germany for the Leopard 2, improved armor, and an NBC protection system. The M1A2 is a further improvement of the M1A1 with a commander's thermal viewer and weapon station, position navigation equipment, digital data bus and a radio interface unit.
    I had the luck of during war exercises in the Mojave Desert with Abrams tanks and all kinds of other armor involved. You'll never see the tanks coming, since by the time they enter into your eye- sight, you are most likely dead. Even if the battle if simulated.
    Nothing is scarier than getting killed by something which you don't even see.

    It's the same with the raptors.

    Well whats wrong with the M16 rifle? With a few tweaks and modifications its still a reliable infantry rifle. I know there are some jamming issues but like I said...with a few tweaks and modifications..
    If you have never fired it or used it under combat conditions, you don't know what is wrong with it. the damn thing is prone to jam even in the cleanest conditions of a regular target practice, let alone the dirt and mud. But i have to give it to it - it's easy to use and accurate.
    Still, I'd rather have an AK47, which is the most reliable auto rifle ever.
    Last edited by HorseArcher; December 16, 2005 at 12:19 AM.

  17. #17
    Protector Domesticus
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,045

    Default

    they really want the heavier man-stopping 7.62 round,
    Actually there are a lot of pushs being made for the military to adopt an all new 6.7mm caliber ammunition for the next gen infantry weapons, they say it would combine the stopping power of the 7.62 round with the accuracy of the 5.56.

  18. #18

    Default

    But the AK47 isnt anywhere NEAR as accurate as the M16. Its true Ive never fired any guns in real life but I read about them, I watch about them on T.V., and I play games with them which are largely modeled after real life nowadays, so actually its pretty accurate in most of the modern shooter games.

    And its true that the Abrams outclasses the old king tigers by probably 10 fold but I meant just the name...I mean I get what the U.S. army was trying to do by honoring Abrams the man but its just not a very fear-inducing name for the best tank in the world. They should name it...Rolling Deathbox or something. Just once I'd like to see something resembling humor or style/flair come out of our military

  19. #19
    Oldgamer's Avatar My President ...
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Illinois, and I DID obtain my concealed carry permit! I'm packin'!
    Posts
    7,520

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RZZZA
    Yeah I really dont like how they name planes and tanks and guns in our military. M1A1 Abrams? It just doesnt have the same "strike fear into the hearts of your enemies" quality that KING TIGER TANK has. King Tiger or Panther Tank...now that sounds frightening! If you knew a division of KING TIGERS was coming your way, assuming you knew nothing of tanks...I bet you'd be scared. If you heard that a division of Abrams was coming your way, without knowing anything about tanks you'd have to ask wtf an Abrams is. King tiger? Theres no asking...you just know that you better move your ass.
    It's all right. The enemy would learn about the Abrams quick enough ...

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Justinian
    Same reason there isn't an M15. Lots of different versions of the same planes in testing, each one taking up a number.

    But then ... the XM8 may be entering service soon and it will be designated... M8. M8? Don't we have M16A3s now? Shouldn't it be M61 or M80 or something?
    The XM8 was just recently cancelled; it's going to stay as the "XM8".

    Also, the F-35 has continuously run into funding overruns, causing much concern. There was a recent push on Capitol Hill that funding should be controlled and one (of 3) version should be cancelled. However, the F-35 is to be deployed around 2008-2010.
    Last edited by jedisponge; December 15, 2005 at 10:09 PM.

Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •