Patch BI 1.6

**Checkers** · December 15, 2005, 12:46 AM

There was some sort of fix which Adherbal was looking for in the BI 1.6 patch which would facilitate his work and alleviate the need for a scripted solution. Does the patch fix what he was looking for, whatever that was?

**Kor Khan** · December 15, 2005, 06:56 AM

The main problem was that the map.rwm couldn't get generated with the new buildings. According to SigniferOne, this bug got fixed, but Adherbal hasn't said anything on the subject yet.

**Bello Gallicum** · December 15, 2005, 12:02 PM

Ohhh. He is probably just mean. He probably fixed it already. But he won't tell us.

**alpaca** · December 16, 2005, 09:44 AM

My tests suggest otherwise unfortunately...

**Adherbal** · December 16, 2005, 11:50 AM

the problem isn't fixed. give my thanks to CA for some further disencouragement

**Chuffy** · December 16, 2005, 12:54 PM

Awesome job CA, awesome job.

**Publius Scipio** · December 16, 2005, 04:47 PM

Does this... mean... waiting for the (final?) patch?!?

**Hellenes** · December 16, 2005, 04:53 PM

Originally Posted by Tacitus Cornelius

Does this... mean... waiting for the (final?) patch?!?

You mean the imaginary patch?

Hellenes

**Skyhigh** · December 16, 2005, 09:52 PM

so what does all this mean?
is the mod delayed further?
what needs to be fixed in the mod that requires a patch?

**Anonymous Researcher** · December 17, 2005, 01:56 AM

Can someone tell me what this "bug" is and did someone posted about it in the CA forum?
I doubt CA stuff is lurking on this TWC forum looking for bug report.
I'm really anxious to play this mod and I would hate it to be delayed several months because someone forgot to tell CA about it.

**Kor Khan** · December 17, 2005, 04:18 AM

Originally Posted by Anonymous Researcher

Can someone tell me what this "bug" is and did someone posted about it in the CA forum?
I doubt CA stuff is lurking on this TWC forum looking for bug report.
I'm really anxious to play this mod and I would hate it to be delayed several months because someone forgot to tell CA about it.

It's been discussed a lot over at totalwar.org, and CA members have confirmed it as a bug long ago. Unfortunately, despite having said that they'll fix it with upcoming patches, they haven't done it so far.

Basically, the bug prevents new buildings from being imported into the campaign. As buildings are an essential new feature in the mod, this is a big problem for us.

**Bello Gallicum** · December 17, 2005, 04:34 AM

:sign_wtf: Ohhhh!!! Oh...lets just Bomb that place!

That is so not fair. Damn CA Crew.

**The White Knight** · December 21, 2005, 09:46 AM

Originally Posted by Kor Khan

It's been discussed a lot over at totalwar.org, and CA members have confirmed it as a bug long ago. Unfortunately, despite having said that they'll fix it with upcoming patches, they haven't done it so far.

Basically, the bug prevents new buildings from being imported into the campaign. As buildings are an essential new feature in the mod, this is a big problem for us.

I still think you need to go to www.totalwar.com with it, and not a fansite.

**Kor Khan** · December 21, 2005, 11:24 AM

You'll be surprised, but CA staff members (particularly the helpful ones) hang out a lot more at the .org forums rather than .com . Besides, I'm pretty sure the issue has been raised at the official boards too.

**Anonymous Researcher** · December 17, 2005, 06:10 AM

Well, I think we should ask CA to fix this bug, in the official forum.
Maybe the CA guy in the forum forgot to report or something, or CA is still working on to fix it.

**Publius Scipio** · December 17, 2005, 01:18 PM

What ever you do, don't go back to 1.2

**Nobunuga oda** · December 17, 2005, 04:55 PM

keep it on the vannlia bi, the patch is only minor and hardly fixes anything that any mod will need, also the patch delays every mod further and ruins christmas demos and mod releases.