I was only referencing the wiki, I'll have to reread.
I was only referencing the wiki, I'll have to reread.
Then why don't you edit the wiki?
that picture you posted have this decription - Example of stunted tree exhibiting a krummholz formation - yoz should at least read part of that article and picture descripiton,just blind picture-postin
These were the edits since my post, I'll review them for your pleasure later, in the meantime feel free to laugh if that was NOT changed as I don't recall the current picture at the time.
(cur | prev) 02:17, 27 January 2011 Kjoonlee (talk | contribs) (6,303 bytes) (No... revert wrong IPA, wrong template) (undo)
(cur | prev) 02:02, 26 January 2011 ErgoSum88 (talk | contribs) (6,329 bytes) (add pronunciation, thanks to everyone at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Language#Swedish pronunciation for their input) (undo)
(cur | prev) 22:47, 19 November 2010 Headbomb (talk | contribs) m (6,303 bytes) (clean up for Book:Trees of the World using AWB) (undo)
Edit: Actually this one wasn't, but interesting
(cur | prev) 18:32, 31 August 2010 CommonsDelinker (talk | contribs) m (6,303 bytes) (Replacing Old_Tjikko_Dalarna.jpg with File:Old_Tjikko.jpg (by Túrelio because: exact or scaled-down duplicate).) (undo)
oh well
But it was written it is a Norway spruce(picea abies),which is very different from Mountain pine (pinus mugo)
Well I'm glad we got that straightened out, now then how do we know this is the right tree?