Yeah well. It didn't come to much though.
Last edited by Araz; October 03, 2010 at 08:13 AM.
Anyway, as you say Araz, the Republic of Turkey was declared in 1923.
Well the ADR might have been an early republic but several, if not most European states were simply Constitutional monarchies with parliamentary democracy. The only dictatoships in Europe in 1918 I can come up with would be Austria-Hungary, Germany and Russia/Bolscheviks.
Historically it is correct that Azerbaijan was the first Muslim country to "adopt" democracy and practice it for a while. Unfortunately it didn't last long because the external factors were just too strong and Azeris couldn't do much.
[IMG][/IMG]
أسد العراق Asad al-Iraq
KOSOVO IS SERBIA!!!
Under the proud patronage of the magnificent Tzar
"modern" parliamentary republics have existed in "western" nations since the United Provinces was formed in 1581. In antiquity most of the middle mediterranean had democracies.
and why are you restricting this to parliamentary republics? Presidential republics have mayn advantages.
Last edited by removeduser_4536284751384; October 03, 2010 at 08:47 AM.
Azerbaijan democratic?![]()
Mind pointing out the ignorance, i stated that what a nation claims to represent and what it practices in reality are two vastly different things. Or you'd expect the USA to have abolished slavery in 1779.
To give credit where credit is due, they did constitutionally invoke universal suffrage before most European nations. That is an achievement.
"You have a decent ear for notes
but you can't yet appreciate harmony."
When women could vote in Azerbaijan (1918), there was no such thing in most of Europe.
And to Their Law, 1918 Republic was as democratic as it gets. Here we don't talk about modern situation in Azerbaijan. Since your saying " i stated that what a nation claims to represent and what it practices in reality are two vastly different things". However, this is about 1918-1920 Republic.
Last edited by Araz; October 03, 2010 at 08:52 AM.
As we've just acknowledged.
The republic lasted two years. To be honest we don't have a decent length of time to see what it's characteristics were. I'm not demeaning it, on paper it is an incredibly democratic country, it adopted a voting system that my country still hasn't got round to implementing.
Last edited by Their Law; October 03, 2010 at 08:54 AM.
"You have a decent ear for notes
but you can't yet appreciate harmony."
Besides the Musavat majority, Ehrar, Ittihad, Muslim Social-democrats as well as representatives of Armenian (21 out of 120 seats[2]), Russian, Polish, Jewish and German minorities gained seats in the parliament. Some members supported Pan-Islamist and Pan-Turkist ideas[6].
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azerbai...ratic_Republic
About your question of how democratic it actually was in practice.
I'm aware of Azerbaijan's recent history as i have had the misfortune to have participated in at least three Armenia vs Azerbaijan threads.
But within the context of you're thread topic it is a commendable achievement. It's a pity it seemed to be a flash in the pan in Azerbaijan's history. Certainly when you compare it to today's government.
"You have a decent ear for notes
but you can't yet appreciate harmony."