Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    In southern spain, france and italy you have great aquadecuts, theatres, ampitheatres etc but in northern france and in britain you have none of these things despite being Roman provinces for 400 years aprx, why is this?

  2. #2
    Opifex
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    15,154

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    Oh there ARE large buildings, it's just that they were destroyed. Just take a look at all the theaters and buildings found in Britain alone.


    "If ye love wealth greater than liberty,
    the tranquility of servitude greater than
    the animating contest for freedom, go
    home from us in peace. We seek not
    your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch
    down and lick the hand that feeds you,
    and may posterity forget that ye were
    our countrymen."
    -Samuel Adams

  3. #3
    Miroslav Klose's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Enschede, Netherlands
    Posts
    4,653

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    Porta Nigra in Trier for example, there are some remains in Xanten as well.

    It's true the Romans build more in the Mediterrenean area, and lots of building in the north were destroyed.











    Click here for the future Eurovision Songfestival winner
    The same brilliant person also made the BEST CHRISTMAS SONG EVER!






    Quote Originally Posted by Erebus26 View Post
    I still love you Dutchies Tukker
    Quote Originally Posted by Cahoma View Post
    Don't talk to my sister Paul!
    Quote Originally Posted by Twilight Sparkle View Post
    But Nazis like ponies!

  4. #4
    Flavius Nevitta's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    1,747

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    The towns of Trier and Cologne had several huge baths. The Kaisertherme in Trier with a cupola of over 16m in diametre.

    "The town wall of Cologne, built in the first decade of the first century, was 2˝ meters wide and eight meters high, and had nine gates and twenty-one towers. Its total length was no less than 3,900 meters and it surrounded a city with a surface of almost a square kilometer (96.8 hectare to be precise)."

    Here a 3D reconstruction of CCAA (Cologne)

    Heidentor in Carnuntum:
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    RESTITVTOR LIBERTATIS ET ROMANAE RELIGIONIS

    MINERVAE ET SOLIS INVICTI DISCIPVLVS

    formerly known as L.C.Cinna

  5. #5
    René Artois's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    18,851

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Grimes View Post
    In southern spain, france and italy you have great aquadecuts, theatres, ampitheatres etc but in northern france and in britain you have none of these things despite being Roman provinces for 400 years aprx, why is this?
    Apart from the fact that France is north of the med, there are. Villas and other buildings are being found constantly in Britain. Take a look at the archaeology sub-forum.
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=389367
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=393125
    It was only 6 years ago that they found a Roman Circus that was almost the size of Colchester, almost as big as the Circus Maximus in Rome.
    Bitter is the wind tonight,
    it stirs up the white-waved sea.
    I do not fear the coursing of the Irish sea
    by the fierce warriors of Lothlind.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    Quote Originally Posted by Captain Grimes View Post
    In southern spain, france and italy you have great aquadecuts, theatres, ampitheatres etc but in northern france and in britain you have none of these things despite being Roman provinces for 400 years aprx, why is this?
    Some of them destroyed thru history, and it also has got to do something that these areas were never core Roman areas, don't you think?

  7. #7

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    southern france isnt north of the med it borders it +1 rep

  8. #8

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    The Roman villa at Fishbourne, England, hypothesized to have been built by the native client king Togidubnus, is on a size and par with almost any in Italy - it is often dubbed the largest north of Italy, something I'm not so sure about, but it still goes to show it was a substantial building. It burned down in about 270 AD.

    I would guess the climate extremes of the north would take a toll on the remaining buildings (I know Rome in winter ain't exactly tropical) with the sedimentation that eventually covers them being more extreme, but local people knicking the stone was also a major contributor. PS - the Coliseum is believed to have only escaped the same fate because the papacy decided it was a holy spot due to christians being martyred there.

  9. #9
    DAVIDE's Avatar QVID MELIVS ROMA?
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ITALIA
    Posts
    15,811

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    Quote Originally Posted by Blarni View Post
    PS - the Coliseum is believed to have only escaped the same fate because the papacy decided it was a holy spot due to christians being martyred there.
    Is not believed simply because no Roman inhabitant during middle age knew what that building served for originally. There are sources of the time telling this

  10. #10
    Opifex
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    15,154

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    Quote Originally Posted by davide.cool View Post
    There are sources of the time telling this
    I'd be interested in reading them.


    "If ye love wealth greater than liberty,
    the tranquility of servitude greater than
    the animating contest for freedom, go
    home from us in peace. We seek not
    your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch
    down and lick the hand that feeds you,
    and may posterity forget that ye were
    our countrymen."
    -Samuel Adams

  11. #11

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?


  12. #12
    DAVIDE's Avatar QVID MELIVS ROMA?
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ITALIA
    Posts
    15,811

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    For example La Fiorita written by Armannino, 1325 AD. Armannino, a notary, not knowing what Coliseum was in ancient times aka basically an arena for spectacles, substained that the building was a huge temple or well the main pagan temple of the known world. Inside it, many diabolic spirits were contained and those spirits were able doing prodigies. The priests, showing the effigy of the main demon to the crowd, were usual asking them "colis eum??????" which in latin of medieval times meant "do you venerate it???" Apart that, there are also some other manuscripts now collected in Laurenziana's Library in Florence, some of them written by anonymous people and dated 14th and beginning of 15th century in which it is said that Coliseum was a gigantic temple of the sun fully covered in golden bronze material with the purpose of rapresenting the stars

  13. #13
    Opifex
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    15,154

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    Quote Originally Posted by davide.cool View Post
    For example La Fiorita written by Armannino, 1325 AD. Armannino, a notary, not knowing what Coliseum was in ancient times aka basically an arena for spectacles, substained that the building was a huge temple or well the main pagan temple of the known world. Inside it, many diabolic spirits were contained and those spirits were able doing prodigies. The priests, showing the effigy of the main demon to the crowd, were usual asking them "colis eum??????" which in latin of medieval times meant "do you venerate it???" Apart that, there are also some other manuscripts now collected in Laurenziana's Library in Florence, some of them written by anonymous people and dated 14th and beginning of 15th century in which it is said that Coliseum was a gigantic temple of the sun fully covered in golden bronze material with the purpose of rapresenting the stars
    Wow, hehe, that's pretty amazing, and sad what a lack of knowledge there was.


    "If ye love wealth greater than liberty,
    the tranquility of servitude greater than
    the animating contest for freedom, go
    home from us in peace. We seek not
    your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch
    down and lick the hand that feeds you,
    and may posterity forget that ye were
    our countrymen."
    -Samuel Adams

  14. #14

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    Dont think Arnie destroyed Roman buildings Siphazade

  15. #15
    The Noble Lord's Avatar Holy Arab Nation
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Peshawar, Pakistan - Kabul, Afghanistan
    Posts
    7,809

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    There are some beautiful Roman buildings in France and Vindolanda finds in Britain. Plus the Hadrian Wall, Roman finds in Former Yugoslavia, etc.
    [IMG][/IMG]
    أسد العراق Asad al-Iraq
    KOSOVO IS SERBIA!!!
    Under the proud patronage of the magnificent Tzar


  16. #16
    DAVIDE's Avatar QVID MELIVS ROMA?
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ITALIA
    Posts
    15,811

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    All people there were like him. Just thanks to Flavio Biondo and Poggio Bracciolini in 1414 or something circa, the originary purpose of Coliseum has been understood, through the rediscovering of classical world thanks to Greek and Latin texts.. Bracciolini for example, it is the same guy which "discovered" the Vitruvian De Architectura and many others

  17. #17

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    Quote Originally Posted by davide.cool View Post
    All people there were like him. Just thanks to Flavio Biondo and Poggio Bracciolini in 1414 or something circa, the originary purpose of Coliseum has been understood, through the rediscovering of classical world thanks to Greek and Latin texts.. Bracciolini for example, it is the same guy which "discovered" the Vitruvian De Architectura and many others
    Interesting, thanks.

  18. #18
    DAVIDE's Avatar QVID MELIVS ROMA?
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ITALIA
    Posts
    15,811

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    or in Mirabilia Urbis Romae, a guide for tourists and pilgrims about Rome dated after the year 1000, Coliseum was just a great temple of the sun exactly as thought by many at the time, but with a gigantic dome on it with a gigantic statue of Apollo inside the temple, with Apollo having a sphere in one of his hands, meaning Rome holding the weight of the world


    English edition of "Mirabilia Urbis Romae"

  19. #19
    Opifex
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    15,154

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    There I think he confused the vast statue of Apollo that really did stand next to the Coliseum.


    "If ye love wealth greater than liberty,
    the tranquility of servitude greater than
    the animating contest for freedom, go
    home from us in peace. We seek not
    your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch
    down and lick the hand that feeds you,
    and may posterity forget that ye were
    our countrymen."
    -Samuel Adams

  20. #20

    Default Re: Why no grand Roman buildings north of the mediterrean?

    The city Bath in England, for example, was named after the Roman bath built there.

    But I think in general, there was probably less Roman investment in those areas as well?
    "My brothers. I see in your eyes the same fear that would take the heart of me. A day may come when the Arsenal is no more, when we forsake our friends and break all bonds of gooner-ship, but it is not this day. An hour of Spuds and shattered cannons when the Highbury Emirates comes crashing down, but it is not this day! This day we fight! By all that you hold dear on this good earth, I bid you stand, Men of North London!"
    - Aragooner

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •