Which one is better? early or late campaign? is there really a difference?
can someone give me the link to this info? thx!!
Which one is better? early or late campaign? is there really a difference?
can someone give me the link to this info? thx!!
I can't remember the start dates but early (surprisingly) takes place earlier than the late campaign. Most factions have more regions and better developed citys aswell as better starting armys. Also you start being able to build better troops and buildigns rather than having to wait like in early. If you want to build your empire up from not much then early is best, if you dont want to wait as long for thigns late is best.
If you want to play Teutonic Order or Mongols you must play Late Era![]()
Teutonic Crusades Sub-mod for SS6.3
Many graphical enhancements to Teutonic Order and Lithuania factions
I see thx guys.
And if you want to play the Crusader States, you have to play early.
Is because you are dead. Jihad turn 10, mongols, few castles/cities.
Kill Them All, Let God Sort Them Out!
I play them late.
The trick is, be manly, slaughter everything, and know that "Peace" is another word for "Hold on, I gotta reload."
VH/VH for me!
I like being kicked in the teeth all in the name of god. Oh yeah, and beat the holy crap out of anything that moves, never lose momentum, or you be a dead man.
Well, Lithuania is hard in Late, 1-3 turns, i thought omg it's so easy, then came danes, TO spammed troops, novgorod came with 2 stacks, and polish were the finisher. Owned
Byz is also difficult, i'm playing it right now, i went "all in" for taking constantinople, seljuks got nicae, i got sinop and adrianople, and now under siege : Trebizond, Sinop, Cannakale and i'm taking Athens defended by 4 units with my 3 units, i'll need some luck, just lost Durrazo. That's some action, it's great!
That's weird. I could have sworn there were no CS in Late Campaign. Either it's because of RR/RC, or I'm wrong.