I'm playing as the Teutonic Order and after the 4th time Novgorod asked me to become their vassal I kindly inclined to accept their request. I had been fighting a war on 3 fronts - Novgorod to the east, Lithuania to the south, and Poland to the west - even Denmark would attack from the north from time to time, although they were not much of a threat, but because it took more than 20 turns of Poland's aggression for the Pope to finally call for an excommunication I decided that becomming Novgorod's vassal was in my best long-term interests.
I control the cities of Visby and Riga, along with castles in Vilnius, Turku, Uppsala, Konigsberg and finally Thorn, which removed a huge thorn in my side. Sorry. Once Poland was excommunicated and Novgorod became my parent nation, seizing Thorn was my first priority and I now control the majority of castles in NE Europe. As a result of their insolence once-powerful Poland was reduced to 2 provinces when the HRE followed in my footsteps by taking Stettin. Now that Poland has been rendered useless and eastern Europe is safe from Catholic heathens and Pagans, I can switch gears and once again focus on Novgorod...my good old protector. Having military access will allow me to easily march an army to the banks of their capitol. At least that's the plan.
But now my question and the reason for the thread, which wasn't to gloat, is there any harm in being someone's vassal? I have been Novgorod's vassal for approximatley 20 turns and all it seems to have done is remove their armies from my lands....I have not ever had a surplus of gold and when I check my financial chart it looks like I am not paying anything in diplomacy or tributes.... essentially it removed a threat and will allow me to take their capitol under the guise of being an ally, without having paid a dime....is that correct? If so then being a vassal can actually be quite useful.




Reply With Quote












