Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 38

Thread: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    As many of you may know, the president of Belarus, Lukashenko is known as the last dictator in Europe. His country as a result has had very little democratic reform since independence. Belarus has also been ever since a staunch ally of Russia, even entering a union with Russia. However, recently relations have been strained between Lukashenko and Moscow, and Lukashenko has hinted at possibly creating more ties with EU and the West. Will the upcoming election finally bring about a president who can carry out the needed reforms? Will Russia replace Lukashenko with a president more friendly to them? Or may a colour revolution come about?

    http://www.euronews.net/2010/09/14/b...tion-campaign/

    Belarus Sets December Date For Presidential Vote

    by RFE/RL

    Lawmakers in the Belarusian National Assembly have overwhelmingly approved a mid-December date for the country's presidential election, scheduling the polling nearly four months ahead of when strongman President Alyaksandr Lukashenka's third term is due to expire.

    Many had initially expected the vote to be held in January or early February. By law, the vote must be held no later than February 6, two months before the end of Lukashenka's current term.

    But parliament member Vasil Baikou, presenting the election bill during an extraordinary session on September 14, said December 19 was the "most optimal" date for the vote and his fellow legislators agreed.
    continued
    "The commission's goal was to ensure maximum citizen participation in the election and hold the election at a time convenient for the voters," Baikou said. "Holding the election before the end of this year, without losing time on an electoral process, will enable [the elected president] to begin solving social and economic tasks for the coming year and the next five-year period immediately starting from the beginning of 2011."

    The earlier election date may be an attempt by Lukashenka, who is expected to run for a fourth term, to limit the potential momentum of rival candidates.

    The authoritarian Lukashenka has held office since 1994, and has rarely faced a serious political challenge in his multiple reelection bids. But economic setbacks and mounting animus from Moscow have left the Belarusian leader in a position of greater-than-usual vulnerability.

    In recent years, Lukashenka has sporadically courted nontraditional partners, including the West, in a bid to counterbalance Russia's historic dominance.

    His actions have put him increasingly at odds with Moscow, which frequently uses its monopoly over energy supplies and its continued subsidies of the Belarusian economy to pressure Minsk in times of discord.

    Outside Influence?

    In June, Russia temporarily reduced natural-gas supplies to Belarus amid a season of disputes over a proposed customs union and Minsk's offer of refuge to the ousted president of Kyrgyzstan, Kurmanbek Bakiev, a decision that Moscow opposed.

    In late August, Russia expressed outrage when assailants threw two Molotov cocktails into the compound of the Russian Embassy in Minsk. And a dispute has long simmered over Belarus's unwillingness to follow Moscow in formally recognizing Georgia's breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

    Belarus's Mozyr underground gas storage facility in the Gomel region
    The rising enmity has prompted suggestions the Kremlin may once again seek to renegotiate the price of its energy sales to Belarus in January, at a time when bracing winter temperatures can amplify its powers of persuasion.

    In moving the elections forward, Lukashenka may have been seeking to preempt the damage that a hike in energy prices, and the resulting spike in utility costs, could do to his reelection bid.

    The move also allows the Belarusian leader to make good on a populist promise to raise average salaries to $500 -- from under $430 -- a promise he might not be able to honor following a Russian pricing spike.

    Uladzimir Nyaklyaeu, the head of the Tell the Truth civic campaign and a likely presidential candidate, told RFE/RL's Belarus Service that a wave of impending economic troubles made the December election date practically inevitable.

    "So to hold an election and wage a political campaign under such inauspicious economic conditions would be suicidal for the government, for Lukashenka," Nyaklyaeu said. "That's why the election will take place prior to the start of the new year -- while the situation is still more or less acceptable, while there are still available funds to pay off factory workers, pensioners, and all other state employees."

    Window Of Opportunity?

    Many observers have suggested the Kremlin is eager to see Lukashenka finally removed from his post and is openly orchestrating his ouster. Russia's NTV channel in July broadcast a highly critical documentary on Lukashenka. The program, titled "The Godfather," focused on several high-profile disappearances in Belarus during Lukashenka's presidency in the 1990s.

    This week, a video posted on YouTube purported to document an anonymous former employee of the Russian security forces claiming Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin is actively planning Lukashenka's assassination.

    A leaflet in Belarus telling the public that NTV's "The Godfather" is "must see" TV.
    The Kremlin has denounced the clip as nonsense; even so, by shortening the campaign season, Lukashenka may also be looking to limit the impact of Russian propaganda, real or imagined. Perhaps hedging his bets, Lukashenka today pledged his support and loyalty to Moscow in a meeting with Nikolai Bordyuzha, the head of the Collective Security Treaty Organization that binds Belarus and five other post-Soviet countries with Russia.

    With the elections now scheduled, attention will turn to the opposition, to see which candidates are ultimately put forward as Lukashenka's rivals for the race.

    Belarusian opposition leaders have indicated they hope to coordinate efforts during the upcoming presidential campaign, but they have failed to come up with a single opposition candidate.

    Former presidential contender Alyaksandr Milinkevich, arguably the country's best-known opposition politician, has suggested he might not run in the upcoming vote, despite earlier pledges that he would. Milinkevich told RFE/RL's Belarus Service after the parliamentary vote that he would make a final decision by the end of this week.

    But as many as 10 others have expressed their initial intention to run against Lukashenka. In addition to Nyaklyaeu, they include Syarhey Haidukevich, the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party; Yaroslav Romanchuk, deputy chair of the opposition United Civil Party; and Viktar Tsyareshchanka, chairman of the country's small-business association.

    Another likely candidate is Andrey Sannikau, who heads the European Belarus movement. Sannikau's standing may gain moral weight from his close association with Aleh Byabenin, the opposition journalist who was found hanged in his country home earlier this month.

    Prosecutors initially called Byabenin's death a suicide but have since acknowledged the journalist might have been murdered. Byabenin's death has galvanized the country's opposition activists and prompted angry calls by the West for an open investigation.

    Speaking to RFE/RL's Belarus Service, Sannikau criticized the government for keeping the public guessing for so long about the election date.

    But he said that regardless of when the elections were held, they would be an opportunity for voters to put the country on a fresh path with its neighbors and the world.

    "Everything surrounding this date -- the secrets, the rumors -- tells you something about the situation we're in," Sannikau said. "The government can't even candidly and conscientiously tell the people when the election will be held, how it will be held, etc."

    He speculated that the vote was set before the new year because "it's evident that relations with everybody -- Russia, Europe -- are complicated, and will grow even more complicated for Lukashenka."

    "That's why it's necessary to change this government," Sannikau said. "I'm ready for the election and the [announced] date doesn't change any of my plans."

    Potential presidential hopefuls must now collect 100,000 signatures to formally establish their candidacy. That process begins on September 30, once the candidate groups tasked with collecting the signatures have themselves been registered.

    Lidziya Yarmoshyna, the chair of Belarus's Central Election Commission, said today that international observers would be invited to monitor the elections.

    Observers denounced the results of the country's last presidential elections in 2006, saying the vote had been rigged. Lukashenka officially won 83 percent of the vote in that contest.

    written by Daisy Sindelar based on RFE/RL and agency reports
    Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty © 2010 RFE/RL, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    Last edited by Darth Red; September 16, 2010 at 08:30 AM. Reason: spoiler
    [ Under Patronage of Jom ]
    [ "For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also." Matthew 6:21 ]

  2. #2

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Duno what the people of Belarus thinks, but it would be best for Russia that there comes a new, more controllable government.

    though kudos for Lukaschenko that Belarus wasn't turned into another Ukraine (don't get me wrong, Belarus was ed by the collapse of USSR, but not nearly as bad as Russia or Ukraine).
    Last edited by Nikitn; September 16, 2010 at 07:32 AM.

  3. #3
    Jaketh's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    8,973

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Russia should just Nomz it

  4. #4

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Well the main thing is that living standards don't decrease. So far his govt has been ok in that regard. Yes, they're corrupt and they steal, but at least it's a controlled theft. 'Revolutions' and 'democratisation' and such tend to make it go out of control in former USSR countries.

    Thats why Belarus remains the most developed and industrialised country of the former USSR; "communists stole, but at least they shared," as they say.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    The question is - does Belarus really need any changes right now? Out of all post-Soviet states Belarus is most successful. Lukashenko effectively prevented privatization and oligarchy, things that led Russian and Ukraine into terrible economic conditions.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Joe View Post
    The question is - does Belarus really need any changes right now? Out of all post-Soviet states Belarus is most successful. Lukashenko effectively prevented privatization and oligarchy, things that led Russian and Ukraine into terrible economic conditions.





    Who doesnt like Lukashenko? A Soviet Dictator still ruling in 21th century.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Quote Originally Posted by RomanSoldier9001 View Post

    Who doesnt like Lukashenko? A Soviet Dictator still ruling in 21th century.
    Its not a bad thing thou. It is definitely better alternative to a "color revolution" and a pro-western puppet regime that usually follows.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Joe View Post
    Its not a bad thing thou. It is definitely better alternative to a "color revolution" and a pro-western puppet regime that usually follows.
    Yes is preferble to be Russian puppet because is less of puppet?

  9. #9

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Quote Originally Posted by RomanSoldier9001 View Post
    Yes is preferble to be Russian puppet because is less of puppet?
    Not really, in fact I think Lukashenko would make a good president in Russia.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    The question is - does Belarus really need any changes right now? Out of all post-Soviet states Belarus is most successful.
    It should be remembered that Belarus was the most industrialized, advanced and wealthy part of the Soviet union, and it does not have the ethnic tensions of other ex-Soviet Republics. In most any scenario it would have done reasonably well post-USSR, especially with its very high concentration of capital.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sphere View Post
    It should be remembered that Belarus was the most industrialized, advanced and wealthy part of the Soviet union, and it does not have the ethnic tensions of other ex-Soviet Republics. In most any scenario it would have done reasonably well post-USSR, especially with its very high concentration of capital.
    Please stop posting lies, seriously that lie is just ridiculous. In 1989 Belarus was a backwater compared to Ukraine, Balticum and most of Russia.

    Actually, Belarus had been backwards since it was completely razed by the Germans during WW2.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sphere View Post
    It should be remembered that Belarus was the most industrialized, advanced and wealthy part of the Soviet union, and it does not have the ethnic tensions of other ex-Soviet Republics. In most any scenario it would have done reasonably well post-USSR, especially with its very high concentration of capital.
    Actually Ukraine was much more industrialized. And infrustructure in BSSR historically wasn't so good due to consequences of WW2. The reason why Belarus is doing so good is that Lukashenko prevented privatization in 1990s.

  13. #13
    intel's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    4,685

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Joe View Post
    Actually Ukraine was much more industrialized. And infrustructure in BSSR historically wasn't so good due to consequences of WW2. The reason why Belarus is doing so good is that Lukashenko prevented privatization in 1990s.
    Volh, I love your 'privatisation' fetish. What's so wrong with privatisation? It isn't a bad process, it actually was introduced in everywhere west of USSR and worked fine, helped economic growth, gave budget a injection of funds and so.

    The terms you should have used should be:
    -corruption
    -fragmentation of society
    -political instability
    -oligarchy

    Not privatisation.


  14. #14

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Quote Originally Posted by intel View Post
    Volh, I love your 'privatisation' fetish. What's so wrong with privatisation? It isn't a bad process, it actually was introduced in everywhere west of USSR and worked fine, helped economic growth, gave budget a injection of funds and so.

    The terms you should have used should be:
    -corruption
    -fragmentation of society
    -political instability
    -oligarchy

    Not privatisation.
    Countries that were west from USSR had a different economic structure. Economy of, say, Poland was relatively self-sufficient. However, economies of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine were closely integrated with each other. Another factor is that industry in post-Soviet Union was built in assertion that it is completly owned by the government. In USSR it was a one living organism. What happened in Russia and Ukraine was that their industries were divided, in order to be privatized, and thus became unoperational. If Russia didn't have privatization, it would be in much better conditions now, and so would be Ukraine.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncle Joe View Post
    Countries that were west from USSR had a different economic structure. Economy of, say, Poland was relatively self-sufficient. However, economies of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine were closely integrated with each other. Another factor is that industry in post-Soviet Union was built in assertion that it is completly owned by the government. In USSR it was a one living organism. What happened in Russia and Ukraine was that their industries were divided, in order to be privatized, and thus became unoperational. If Russia didn't have privatization, it would be in much better conditions now, and so would be Ukraine.
    To be honest, it sounds more like those nations shouldn't have separated from Russia that soon. Self-determination and independence should take into account whether the state would have viable self-sufficiency. Privatization or not.
    Heir to Noble Savage in the Imperial House of Wilpuri

  16. #16

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    What do you expect? It was always a rural language; people in cities spoke Polish or Russian almost always.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sphere View Post
    It should be remembered that Belarus was the most industrialized, advanced and wealthy part of the Soviet union, and it does not have the ethnic tensions of other ex-Soviet Republics. In most any scenario it would have done reasonably well post-USSR, especially with its very high concentration of capital.
    The trick, though, is to not let this capital go down the drain like in Ukraine and elsewhere. The only reason Russia is better off is that there was simply more stuff and it would take longer to steal it all, by which time it was not out-of-control theft.

  17. #17

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Please stop posting lies, seriously that lie is just ridiculous. In 1989 Belarus was a backwater compared to Ukraine, Balticum and most of Russia.

    Actually, Belarus had been backwards since it was completely razed by the Germans during WW2.
    Take your beef up with Wikipedia, not me.

    The Belarusian economy was completely devastated by the events of the war. Most of the industry, including whole production plants were removed either to Russia or Germany. Industrial production of Belarus in 1945 amounted for less than 20% of its pre-war size. Most of the factories evacuated to Russia, with several spectacular exceptions, were not returned to Belarus after 1945. During the immediate postwar period, the Soviet Union first rebuilt and then expanded the BSSR's economy, with control always exerted exclusively from Moscow. During this time, Belarus became a major center of manufacturing in the western region of the USSR. Huge industrial objects like the BelAZ, MAZ, and the Minsk Tractor Plant were built in the country. The increase in jobs resulted in a huge immigrant population of Russians in Belarus. Russian became the official language of administration and the peasant class, which traditionally was the base for Belarusian nation, ceased to exist.[16]

  18. #18
    CarbEast's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The best place on planet Earth - Russia obviously.
    Posts
    1,053

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sphere View Post
    The Belarusian economy was completely devastated by the events of the war. Most of the industry, including whole production plants were removed either to Russia or Germany. Industrial production of Belarus in 1945 amounted for less than 20% of its pre-war size. Most of the factories evacuated to Russia, with several spectacular exceptions, were not returned to Belarus after 1945. During the immediate postwar period, the Soviet Union first rebuilt and then expanded the BSSR's economy, with control always exerted exclusively from Moscow. During this time, Belarus became a major center of manufacturing in the western region of the USSR. Huge industrial objects like the BelAZ, MAZ, and the Minsk Tractor Plant were built in the country. The increase in jobs resulted in a huge immigrant population of Russians in Belarus. Russian became the official language of administration and the peasant class, which traditionally was the base for Belarusian nation, ceased to exist.[16]
    Ahh, Minsk Traktor Plant, one of those very rare tractor plants in USSR that produced tractors...

    It's all in a day's work for bicycle repairman.

  19. #19

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sphere View Post
    Take your beef up with Wikipedia, not me.
    Yeah, the Minsk tractor works are actually significant. Everything rest is random compared to other Soviet republics, and the "peasent class has dissapeared" comment is a pure lie. Almost 9% of the Belarus GDP (PPP) comes from agriculture. That is over twice as high as most other countries.

    Fact is, Belarus was a relatievly poor region compared to Ukraine and Russia, but Ukraine and Russia were crippled by "wild capitalism".
    Last edited by Nikitn; September 22, 2010 at 04:07 AM.

  20. #20
    wilpuri's Avatar It Gets Worse.
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    The Weimar Republic
    Posts
    9,512

    Default Re: Belarus Elections: Change Possible?

    Belarus is interesting, for I know next to nothing about it.

    I've learned, to my grief, that the Belarusian language has been effectively replaced by Russian in the public spheres and in urban areas.
    The common culture of a tribe is a sign of its inner cohesion. But tribes are vanishing from the modern world, as are all forms of traditional society. Customs, practices, festivals, rituals and beliefs have acquired a flut and half-hearted quality which reflects our nomadic and rootless existence, predicated as we are on the global air-waves.

    ROGER SCRUTON, Modern Culture

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •