Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    GenAnnoyance's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Falkirk, Scotland
    Posts
    109

    Default Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    Hi, sorry if there is an answer to this somewhere else ( I did look, honestly).

    Playing as the Romani, I got the Polybian military reforms a while ago and was a little disappointed that I couldn't recruit the new units straight away, instead having to wait for my new MICs to be built- but that's just part of the game so no big deal. My city in Arretium was the first to start upgrading and when the building was half way complete I had a look to see the new toys I could play with and to my horror my beloved Principes and Triarii appeared to have lower stats when comparing them to what I could already recruit in Rome. Initially, I put this down to not showing the boosting effects of other buildings but now, many years later, all my MICs have been upgraded and sure enough when I recruit them their stats seem less effective.

    My question(s) are then, are Polybian units worse than Camillan or are there bonuses eluding my untrained eye and really I'm churning out death machines? And if they are worse, is it supposed to be this way?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    Principes have swords, so they have faster attack rates and higher lethality.

    Triarii are no longer pure hoplites, but more versatile.

    IIRC they are also both more heavily armoured, and have higher morale.

    There are lots of stats that don't show up on the unit card.

    Polybians are better than Camillians.


    Also, no reform took place overnight.

  3. #3
    Knonfoda's Avatar I came, I read, I wrote
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vindomora
    Posts
    2,716

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    From what I noticed in turn the Imperial legionaries seemed worse than the marian ones, despite not much having changed.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?
    Short answer: No.

    Longer answer: It's a myth arisen from the fact that certain Camillan units are better at certain specific tasks than their later counterparts. Triarii and Equites Romani are slightly worse overall after the reforms. Leves and Rorarii (IIRC) disappear. So much for the worse part.
    However, your other units gain increased AoR. Hastati and Principes gain additional armour and become better at assault tasks. With Velites, you get skirmishers that are more reliable than Leves, better armoured and also cooler looking.

    Your army as a whole loses some anti-cavalry potential but gains significantly more anti-infantry power. Armour increases on average (Skirmishers, Hastati, Principes), despite Triarii and Equites Romani losing one or two points.

  5. #5

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    Aren't they completly the same? (the imperial and marian)

  6. #6
    Knonfoda's Avatar I came, I read, I wrote
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vindomora
    Posts
    2,716

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    Quote Originally Posted by Anubis88 View Post
    Aren't they completly the same? (the imperial and marian)
    I checked before and after reforms and post marian infantry was slightly better than their imperial counterparts, maybe 1-2 less armour and attack I think.

  7. #7
    Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Southampton, UK
    Posts
    1,563

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    Nope, they are completely identical stat wise.

    Code:
    ;241
    type             roman infantry legionary cohort i
    dictionary       roman_infantry_legionary_cohort_i      ; Cohortes Reformata
    category         infantry
    class            heavy
    voice_type       General_1
    soldier          roman_infantry_cohorsreformata, 50, 0, 1.18
    officer          ebofficer_roman_centurion
    officer          ebofficer_roman_early_standard
    attributes       sea_faring, hide_forest, can_sap, hardy
    formation        1, 2, 2, 3, 5, square, testudo
    stat_health      1, 1
    stat_pri         4, 4, pilum, 35, 2, thrown, blade, piercing, spear, 15 ,1
    stat_pri_attr    prec, thrown, ap
    stat_sec         11, 4, no, 0, 0, melee, simple, piercing, sword, 0 ,0.13
    stat_sec_attr    no
    stat_pri_armour  10, 8, 4, metal
    stat_sec_armour  0, 0, flesh
    stat_heat        4
    stat_ground      0, 0, -2, -2
    stat_mental      14, disciplined, highly_trained
    stat_charge_dist 30
    stat_fire_delay  0
    stat_food        60, 300
    stat_cost        1, 1790, 448, 100, 160, 1790
    ownership        seleucid, slave
    Code:
    ;242
    type             roman infantry legionary cohort ii
    dictionary       roman_infantry_legionary_cohort_ii      ; Cohortes Imperatoria
    category         infantry
    class            heavy
    voice_type       General_1
    soldier          roman_infantry_cohorsimperatoria_evocata, 50, 0, 1.18
    officer          ebofficer_roman_centurion
    officer          ebofficer_roman_standard
    attributes       sea_faring, hide_forest, can_sap, hardy
    formation        1, 2, 2, 3, 5, square, testudo
    stat_health      1, 1
    stat_pri         4, 4, pilum, 35, 2, thrown, blade, piercing, spear, 15 ,1
    stat_pri_attr    prec, thrown, ap
    stat_sec         11, 4, no, 0, 0, melee, simple, piercing, sword, 0 ,0.13
    stat_sec_attr    no
    stat_pri_armour  10, 8, 4, metal
    stat_sec_armour  0, 0, flesh
    stat_heat        4
    stat_ground      0, 0, -2, -2
    stat_mental      14, disciplined, highly_trained
    stat_charge_dist 30
    stat_fire_delay  0
    stat_food        60, 300
    stat_cost        1, 1790, 448, 100, 160, 1790
    ownership        seleucid, slave
    Last edited by bobbin; August 22, 2010 at 12:40 PM.


  8. #8

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    Quote Originally Posted by Knonfoda View Post
    I checked before and after reforms and post marian infantry was slightly better than their imperial counterparts, maybe 1-2 less armour and attack I think.
    According to this they are completly the same
    http://europabarbarorum.heimstatt.net/

  9. #9
    GenAnnoyance's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Falkirk, Scotland
    Posts
    109

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    Thanks for the info. So my troops will be better at taking on the infantry orientated Sweboz but not so good when/if the steppe tribes come-a-callin'. I presume when the Marian reforms eventually come along, the legions will be nigh invincible?

  10. #10

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    Quote Originally Posted by GenAnnoyance View Post
    Thanks for the info. So my troops will be better at taking on the infantry orientated Sweboz but not so good when/if the steppe tribes come-a-callin'. I presume when the Marian reforms eventually come along, the legions will be nigh invincible?
    In numbers per unit and AOR, yes.

    They are by far the best line infantry unit in the game. There is still a lot out there that can seriously hurt them though.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    Quote Originally Posted by GenAnnoyance View Post
    Thanks for the info. So my troops will be better at taking on the infantry orientated Sweboz but not so good when/if the steppe tribes come-a-callin'.
    They'll still be able to defeat pretty much any cavalry unit head on. They just suffer from a spear shortage, which you can offset by hiring Gaeroas or other spear armed auxiliaries (Gaeroas make great garrison troops btw.).

  12. #12

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    for spearmen Samnite-Hastatii or Thurepodoi (sp) are the way to go.
    Also good are the Greek phalanx units (those white clad hoplites with sword).

    Loss off spearpower can be replaced easely with mercs and aor.
    Living in the Netherland but am a Frisian the noblest of Germans. NOW playing SAI Julian campaign, http://www.unihorn.nl
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent, Isaac Asimov
    F@ck de massa, grijp de Kassa, Bas Hoorn 2009

  13. #13

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    also remember your by the time the Polybian military reforms happens your Camillan units will probably have armour/weapon upgrades and some experience, making there states higher.

    I hope in EB2 they add a small window of say 4-8 turns were a small number of veteran (2-3 chevrons) Polybian units are available for hire in the merc pool, to represent experienced Camillan units being re-equipped as Polybian units.
    Balbor

    Former Creative Director
    Former Head Unit Modeller and Texture
    Fourth Age:Total War

  14. #14

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    I always felt bad disbanding my experienced Camillan Legions when the reforms come around.

    Seemed a shame to get rid of experienced soldiers and so most met their end in dangerous assaults, for the good of the Republic, of course.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Are Polybian units worse than Camillan?

    You can recruit Polybian units on a wider are than Camillians, i also think that they are slightly cheaper.

    Imperial troops are the same thing, stat wise they're not much better, but they're available in 50% of the cities in the game and have larger numbers.


    Plus, it's just a reform, it doesn't mean that they should become better at everything, they're more streamlined and pragmatic.

    Like the Americans, the Sherman wasn't the main battle tank because it was the best, it was because it was the most pragmatic and acessible one

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •