Last edited by Tiberios; July 31, 2010 at 08:06 AM.
I always thought they would forcibly convert the muslim Pakistani's to Hinduism and let it be annexed by India along with Kashmir of course
oh how funny!
I can giver source for Indian light machine guns allegation but just like others that would also be rejected, but here it is;
http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/0...-in-swat-fata/
"I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Saviour of Humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today." 'The Genuine Islam,' Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936.Sir George Bernard Shaw
Just check my post. There's very little probability the Americans are subverting Pakistan with the Baloch issue. In fact, most people don't even know who the hell Balochs are.
Heir to Noble Savage in the Imperial House of Wilpuri
"You have a decent ear for notes
but you can't yet appreciate harmony."
Could you provide a less biased source? Because this is quite biased.
I mean they have this on their site:
http://www.pakalertpress.com/2010/07...-in-the-world/
Israel did 9/11, how predictable and biased bs
Last edited by Tiberios; July 31, 2010 at 08:16 AM.
Leaks from America are indeed exposing some things America does not want us to know. Public sympathy with the war is about as low as possible. But anyone who is actually helping the Taleban directly is already being punished. Why we are in Afghanistan i have no idea, but since we are we have to finish what we started.
Which is why the newspapers and Wikileaks site did it for us. If you don't accept them then there's not much point arguing with you.Secondly not a single person has dragged the evidence from that site on this thread to make me easy to read and accept, I should not be supposed to ferret through thousands of document to find a one, single concrete evidence of Pakistani involvement.
Probably because we are signing a large nuclear deal with India and all we do to Pakistan is give you millions of pounds in aid. It's blatant philandering and corrupt dirty deals I know.Thirdly, if allies themselves are paying money to Taliban (for whatsoever purpose), if they are letting Indians spreading chaos in Baluchistan and if they do not stop continuous supply of weapons and ammunition and money to Pakistani Taliban, how can they complain about our "treachery"? Indian light machine guns were found in Swat and South Waziristan, what does this mean? Why are they being allowed to destabilize Pakistan from allies' occupied Afghanistan?
A new mobile phone tower went up in a town in the USA, and the local newspaper asked a number of people what they thought of it. Some said they noticed their cellphone reception was better. Some said they noticed the tower was affecting their health.
A local administrator was asked to comment. He nodded sagely, and said simply: "Wow. And think about how much more pronounced these effects will be once the tower is actually operational."
CopperKnickersII ! Fine give me some time to ferret through wikileaks. Secondly, what pounds or dollars we have received or are receiving is way less than what we have lost in this war which was not ours initially. So you people are not even in fact paying us accurately for our losses. What services we provided are still not paid. We at least deserved what Turkey was offered for Iraq invasion. If Allies' cannot stop continuous supply of weapons and ammunition from Afghanistan for Pakistani terrorists and/or separatists, they cannot allege us for supporting Taliban.
"I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Saviour of Humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today." 'The Genuine Islam,' Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936.Sir George Bernard Shaw
What was Turkey given exactly that makes it seem unfair?
The Allies aren't directly supporting the Taliban. Like I responded earlier, this was civilian contractors paying Taliban turncoats who play both sides for their own gain - thus aren't true Taliban. They only do that so it gets us better access to our own supply lines too.
Heir to Noble Savage in the Imperial House of Wilpuri
I replied to Copper Knickers II and I am waiting for "his" reply. Meanwhile let me say one thing for the lulz, fine we are supporting Taliban in kicking invaders' ass in Afghanistan, do what you can do, we are not Cambodia.
FutureFilmMaker! What about support of Pakistani insurgency and terrorism in North Waziristan from Afghanistan? American occupied Afghanistan? You know supplies of terrorists and/or separatists is coming from Afghanistan.
"I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Saviour of Humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today." 'The Genuine Islam,' Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936.Sir George Bernard Shaw
Then don't expect the 'evil west' to fund you. Personally i think it's incredibly short sighted of you. In you hatred of all things western your willing to support a regime that the Afghani people rejected and one that will oppress the personal freedoms of thousands of people.
But to put it in terms which perhaps a Pakistani such as yourself can understand. Do you really think that if the Taliban win in Afghanistan they won't try to achieve the same in Pakistan. You are already struggling to contain your existing insurgents.
"You have a decent ear for notes
but you can't yet appreciate harmony."
You are a bad guy
no I am not
you are a bad guy
I am telling you I am not
no you are
fine I am a bad guy, *Beeeeeeeep*
but you shouldn't be
"I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Saviour of Humanity. I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world, he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today." 'The Genuine Islam,' Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936.Sir George Bernard Shaw