Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 139

Thread: Iraq from a Marine's Perspective.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    {nF}remix's Avatar Wii will change gaming
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Fre@kmont, California
    Posts
    2,050

    Default Iraq from a Marine's Perspective.

    I saw this from another forum :

    http://www.australianalliedforces.co...opic.php?t=508

    Stolen from another forum I'm on:

    Hello to all my fellow gunners, military buffs, veterans and interested guys. A couple of weekends ago I got to spend time with my son Jordan, who was on his first leave since returning from Iraq. He is well (a little thin), and already bored. He will be returning to Iraq for a second tour in early '06 and has already re-enlisted early for 4 more years. He loves the Marine Corps and is actually looking forward to returning to Iraq.

    Jordan spent 7 months at "Camp Blue Diamond" in Ramadi. Aka: Fort Apache. He saw and did a lot and the following is what he told me about weapons, equipment, tactics and other miscellaneous info which may be of interest to you. Nothing is by any means classified. No politics here, just a Marine with a bird's eye view's opinions:

    1) The M-16 rifle : Thumbs down. Chronic jamming problems with the talcum powder like sand over there. The sand is everywhere. Jordan says you feel filthy 2 minutes after coming out of the shower. The M-4 carbine version is more popular because it's lighter and shorter, but it has jamming problems also. They like the ability to mount the various optical gunsights and weapons lights on the picattiny rails, but the weapon itself is not great in a desert environment. They all hate the 5.56mm (.223) round. Poor penetration on the cinderblock structure common over there and even torso hits cant be reliably counted on to put the enemy down. Fun fact: Random autopsies on dead insurgents shows a high level of opiate use.

    2) The M243 SAW (squad assault weapon): .223 cal. Drum fed light machine gun. Big thumbs down. Universally considered a piece of ****. Chronic jamming problems, most of which require partial disassembly. (that's fun in the middle of a firefight).

    3) The M9 Beretta 9mm: Mixed bag. Good gun, performs well in desert environment; but they all hate the 9mm cartridge. The use of handguns for self-defense is actually fairly common. Same old story on the 9mm: Bad guys hit multiple times and still in the fight.

    4) Mossberg 12ga. Military shotgun: Works well, used frequently for clearing houses to good effect.

    5) The M240 Machine Gun: 7.62 Nato (.30 cal. belt fed machine gun, developed to replace the old M-60 (what a beautiful weapon that was!!). Thumbs up. Accurate, reliable, and the 7.62 round puts 'em down. Originally developed as a vehicle mounted weapon, more and more are being dismounted and taken into the field by infantry. The 7.62 round chews up the structure over there.

    6) The M2 .50 cal heavy machine gun: Thumbs way, way up. "Ma deuce" is still worth her considerable weight in gold. The ultimate fight stopper, puts their dicks in the dirt every time. The most coveted weapon in-theater.

    7) The .45 pistol: Thumbs up. Still the best pistol round out there. Everybody authorized to carry a sidearm is trying to get their hands on one. With few exceptions, can reliably be expected to put 'em down with a torso hit. The special ops guys (who are doing most of the pistol work) use the HK military model and supposedly love it. The old government model .45's are being re-issued en masse.

    The M-14: Thumbs up. They are being re-issued in bulk, mostly in a modified version to special ops guys. Modifications include lightweight Kevlar stocks and low power red dot or ACOG sights. Very reliable in the sandy environment, and they love the 7.62 round.

    9) The Barrett .50 cal sniper rifle: Thumbs way up. Spectacular range and accuracy and hits like a freight train. Used frequently to take out vehicle suicide bombers ( we actually stop a lot of them) and barricaded enemy. Definitely here to stay.

    10) The M24 sniper rifle: Thumbs up. Mostly in .308 but some in 300 win mag. Heavily modified Remington 700's. Great performance. Snipers have been used heavily to great effect. Rumor has it that a marine sniper on his third tour in Anbar province has actually exceeded Carlos Hathcock's record for confirmed kills with OVER 100.

    11) The new body armor: Thumbs up. Relatively light at approx. 6 lbs. and can reliably be expected to soak up small shrapnel and even will stop an AK-47 round. The bad news: Hot as **** to wear, almost unbearable in the summer heat (which averages over 120 degrees). Also, the enemy now goes for head shots whenever possible. All the :wub: about the "old" body armor making our guys vulnerable to the IED's was a non-starter. The IED explosions are enormous and body armor doesn't make any difference at all in most cases.

    12) Night Vision and Infrared Equipment: Thumbs way up. Spectacular performance. Our guys see in the dark and own the night, period. Very little enemy action after evening prayers. More and more enemy being whacked at night during movement by our hunter-killer teams. We've all seen the videos.

    13) Lights: Thumbs up. Most of the weapon mounted and personal lights are Surefire's, and the troops love 'em. Invaluable for night urban operations. Jordan carried a $34 Surefire G2 on a neck lanyard and loved it.

    I cant help but notice that most of the good fighting weapons and ordnance are 50 or more years old!!!!!!!!! With all our technology, it's the WWII and Vietnam era weapons that everybody wants!!!! The infantry fighting is frequent, up close and brutal. No quarter is given or shown.

    Bad guy weapons:

    1) Mostly AK47's . The entire country is an arsenal. Works better in the desert than the M16 and the .308 Russian round kills reliably. PKM belt fed light machine guns are also common and effective. Luckily, the enemy mostly shoots like ****. Undisciplined "spray and pray" type fire. However, they are seeing more and more precision weapons, especially sniper rifles. (Iran, again) Fun fact: Captured enemy have apparently marveled at the marksmanship of our guys and how hard they fight. They are apparently told in Jihad school that the Americans rely solely on technology, and can be easily beaten in close quarters combat for their lack of toughness. Let's just say they know better now.

    2) The RPG: Probably the infantry weapon most feared by our guys. Simple, reliable and as common as dogshit. The enemy responded to our up-armored humvees by aiming at the windshields, often at point blank range. Still killing a lot of our guys.

    3) The IED: The biggest killer of all. Can be anything from old Soviet anti-armor mines to jury rigged artillery shells. A lot found in Jordan's area were in abandoned cars. The enemy would take 2 or 3 155mm artillery shells and wire them together. Most were detonated by cell phone, and the explosions are enormous. You're not safe in any vehicle, even an M1 tank. Driving is by far the most dangerous thing our guys do over there. Lately, they are much more sophisticated "shape charges" (Iranian) specifically designed to penetrate armor. Fact: Most of the ready made IED's are supplied by Iran, who is also providing terrorists (Hezbollah types) to train the insurgents in their use and tactics. That's why the attacks have been so deadly lately. Their concealment methods are ingenious, the latest being shape charges in Styrofoam containers spray painted to look like the cinderblocks that litter all Iraqi roads. We find about 40% before they detonate, and the bomb
    disposal guys are unsung heroes of this war.

    4) Mortars and rockets: Very prevalent. The soviet era 122mm rockets (with an 18km range) are becoming more prevalent. One of Jordan's NCO's lost a leg to one. These weapons cause a lot of damage "inside the wire". Jordan's base was hit almost daily his entire time there by mortar and rocket fire, often at night to disrupt sleep patterns and cause fatigue (It did). More of a psychological weapon than anything else. The enemy mortar teams would jump out of vehicles, fire a few rounds, and then haul ass in a matter of seconds.

    5) Bad guy technology: Simple yet effective. Most communication is by cell and satellite phones, and also by email on laptops. They use handheld GPS units for navigation and "Google earth" for overhead views of our positions. Their weapons are good, if not fancy, and prevalent. Their explosives and bomb technology is TOP OF THE LINE. Night vision is rare. They are very careless with their equipment and the captured GPS units and laptops are treasure troves of Intel when captured.

    Who are the bad guys?:

    Most of the carnage is caused by the Zarqawi Al Qaeda group. They operate mostly in Anbar province (Fallujah and Ramadi). These are mostly "foreigners", non-Iraqi Sunni Arab Jihadists from all over the Muslim world (and Europe). Most enter Iraq through Syria (with, of course, the knowledge and complicity of the Syrian govt.) , and then travel down the "rat line" which is the trail of towns along the Euphrates River that we've been hitting hard for the last few months. Some are virtually untrained young Jihadists that often end up as suicide bombers or in "sacrifice squads". Most, however, are hard core terrorists from all the usual suspects (Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas etc.) These are the guys running around murdering civilians en masse and cutting heads off. The Chechens (many of whom are Caucasian), are supposedly the most ruthless and the best fighters. (they have been fighting the Russians for years). In the Baghdad area and south, most of the insurgents are
    Iranian inspired (and led) Iraqi Shiites. The Iranian Shiia have been very adept at infiltrating the Iraqi local govt.'s, the police forces and the Army. The have had a massive spy and agitator network there since the Iran-Iraq war in the early 80's. Most of the Saddam loyalists were killed, captured or gave up long ago.

    Bad Guy Tactics:

    When they are engaged on an infantry level they get their asses kicked every time. Brave, but stupid. Suicidal Banzai-type charges were very common earlier in the war and still occur. They will literally sacrifice 8-10 man teams in suicide squads by sending them screaming and firing Ak's and RPG's directly at our bases just to probe the defenses. They get mowed down like grass every time. ( see the M2 and M240 above). Jordan's base was hit like this often. When engaged, they have a tendency to flee to the same building, probably for what they think will be a glorious last stand. Instead, we call in air and that's the end of that more often than not. These hole-ups are referred to as Alpha Whiskey Romeo's (Allah's Waiting Room). We have the laser guided ground-air thing down to a science. The fast mover's, mostly Marine F-18's, are taking an ever increasing toll on the enemy. When caught out in the open, the helicopter gunships and AC-130 Spectre gunships cut them
    to ribbons with cannon and rocket fire, especially at night. Interestingly, artillery is hardly used at all. Fun fact: The enemy death toll is supposedly between 45-50 thousand. That is why we're seeing less and less infantry attacks and more IED, suicide bomber ****. The new strategy is simple: attrition.

    The insurgent tactic most frustrating is their use of civilian non-combatants as cover. They know we do all we can to avoid civilian casualties and therefore schools, hospitals and (especially) Mosques are locations where they meet, stage for attacks, cache weapons and ammo and flee to when engaged. They have absolutely no regard whatsoever for civilian casualties. They will terrorize locals and murder without hesitation anyone believed to be sympathetic to the Americans or the new Iraqi govt. Kidnapping of family members (especially children) is common to influence people they are trying to influence but cant reach, such as local govt. officials, clerics, tribal leaders, etc.).

    The first thing our guys are told is "don't get captured". They know that if captured they will be tortured and beheaded on the internet. Zarqawi openly offers bounties for anyone who brings him a live American serviceman. This motivates the criminal element who otherwise don't give a **** about the war. A lot of the beheading victims were actually kidnapped by common criminals and sold to Zarqawi. As such, for our guys, every fight is to the death. Surrender is not an option.

    The Iraqi's are a mixed bag. Some fight well, others aren't worth a ****. Most do okay with American support. Finding leaders is hard, but they are getting better. It is widely viewed that Zarqawi's use of suicide bombers, en masse, against the civilian population was a serious tactical mistake. Many Iraqi's were galvanized and the caliber of recruits in the Army and the police forces went up, along with their motivation. It also led to an exponential increase in good intel because the Iraqi's are sick of the insurgent attacks against civilians. The Kurds are solidly pro-American and fearless fighters.

    According to Jordan, morale among our guys is very high. They not only believe they are winning, but that they are winning decisively. They are stunned and dismayed by what they see in the American press, whom they almost universally view as against them. The embedded reporters are despised and distrusted. They are inflicting casualties at a rate of 20-1 and then see **** like "Are we losing in Iraq" on TV and the print media. For the most part, they are satisfied with their equipment, food and leadership. Bottom line though, and they all say this, there are not enough guys there to drive the final stake through the heart of the insurgency, primarily because there aren't enough troops in-theater to shut down the borders with Iran and Syria. The Iranians and the Syrians just cant stand the thought of Iraq being an American ally (with, of course, permanent US bases there).

    Interesting, no?

  2. #2
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default

    Great article is all I can say.
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  3. #3

    Default

    According to Jordan, morale among our guys is very high. They not only believe they are winning, but that they are winning decisively. They are stunned and dismayed by what they see in the American press, whom they almost universally view as against them. The embedded reporters are despised and distrusted. They are inflicting casualties at a rate of 20-1 and then see **** like "Are we losing in Iraq" on TV and the print media. For the most part, they are satisfied with their equipment, food and leadership. Bottom line though, and they all say this, there are not enough guys there to drive the final stake through the heart of the insurgency, primarily because there aren't enough troops in-theater to shut down the borders with Iran and Syria. The Iranians and the Syrians just cant stand the thought of Iraq being an American ally (with, of course, permanent US bases there).
    Perhaps they are not seeing the big picture... very interesting read. And, quite interesting to see that a marine who has been in Iraq and has come back, still wants to go back, and is going back. :wink:
    Under the wing of Nihil - Under my claws; Farnan, Ummon, & Ecclesiastes.

    Human beings will be happier — not when they cure cancer or get to Mars or eliminate racial prejudice or flush Lake Erie — but when they find ways to inhabit primitive communities again. That’s my utopia.
    Kurt Vonnegut

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jesus The Inane
    Perhaps they are not seeing the big picture... very interesting read. And, quite interesting to see that a marine who has been in Iraq and has come back, still wants to go back, and is going back. :wink:
    I'm not a marine, though I have served in Iraq.

    Trust me. You see the big picture.

    Not the one CNN or Al Jazeera wants you to see...but the cold hard truth.

    We fight evil and we are winning.
    -Attalus-
    Fool me once...shame on you
    Fool me twice...prepare to die

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Attalus
    I'm not a marine, though I have served in Iraq.

    Trust me. You see the big picture.

    Not the one CNN or Al Jazeera wants you to see...but the cold hard truth.

    We fight evil and we are winning.
    Just curious...but what is the general behavior of U.S. service-members towards Islam?

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Honor&Glory
    Just curious...but what is the general behavior of U.S. service-members towards Islam?
    I've pm'ed you.
    -Attalus-
    Fool me once...shame on you
    Fool me twice...prepare to die

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Attalus
    I've pm'ed you.
    You can't answer his question in an open forum?

  8. #8
    {nF}remix's Avatar Wii will change gaming
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Fre@kmont, California
    Posts
    2,050

    Default

    yeah really shcoked me, i never knew that they were attacked daily by insurgents with mortar and infantry banzai charges. I always though it was a breeze for the marines because of superior technology and air power, and that the insurgents would barely attack full frontal.

    Now this article tells me how really life is down there, really interesting. Must be exiting yet scary. Interesting to see that most troops there believe they are winning but the media's views differ...

  9. #9
    Farnan's Avatar Saviors of the Japanese
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Right behind you starring over your shoulder.
    Posts
    31,638

    Default

    With those Banzai charges it look like Washington and Pals may have a busy few years...http://www.strategypage.com/humor/articles/20020206.asp
    “The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”

    —Sir William Francis Butler

  10. #10

    Default

    This belongs in the mudpit guys.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jesus The Inane
    Perhaps they are not seeing the big picture... very interesting read. And, quite interesting to see that a marine who has been in Iraq and has come back, still wants to go back, and is going back. :wink:
    Interesting maybe, but not rare in the slightest. They are having something upwards to 80%-90% reenlistment.
    Faithfully under the patronage of the fallen yet rather amiable Octavian.

    Smile! The better the energy you put in, the better the energy you will get out.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Alameda
    Interesting maybe, but not rare in the slightest. They are having something upwards to 80%-90% reenlistment.
    Yeah...recruitment rates are down, but re-enlistment rates are up.

  12. #12

    Default

    Could it be, then, that the experience of war is not as bad as some people claim it to be? Atleast for volunter soldiers... I mean, some people make joining the army seem like you ended your life right there on the spot.

    Adrenaline junkies.

    EDIT: LOL Farnan!
    Under the wing of Nihil - Under my claws; Farnan, Ummon, & Ecclesiastes.

    Human beings will be happier — not when they cure cancer or get to Mars or eliminate racial prejudice or flush Lake Erie — but when they find ways to inhabit primitive communities again. That’s my utopia.
    Kurt Vonnegut

  13. #13

    Default

    Quite simply the media nowadays simply are trying to get everyone to think the us is losing in order too get good ratings.A funny thing is that in the old days alot of reporters nowadays would be shot for treason,i have to wonder why the us army hasnt asked google earth to shut down its iraqi sections to keep iraqis from seeing what the us are doing

    Let's just hope they were fascist communist kittens who were on their way to international fascist communist fair.

  14. #14
    John I Tzimisces's Avatar Get born again.
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    New England, US
    Posts
    12,494

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by humvee2800
    Quite simply the media nowadays simply are trying to get everyone to think the us is losing in order too get good ratings.A funny thing is that in the old days alot of reporters nowadays would be shot for treason,i have to wonder why the us army hasnt asked google earth to shut down its iraqi sections to keep iraqis from seeing what the us are doing
    There is no business in good news. The media therefore sensationalizes bad news because more people are drawn to that kind of thing. Almost like a train wreck: you don't want to, but you can't help but stare.

  15. #15
    Mack Daddy's Avatar Tiro
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Buffalo, NewYork
    Posts
    219

    Default

    Very interesting. Glad to hear that our boys really feel like they can handle this.

  16. #16
    John I Tzimisces's Avatar Get born again.
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    New England, US
    Posts
    12,494

    Default

    A friend of mine, whose brother is a marine scout sniper, says you will get varying reports on the insurgency in Iraq...national guardsmen will give you a negative account, whilst Marines would be gung-ho about how disorganized they are and how bad they are at shooting...

  17. #17

    Default

    When engaged, they have a tendency to flee to the same building, probably for what they think will be a glorious last stand. Instead, we call in air and that's the end of that more often than not. These hole-ups are referred to as Alpha Whiskey Romeo's (Allah's Waiting Room).
    Now that's funny!

    They are inflicting casualties at a rate of 20-1 and then see **** like "Are we losing in Iraq" on TV and the print media.
    Hmmm: big picture vs small picture. Of course they are inflicting casualties, out-gun the muj, are better trained, fight better etc etc. That doesn't mean the US is winning or neccesarily likely to win. This is why every time I hear these 'I know a guy who's just come back from Iraq and he says we're winning and the media is wrong' anecdotes they don't carry much weight. In an asymmetrical war the conventional force always feels it is kicking butt. Ask the Soviets about their massive kill rates in Afghanistan, but how did that end? Ditto for body counts in Vietnam.

    Quote Originally Posted by humvee2800
    Quite simply the media nowadays simply are trying to get everyone to think the us is losing in order too get good ratings.
    Quote Originally Posted by eXc|Imperator
    There is no business in good news.
    This is simply untrue - there's huge business in good news, especially when that good news is flag-wrapped, stirring, patriotic stuff about our brave boys beating the forces of evil. That stuff sells like hotcakes. This garbage about how everything is going splendidly in Iraq and it's just the wicked media telling lies is in total defiance of ALL in the information coming out of Iraq, not just the stuff in the mainstream, commerical (and commerically-driven) media.

    The insurgency which was supposed to be 'in it's last throes' is anything but. The few 'regime dead-enders' have been joined by nationalists, Iranian-backed guerrillas, jihadists and hardcore terrorists. Killing lots of them hasn't brought about a decline in attacks. Sweeps of hot-spots in force only force the insurgency underground or cause the insurgents to move, to fight again elsewhere. There is no foreseeable way to strike a killing blow and pure attrition-through-firepower isn't working and is unlikely to work.

    Military analysts (when not filtered by Pentagon and White House spin-meisters), international affairs experts and intelligence services agree on all these things - the big picture stuff. Most of that isn't perceptible from a grunt's-eye-view.

    This 'the media is stabbing us in the back' stuff is an exercise in straw-grasping. If the big-picture news was as rosy as the straw-graspers would like us to believe, then the media would be reporting it because it would sell, sell, sell. They aren't reporting that because, however it looks tactically on the ground, the big picture is bleak and short on new options.
    Last edited by ThiudareiksGunthigg; November 16, 2005 at 04:26 AM.

  18. #18
    Templedog's Avatar Biarchus
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    underground
    Posts
    698

    Default

    I'm just wondering why it starts off as his Dad talking, then the point of view starts saying " we " in the first person then in the last paragraph it closes back as the Dads point of view.

    this is a fake post or Jordan wrote some of it.

    Nothing is by any means classified. No politics here, just a Marine with a bird's eye view's opinions:



    I use to be in Operation Yellow Elephant , and I am aware of young repubs [ http://www.yrnf.com/ ] doing these things.

    But if it is fake, there could be a true story someone has like this anyways.
    Last edited by Templedog; November 16, 2005 at 03:47 AM.


    They got lucky and hijacked some airplanes. I could of done that drunk. War on terror is BS.

  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Templedog
    this is a fake post or Jordan wrote some of it.
    Maybe. The fact that the post only talks about 'foreign fighters' and Iranian-backed Shi'ites, but makes no mention of indigenous insurgents is slightly suspicious and definitely rather odd. Al-Ramadi is 100 kms west of Baghdad and firmly in the Sunni Triangle. 'Al Qeda in Iraq' is certainly operating in this region, but their attacks tend to be aimed more at stirring up divisions between Sunnis, Shi'ites and (to a lesser extent) Kurds and at deterring Sunni 'collaborators' from joining the new Iraqi Army and police force. US military intelligence estimates they only form 10% or less of the insurgency and that their operations are more against Iraqi civilian targets than against the occupiers.

    The idea of large numbers of Iranian-backed Shi'ites operating in this area is even more unusual. But the fact that this post doesn't even bother to mention the guys who form the overwhelming bulk of insurgents in this area and in Iraq overall - native Iraqi Sunnis - is extremely strange.

    It's almost as though this post is playing on the idea that the insurgency is not an indigenous movement at all, but is purely Iranian, Syrian and Al Qeda in origin. This is completely contrary to the assessment of US military intelligence and reporting from this region.

    This is not to say this (upbeat) post is definitely fake, but if it isn't, it seems to have a political agenda. To 'report' on the insurgency in Al-Ramadi and totally neglect to mention the primary forces involved in attacks on US forces is rather weird, to say the very least.

  20. #20
    Civitate
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,965

    Default

    The article was a great read until it got to the part about the "bad guys". This should be taken for what it is, the view of a soldier on his enemies. It is a biased view. All that talk about the media lying is rubbish, the media gets its information from various sources first and second hand and looks at the bigger picture. The Marine has only two sources: his senses (i.e what he sees and hears) and what the army tells him.

    The discalimer about it not being political is rubbish too, it is definetely political in the last few paragraphs.

    Perhaps they are not seeing the big picture... very interesting read. And, quite interesting to see that a marine who has been in Iraq and has come back, still wants to go back, and is going back.
    Could it be, then, that the experience of war is not as bad as some people claim it to be? Atleast for volunter soldiers... I mean, some people make joining the army seem like you ended your life right there on the spot.
    Of course they want to go back, war is their life as long as the war in Iraq continues. It doesn't mean war is not that bad, it just means the marine is following his responsibilty as a soldier. If you like blind loyalties, feeling righteous and strong than the Army is for you. (I'm not mocking these things, infact they are needed for a good soldier). Me on the other hand I only fight if there is no other choice.
    "In bourgeois society capital is independent and has individuality, while the living person is dependent and has no individuality." - Karl Marx on Capitalism
    Under the patronage of the venerable Marshal Qin. Proud member of the house of Sybian.

    Proud member of the Australian-New Zealand Beer Appreciation Society (ANZBAS)

Page 1 of 7 1234567 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •