Guatemala...

[Pra]

The situtation has a potentiality to turn ugly. We could face a lot of deaths, yet does giving them food and money solve the problem of long-term poverty that will grip the country? Is it better to let them pick themselves up and develop their own infrastructure or invest and help build it, but create a psuedo-dependant state.

Guatemala faces hunger 'timebomb'
Parts of Guatemala are facing a starvation "timebomb" in the aftermath of Hurricane Stan, the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) has warned.
Hundreds of people were buried by landslides after a week of intense rains in early October.

But Trevor Rowe of the WFP says there are fears even more may die from malnutrition unless they get help soon.

"We suspect that by the end of the year most people's food will have run out," he says.

"We're talking about subsistence farmers, who live a hand-to-mouth existence."

Aid shortage

Many farmers had lost many or all of their crops, or even lost their land altogether, he told the BBC News website.

"There's concern they will be facing a severe hunger crisis" if international aid is not forthcoming, he added.

The WFP has launched an appeal for $14.1m (£8m) to help feed 285,000 people over a six-month period.

Mr Rowe said only $4.5m had been raised so far, from three countries: the US ($3.5m), Norway and Switzerland.

"The severity of the hurricane hasn't been fully grasped yet," he said.

"Compared to Hurricane Mitch [in 1998], the impact on Guatemala is much worse."

Another Niger?

He said even before Stan arrived, Guatemala had chronic child malnutrition of 50%, with 80% in some areas.

"The bottom line is that these people will not be in a position to cope by the end of the year.

"Without the necessary food aid to help them these people are severely vulnerable.

"What we want is to avoid what happened in Niger," he said, referring to the famine in West Africa that was predicted by the WFP and others, but only got international attention and donations when pictures of starving victims appeared on TV in July, when it was too late for many.

The situation in Guatemala, he says, "is a timebomb waiting to go off... the fuse is lit".

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/h...as/4426240.stm

Published: 2005/11/10 18:30:11 GMT

© BBC MMV

[TIGERCAT]

Dude just illegally immigrate to the United States; everybody else is
south of the border. We don't even have border guards with
Mexico.

[Mr Jones]

This is tough. My conscious screams "Give them aid!", and i think that we should indeed give them aid, but there is also a negative aspect to this. Inviting other countries (specifically the USA) into another country to help is not necessarily a good idea. US neo-imperialism is already bad enough in south and central america without inviting them in to organise a massive aid program. of course, allowing, say, Cuba in to deliver aid also may have the same negative effect. I think immediate aid should be given by agencies such as, say, the International Red Cross. Despite the fact that this is only a temporary solution it is preferable to allowing another country to get in and develop the infastructure themselves. To allow Guatemala to develop a stable economy and infastructure itself would require massive changes in the foreign policy of many nations and the stablishment of a more equal trading scheme where by the developing nations are not ripped off by the richer ones.