Not surprisingly inquisitors and the pope started to get on my nerves. This is nothing new here. Several threads, same discussion - some of you are annoyed (like me), some defend the game mechanics, because religion and the pope have been more influential in the middle ages.
I disagree with this point of view.
First of all, Inquisitors never, ever assassinated Kings or the gentry.
Second, the popes used excommunication, but they used it not every time someone waged war. They used it to suit their politics, true, but they always needed a reason - in my case Milan attacked me, I fought back, the pope ordered a ceasefire, during wich Milan attacked again and again without any problems with the pope. At the end of the ceasefire I attacked - and the pope immediately intervened again. Absolutely not historical. In fact excommunacated Emperors even managed to force the pope to quit the excommunication.
My third point - unless a new player is told about the pope/inquisitor problem, he'll gets the same problems, gets frustrated and annoyed. What good is this for?
Both pope and Inquisitors seem to be a way to avoid the player getting to strong to soon, but there are better, more historical ways - rebellion. Most medieval wars were between the ruler and his barons, not his neighbours.
MTW2 is a good game with interesting factions (in this case better than RTW), but the pope/inquisitor problem needs to be fixed.






Reply With Quote








