You can give Bosnia orthodox churches to satisfy also the serbs players for Bosnia because it is a little bit "sensitive" to not include them. If you want to be historical correct then in Bosnia (so without hum) there should not be any orthodox churches; because about this fact the most important "Serbian medieval historians agree". For examples just some quoutes from those serbian historians. And do not understand me wrong: I really do not care and IT IS TOTALLY NOT IMPORTANT FOR ME AS A BOSNIAN. If those guys want to; then they can also build a budhistic temple at Bobovac. Now as I said:
Vladimir Corovic:
p.s.; Vladimir Corovic is known as the "national serb historian" or the most important one.There is no proofe that in Bosnia existed a orthodox church before the arrival of the Turks. They only remainings of the orthodox church were found in Hum and it is most likely that this are the only one at the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Then Dinic:
Translation:Ne treba gubiti iz vida, da u pravoj Bosni, Hum i dijelovi Rasa se izuzimaju.Misli se na Prijepolje, Milesevu nije bilo u Tvrtkovog doba pravoslavnih.Za nas je ovo pitanje definitivno reseno.
All the other serb historians are concluding the same. This is historical correct. In hum there were orthodox christians and a monestry. In Bosnia there were not. (Bosnia is the territory from the period of let's say Ban Kulin, Ninoslav etc. But I understand that if you want to build churches of the orthodox faith in Bosnia to satisfy also our bosnian serb gamers; then it's ok with me. I am here only for the history and I hope that I helped you a little bit.We should not lose out of mind that in real Bosnia Hum and parts of Rasa (Prijepolje and Miliseva are meant with this) are excluded; there were no orthodox christians in the time of Tvrtko. This question is tottaly answered for us as historians.