Seriously, this is just ridiculous.
If I want to marry more than person (I don't and won't btw) why should I be stopped?
Seriously, this is just ridiculous.
If I want to marry more than person (I don't and won't btw) why should I be stopped?
Because it's not normal.
1. With plain and choppers it is.
2. Back then it was normal, but not now.
think how hard it is with just 1![]()
You only have one pair of ears anyways. And most men aren't up to multitasking![]()
This is one area where Muslims may have it right:
1 wife: obvious results.
2 wives: continuous catfight.
3 wives: devolves into 2 eldest abusing the youngest.
4 wives: even balance of power.
Naturally, we'd need to do something with all them bachelors...maybe give them dynamite vests and send them to Afghanistan for a little payback?
...in all seriousness, the surplus bachelor problem is probably why 1:1 ratios are so common across cultures. When available females become rare, competition btwn males increases, and cuckolding becomes a viable reproductive strategy. I'm guessing this'd also encourage the occurence of rape and murder.
Giving tax breaks to the wealthy, is like giving free dessert coupons to the morbidly obese.
IDIOT BASTARD SON of MAVERICK
Because our countries were formed in the wake of a puritan society.
Originally Posted by Hunter S. Thompson
One thing is for certain: the more profoundly baffled you have been in your life, the more open your mind becomes to new ideas.
-Neil deGrasse Tyson
Let's think the unthinkable, let's do the undoable. Let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all.
I think to be honest the main reason these days is that it leads to many tax loopholes and social problems. Not something you cant deal with, but imagine a rich guy decides he wants 100 wives who are living in luxury, and it turns out that he goes into debt and loses all of his money and dies... whos going to care for all the widows? are they all going to get support from the government?
"If you can't get rid of the skeleton in your closet, you'd best teach it to dance." - George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950)
this is why I think marriage should be between one man and one woman for raising children.
I don't beleive homosexuals or polygamorous people should be allowed to raise children, so they shouldn't be allowed to marry. Not that I have anything against them doing whatever they awnt to do.
I mean, you wouldn't let a bunch of friends raise a child, so why let anyone but what you consider to be the optimum type of parents raise children? I think heterosexual monogamorous couples are best for that.
How would a gay couple be worse than a single parent in providing for a kid? What's more, larger families = larger safety net.
Western culture is actually not very good at producing mentally balanced individuals, mainly due to the dual income family breakdown of responsibilities. In place of dedicated parents to correct behaviors and develop brains, we typically use: TV, public school, medication, daycare facilities, etc. Most other cultures rely upon larger in-groups (families, clans, villages, whatever), performing hands-on parenting.I mean, you wouldn't let a bunch of friends raise a child, so why let anyone but what you consider to be the optimum type of parents raise children? I think heterosexual monogamorous couples are best for that.
Kids need the human touch, but we're too busy earning $ to pay for the substitution services! One of the most messed up kids I've ever known (unaffectionately known as "sugarpacket" for stealing/binging on sugar), his ma's salary must've barely covered his daycare/summer camp...so why the hell didn't she just stay at home?
...except they're too busy fighting with each other to concentrate on the husband, while pissing him off scores the daughter no points at all.Originally Posted by Bernem
Elegant, really.
Giving tax breaks to the wealthy, is like giving free dessert coupons to the morbidly obese.
IDIOT BASTARD SON of MAVERICK
Somewhere a line has to be drawn. Some do so by sticking with one partner, for others even bestiality is fine.
A serious relationship is the most intense and rewarding experience a human can have, by having more than one partner you devalue him/her.
Sacrifices belong to us, and they define us- in a good way.
All too often the "fight for personal freedom" and "individuality" is in reality nothing more than a convenient excuse for the loss of morals.
Last edited by Amagi; June 09, 2010 at 09:03 PM.
Divorce rates would really boom out of control.
Leave it to the modder to perfect the works of the paid developers for no profit at all.
It's mostly the result of our entire societies being build on the basis of small, exclusive family units. Allowing same sex marriages doesn't really change anything about that, except some wording.
Legalizing polygamy would entail drastic changes in taxation, inheritance and custodianship rights,... Plus the demand isn't really there.
Actually, there is only ONE serious objection towards polygamy!
The linear increase of mothers in LAW!
One wife --> one mother in law (bad enough)
two wives --> two mothers (OMG)
4 mothers in law: epic overkill!!!!!4 wives: even balance of power.