After reading in several forums, I am confused.
What is definitely true:
1. Units get experience by killing and not being killed (not true, if the inexperienced soldiers are dying and the experienced remain - see 2.)
2. Every soldier in a unit has his own experience. The majority determines the experience of the unit.
3. Killing routing/"fighting to the death" soldiers gives only 20% XP points.
However, in some areas opinions differ:
Retraining:
4.a. New recruits are inexperienced.
4.b. New recruits have the same level as the unit in retraining.
Merging units:
5.a. Experience level can drop/rise depending on the units involved.
5.b. There is an exploit where you merge a higher ranked unit into a lower ranked one (I think this is the only possible direction?) and both units ALWAYS get/keep the high experience level, regardless of the number of men transferred and their individual experience level. Exploit would only be usable if 4.b. were true.
What are your opinions/experiences on this topic? What is the best way to gain experience?
Retraining or merging? Situation dependent (strength, experience of the units involved - close together or far apart)?
Retraining often, even if the unit only sustained minimal losses, or more rarely?
Do other factors influence experience gaining? :
Number of battles
Type of victory
Opponent strength (outnumbered or not)
Not only killing single soldiers but routing a whole unit
Presence of a general (possibly with specific traits) on the battlefield
There was one particular case when I laid siege to a city with only 42 cav as garrison. I went in with hoplites, killed them all with minimal losses. The hoplites did not gain experience...but the archers, that stood idly in front of the walls and picking their noses went up one chevron...WTF? They had not a single loss, kill - not any involvement at all.




Reply With Quote





