Siberian Intervention? Great game with Britain, who started spreading anti-Russian propaganda around it's colonial Empire? Crimean War? Napoleon?
Siberian Intervention? Great game with Britain, who started spreading anti-Russian propaganda around it's colonial Empire? Crimean War? Napoleon?
Next time try Wikipedia first: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Russian_sentiment
Ever since the Bolsheviks took power. In fact right after WWI Britain actually launched a naval raid to st. Petersburg. You can guess why the west would hate communism.
The discovery of the Higgs boson led to limitless power, the elimination of poverty and Kit-Kats for everyone. It is a communist chocolate hellhole and I'm here to stop it from ever happening. -Eloi Cole
There is Fail, and then there is Epic Fail. Fail can happen to anyone, no matter how hard you try. An Epic Fail however, requires a mistake so huge that the only reason the opposition can fathom as to why you did it is to think it was deliberate. - Aeros on erepublik
For Sweden I would have to say 16th century. Caused by the massacres of Finns during the Swedish-Russian wars and the actions of Ivan the Terrible. The moral indignation among the nobility as Erik XIV considered the possibility of handing over Katarina Jagellonica (wife of his brother Duke Johan) to Ivan the terrible could probably be seen as an institutionalized dislike of Russian culture.
This disregard for Russian culture can also be seen in the decision to not adequatly respond to the suggestions to make Karl Philip (Gustav II Adolfs younger brother) Tsar of Russia in the early 17th century.
The "loathing" of Russia was turned into fear/hatred after their victory in the great northern war but dissipated during the late 18th and early 19th century. Swedish families had significant economic interests in Russia from the 19th century up until the Russian revolution. The family of Alfred Nobel did for example work and live in St Petersburg and made much of their fortune from oil in Baku.
So loathing of Russia in Sweden would probably be considered common in 15XX to 1721.
Nikitn bypassing his suspensions again? or is it one of the others? *goes and checks which one is under suspension this month*
Perhaps the west began to dislike Russia when it began questionable policies on europe's horizon, then again when attempted the destruction of the Ottoman Empire, then again when the reds won the civil war and proclaimed a worldwide revolution as their ultimate goal. Then again before ww2 when making pacts with the other bad guys (nazis) to remove poland as a sovereign state along with the baltic countries, the invasion of finland, the mass murder in general that went on under soviet rule (throughout)..... during ww2 the refusal to allow democratic elections as previously promised to the other members of the allies - instead choosing to puppeteer them against all opposition, then the whole nuclear war threat thing that tended to crop up during the cold war..and now again because putin and his possy continue to use obselete violence in diplomacy.
Take your pick basically. Personally i find Russia's history one long horrible nightmare that tended to spill over into its neighbours, but alas (i am afterall one of those resident russophobes, apparently..)
Last edited by Carach; May 31, 2010 at 05:08 PM.
I think it goes back much further maybe 15th-16th century.
Muscovites being vile savages and all that.
The common culture of a tribe is a sign of its inner cohesion. But tribes are vanishing from the modern world, as are all forms of traditional society. Customs, practices, festivals, rituals and beliefs have acquired a flut and half-hearted quality which reflects our nomadic and rootless existence, predicated as we are on the global air-waves.
ROGER SCRUTON, Modern Culture
Sorry I see no Russian loathing but simple Great power politics. Its not like Russia did not also get along with the West ally to England against Nappy and in WW1, cut up Poland with Germany and Austria.Siberian Intervention? Great game with Britain, who started spreading anti-Russian propaganda around it's colonial Empire? Crimean War? Napoleon?
IN PATROCINIVM SVB Dromikaites
'One day when I fly with my hands - up down the sky, like a bird'
But if the cause be not good, the king himself hath a heavy reckoning to make, when all those legs and arms and heads, chopped off in battle, shall join together at the latter day and cry all 'We died at such a place; some swearing, some crying for surgeon, some upon their wives left poor behind them, some upon the debts they owe, some upon their children rawly left.
Hyperides of Athens: We know, replied he, that Antipater is good, but we (the Demos of Athens) have no need of a master at present, even a good one.
When Nikitn, Kirov et al started their "RUSSIA IS BEST" Hype on this forums? ;-)
Neutral to the teeth.
G.K. Chesterton'My country, right or wrong' is a thing no patriot would ever think of saying except in a desperate case. It is like saying 'My mother, drunk or sober.'
I think it became more common in Western & Central Europe after the Napoleonic Wars, when Russia became the undisputed military power of continental Europe. Russian expansion began to clash with mainly British but also French colonial interests.
Last edited by wilpuri; June 01, 2010 at 03:37 AM.
The common culture of a tribe is a sign of its inner cohesion. But tribes are vanishing from the modern world, as are all forms of traditional society. Customs, practices, festivals, rituals and beliefs have acquired a flut and half-hearted quality which reflects our nomadic and rootless existence, predicated as we are on the global air-waves.
ROGER SCRUTON, Modern Culture
or that time when they had half of Europe dressed in red for half a century. (last century)
No.
The common culture of a tribe is a sign of its inner cohesion. But tribes are vanishing from the modern world, as are all forms of traditional society. Customs, practices, festivals, rituals and beliefs have acquired a flut and half-hearted quality which reflects our nomadic and rootless existence, predicated as we are on the global air-waves.
ROGER SCRUTON, Modern Culture
The common culture of a tribe is a sign of its inner cohesion. But tribes are vanishing from the modern world, as are all forms of traditional society. Customs, practices, festivals, rituals and beliefs have acquired a flut and half-hearted quality which reflects our nomadic and rootless existence, predicated as we are on the global air-waves.
ROGER SCRUTON, Modern Culture
The common culture of a tribe is a sign of its inner cohesion. But tribes are vanishing from the modern world, as are all forms of traditional society. Customs, practices, festivals, rituals and beliefs have acquired a flut and half-hearted quality which reflects our nomadic and rootless existence, predicated as we are on the global air-waves.
ROGER SCRUTON, Modern Culture
Yes but neither Britain nor France nor indeed Britain and France equate to the West, and of course relations had improved by the time of the Triple Entente.
They are traditionally seen as Western European powers, and they began to loath Russia during the 19th century. Of course, once unified Germany came along, you had a common enemy, for a while.
Let's not try to obfuscate facts. The popular image of the Russian in Western Europe as a half-Asian tyrant emerged with great power politics (The Great Game) in the 19th century - not with the Russian revolution, which was largely lead by non-Russians.
The common culture of a tribe is a sign of its inner cohesion. But tribes are vanishing from the modern world, as are all forms of traditional society. Customs, practices, festivals, rituals and beliefs have acquired a flut and half-hearted quality which reflects our nomadic and rootless existence, predicated as we are on the global air-waves.
ROGER SCRUTON, Modern Culture
But again I'd argue you could illustrate such stereotyping of any nations. Britain and Russia had close ties by the time of World War I, with the royal families closely related and on good terms. You can point to moments when Britain and Russia were opposed, such as the Crimean, the Great Game, etc and when they were allied, such as the Napoleonic Wars and the Boxer Rebellion. You can't really argue for perpetual hate.
Last edited by removeduser_487563287433; June 01, 2010 at 05:58 AM.
Sigh.
Russia became a potential enemy of Western powers in the 19th century. There is an unbroken tradition of anti-Russian sentiment in Western Europe that developed during that time. Saying this anti-Russian sentiment started with the Bolsheviks is like saying that European anti-Americanism started with the 2003 invasion of Iraq, since there was increased, even if brief, solidarity after 9/11.
The Great Game and the 19th century is the century when Russia and Western powers became geopolitical rivals, and this rivalry has continued pretty much unbroken, with brief intervals when Western Powers and Russia have co-operated against (re-)emerging Germany.
If we want to trace the beginnings of Western Anti-Russian sentiment, which is geopolitical in nature, we must look to the 19th century. The Russian revolution and spread of communism caused anti-"russianism" was more internal and ideological in nature. But USSR presented the same geopolitical rivalry as Tsarist Russia had, and there is a clear continuum up to this day.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Great_Game
The common culture of a tribe is a sign of its inner cohesion. But tribes are vanishing from the modern world, as are all forms of traditional society. Customs, practices, festivals, rituals and beliefs have acquired a flut and half-hearted quality which reflects our nomadic and rootless existence, predicated as we are on the global air-waves.
ROGER SCRUTON, Modern Culture