Claims of the Artic Ocean:
In 2001, Russia took the first step, and the
Bear in the east claimed half the Arctic Ocean
including the North Pole, following other countries
protesting Russias attempted to build
under its claim by sending a research ship to the
north to collect location data,
and in August last year, arrived at the North Pole without
using icebreakers - the first ship that have ever done it.
Denmark and Russia, using geology as an argument to
claim the North Pole. In particular, Denmark, eager to
prove that a 1600 km long underwater mountain
range - Lomonosov chain - geologically associated with
Greenland. If so claim the Danish authorities that they can
claim the North Pole. There are many indications that
Norway in July this year will require ocean area north of
Svalbard, which is as large as half of Norway's land area,
but the site's requirements will not go all the way to the
North Pole. Russia and Greenland (Denmark) has a
special formation on the sea floor that Norway don't.
The Norwegian Oil Directorate has mapped our sea bed
for over 30 years, and has been commissioned by the
Norwegian Foreign Ministry to prepare the Norwegian
requirements in the north. Directorate also finance other
research in the area. Not everyone believes, however, that
melting of the North Pole gives cause for concern. No
one knows with certainty how much of Artic melting is
due to natural cycles and how much is caused by man-made
global warming. In particular, Russian scientists reject the
theory that we are witnessing a permanent climate change,
and they argue that the theory of global warming are wrong.
The energy-thirsty China has created a research center on
Svalbard, and many times it has sent the icebreaker "The
Snowdragon" to northern waters to conduct climate
research. Usually the "The Snowdragon" sail in Antarctica.
New Technology:
The interest in ships that can withstand collisions with
ice has been so great that the Norwegian Kvćrner
created a separate subsidiary company that develops
more robust ships. The new tankers have
bow at both ends, and if you encounter
ice, then you can turn the ship. The "back bow"
acts as the icebreaker.
If you look at a globe from above, then it's
easy to understands why new boundaries can
be important going forward.
Some countries, which have previously thought
they were half the world from each other, is really
close neighbors. When Tsarist Russia began to
move towards Central Asia in the 1800s was the
start of a power struggle with Britain on this
region, which the author Rudyard Kipling
called "The Great Game".
- The new race in the north is a major new
Game of the Arctic, says energy analyst
Christopher Weafer based in Moscow.
A proof of the kind of opportunities in the
north, the Russian Stockman, the world's largest
offshore gas fields. The Russians want to develop
field in the years ahead - which can cost
15-20 billion dollars - and the expected start-up
- In the coming years will find more gass fields
as Stockman, thinks Weafer.
Melting of the North Pole can do it
easier to pick up oil and gas in the north, but
it can also provide new challenges. Some
researchers have pointed out that a warmer climate will
cause more floating icebergs, not less, which will
preclude any recovery.
Several research reports have pointed out that
global warming will cause more fish spicies
to draw north.
- Global warming will in all probability
lead to increased in fishing in the Arctic, particularly
in the Barents Sea and the Bering Sea where such
commercial activity has been minimal
earlier, said in a report which was carried out
for the U.S. Navy in 2002.
The framework conditions for Norwegian High North-
policy has in the past 10-15 years undergone
large and fairly radical changes. New
players have come to, and new forces have
begun to assert themselves. While the Norwegian,
Russian and American High North policy
previously was a product of
security policy
deliberations - it is today, first and
primarily on
access to natural resources. It is
in this regard due to the
following question: Should we prepare
that military power assets may be
application in an increasingly acute struggle in
the Barents Sea precious and contentious
resources? Or can we assume outstanding
issues related to the Distinguishing,
management and allocation of resources will be
resolve through dialogue and negotiation?