Page 1 of 15 1234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 379

Thread: Rome's Strongest Enemy

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Lysimachus's Avatar Spirit Cleric
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    8,085

    Default Rome's Strongest Enemy

    With all of the Roman :wub: going on in the superpower thread, I felt like getting you guys thoughts on this. Who do you think was Rome's strongest adversary? The Celts? Germans? Dacians? In this thread i'm referring to once Rome had been established as an empire by the way, not its entire history. So uhm yeah, opinions? By the way it would be nice if you would back up your opinion rather than giving one word answers too.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Arsacids and Sassanids.


  3. #3
    hellheaven1987's Avatar Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Hell called Conscription
    Posts
    35,615

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Sassanid.
    Quote Originally Posted by Markas View Post
    Hellheaven, sometimes you remind me of King Canute trying to hold back the tide, except without the winning parable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diocle View Post
    Cameron is midway between Black Rage and .. European Union ..

  4. #4
    Poach's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    26,766

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Yep, the Parthian and Sassanid Empires were a powerful enemy that were capable of going up against the Empire.

    The Sassanids were, though, the superior of the mesapotamian Empires.

  5. #5
    Manuel I Komnenos's Avatar Rex Regum
    Civitate

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Athenian Empire
    Posts
    11,553

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Attila the Hun
    Under the patronage of Emperor Maximinus Thrax
    "Steps to be taken in case Russia should be forced out of war considered. Various movements [of ] troops to and from different fronts necessary to meeting possible contingencies discussed. Conference also weighed political, economic, and moral effect both upon Central and Allied powers under most unfavorable aspect from Allied point of view. General conclusions reached were necessity for adoption of purely defensive attitude on all secondary fronts and withdrawing surplus troops for duty on western front. By thus strengthening western front [those attending] believed Allies could hold until American forces arrive in numbers sufficient to gain ascendancy."
    ~General Pershing, report to Washington, 26 July 1917

  6. #6

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    I am going to say the Sassanids as well, but if your timespan extends that far, then it's definitely the Arabs. To me the real transition from Rome to Byzantium happens after and due to the crippling losses to the early Islamic armies, namely the fall of Syria, Palestine, Egypt and Northern Africa. Apart from the unparalleled in Roman history string of decisive defeats, in the aftermath of this war the demographic composition of the Empire had been altered and a heavy cultural shift had occured de facto, the status quo of the Rome as a superpower had been brought to ruins, as was the old doctrine of the Mediterranean being a Roman lake, the dominance of the Roman navy would be put to the test and a new system of military and political organisation would be introduced.
    No other enemy or coallition of enemies ever came close to inflicting so much damage and exerting so profound influence upon the character of the Empire itseelf.
    "Blessed is he who learns how to engage in inquiry, with no impulse to hurt his countrymen or to pursue wrongful actions, but perceives the order of the immortal and ageless nature, how it is structured."
    Euripides

    "This is the disease of curiosity. It is this which drives to try and discover the secrets of nature, those secrets which are beyond our understanding, which avails us nothing and which man should not wish to learn."
    Augustine

  7. #7

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    I would have to agree with almost everyone as well: the Parthians and the Sassanids would be my choice.

    I would also like to add the Huns as a contender.

  8. #8
    Flavius Nevitta's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    1,747

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Sassanides imho
    RESTITVTOR LIBERTATIS ET ROMANAE RELIGIONIS

    MINERVAE ET SOLIS INVICTI DISCIPVLVS

    formerly known as L.C.Cinna

  9. #9

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    The war-like and powerful confederation of Germanic tribes that lived north and north-east of the Danube as well far above the Rhine were another major military threat to the Romans. Indeed, the Visigoths sacked Rome in 410AD, the Vandals sacked it in 455AD and the Lombards in 568AD - they were all Germanic tribes or nations. They also annihilated Varus' legions. Not bad for a people without the empire, civilization and resources of the Persian Sassanids and Parthians.
    Death be not proud, though some have called thee
    Mighty and dreadful, for, thou art not so.

  10. #10
    Manuel I Komnenos's Avatar Rex Regum
    Civitate

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Athenian Empire
    Posts
    11,553

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    The Sassanid Empire never really threatened the very existence of the Roman Empire, not even of the Eastern Roman Empire (well, only at the time of Heraclius when Constantinople was besieged but that was later).. Besides the golden age of the Sassanid Empire was when the Roman Empire had been already divided into West and East Roman Empire.. The Huns are responsible for the dislocation of the German tribes which forced them to move towards the Roman territory and after a few years the Western Empire fell.. Also the Huns and their allies threatened the Eastern half of the Empire..
    Under the patronage of Emperor Maximinus Thrax
    "Steps to be taken in case Russia should be forced out of war considered. Various movements [of ] troops to and from different fronts necessary to meeting possible contingencies discussed. Conference also weighed political, economic, and moral effect both upon Central and Allied powers under most unfavorable aspect from Allied point of view. General conclusions reached were necessity for adoption of purely defensive attitude on all secondary fronts and withdrawing surplus troops for duty on western front. By thus strengthening western front [those attending] believed Allies could hold until American forces arrive in numbers sufficient to gain ascendancy."
    ~General Pershing, report to Washington, 26 July 1917

  11. #11
    cenkiss's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Turkiye
    Posts
    2,487

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Huns threatened the existence of roman empire.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    It's relitively hard to determine the strongest enemy of the Roman Empire, mainly because of it's fall into two seperate factions. For the Eastern Roman Empire(I guess Byzantine is fitting, though infact, the Eastern Roman Empire never used such a name. It was created over a centure after the fall of Constantinople), it's definetly either Sassasinid Empire or arguably Turks/Ottomans(Arabs?), call them whatever you like. Although it has to be said that the cold relations with the west contributed to the downfall of the Eastern Empire. One could argue that even though it were the Ottomans that ultimate conquered Constantinople, it was infact the western Europe that was the true enemy.

    As for the Western Roman Empire, it's harder to determine the strongest enemy(unless you can call economic system an enemy). One could say it were the Ostrogoths, Visigoths and Vandals. But then again, Huns also ravaged through the central Europe. Nonetheless, I'd still say that Vandals played the biggest part in the Western Empire's downfall(along with the rebellions, corruption, economic system and whatnot).

  13. #13

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Romans.

  14. #14

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by CiviC View Post
    Romans.
    Or rather the roman senate is what you meant by this.
    Parcus es vinco of fecal res
    "The scientists of today think deeply instead of clearly. One must be sane to think clearly, but one can think deeply and be quite insane." Tesla
    "France has more need of me than I have need of France." Napoleon
    "Its better to fight for something then live for nothing." Patton

  15. #15

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by {II}Sovereign View Post
    Or rather the roman senate is what you meant by this.
    The Senate, that impotent institution ... ?

    No, if we are to choose one institution, that is the Roman Army who was the greatest enemy of Rome.

  16. #16
    Lysimachus's Avatar Spirit Cleric
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    8,085

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by CiviC View Post
    The Senate, that impotent institution ... ?

    No, if we are to choose one institution, that is the Roman Army who was the greatest enemy of Rome.
    Do I really have to add "(excluding herself)" in to the thread title?

  17. #17

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Quote Originally Posted by Lysimachus View Post
    Do I really have to add "(excluding herself)" in to the thread title?
    Yes

    The Empire's worst enemy were his own legions.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    I'd go for the Arascids(Parthians),the Sassanids,and the Huns.This thread is quite interesting since I just Purchased Peter Heather's The Fall Of the Roman Empire.A new History of Rome and the Barbarians. I'm only half way through the book now,but so far he asserts that the Romans were far more scared of the Parthians,and later the Sassanids than even the Germanic threat.Also the Huns, because the Goths for example came swarming into the Empire which actually caused the battle of Adrianople,because they were seeking refuge from them.I knew that already,but I kind of figured the Germans were always a far more serious a threat than they really were. The Romans only had serious problems with them when they actually united in mass and weren't waging wars amongst themselves as was almost always the case.Expending vast amounts of troops, resources in the east,plague,made it difficult to counter threats on their northern borders.When Alaric came to siege Rome,the Romans pretty much forced his hand because of their betrayals,and widespread atrocities against the Goths in the empire,which drew many angry Goths formerly in Roman service into Alarics ranks
    There is only one good,knowledge,and one evil,ignorance.-Socrates

    "They tell lots of lies about me. They say I killed six or seven men for snoring. Well, it ain't true, I only killed one man for snoring."
    John Wesley Hardin



  19. #19
    Babur's Avatar ز آفتاب درخشان ستاره می
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Agra,Hindustan
    Posts
    15,405

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Sassanids:

    Under the patronage of Gertrudius!

  20. #20
    KngGilgamesh's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    VA, USA
    Posts
    468

    Default Re: Rome's Strongest Enemy

    Carthage at the early stage, Hannibal basically paraded his army across Italy.
    Then the Sassanids, which probably could have defeated the Roman Empire

Page 1 of 15 1234567891011 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •