Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 254

Thread: The medieval province of Dacia

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default The medieval province of Dacia

    Few people know about the medieval province of Dacia
    let's see what is about

    http://www.jggj.dk/
    http://www.jggj.dk/CDSD.htm
    http://www.jggj.dk/HOPD.htm

    Historia ordinis predicatorum in Dacia
    ....
    Notes and comments:

    [1] Translation of the word Dacia is often problematic, not least in regard of Dominican history, as medieval texts use it for both the kingdom of Denmark and for the entire region of Scandinavia. In this last sense, Dacia became the official name for the Nordic provinces of both the Dominicans and the Franciscans, which besides Denmark included the kingdoms of Norway and Sweden, as well as the duchies of Schleswig, Finland and Estonia. If any of the orders had established convents on Iceland - or Greenland even - that would have been ‘Dacian’ too. Until now, all transcripts have in their titles changed Dacia to some form of Dania, a post-medieval term for Denmark alone, but in my oppinion, this is wrong, as the chronicle clearly includes Sweden and Estonia too - and to some degree even Norway - and with the list of the first priors provincials, it is evidently concerned with the entire province of Dacia.
    ......................................................................................

    on the other hand we have a medieval chronicle:

    Dudonis de St.Quentin
    De moribus et actis primorum Normannorum ducum
    Historia Normannorum
    1015-1030

    in english ( translation from latin)
    http://www.the-orb.net/orb_done/dudo/dudindex.html

    we find out:
    chapter 2
    There the Hister is called the Danube, a river rising from the apex of mount Adnoa, increasing profusely in a large number of streams and passing, tempestuous, from south to east and separating Germania from Scythia until it is taken back into the Black Sea.
    Thus, spread over the plentiful space from the Danube to the neighborhood of the scythian Black Sea, do there inhabit fierce and barbarous nations, which are said to have burst forth in manifold variety like a swarm of bees from a honeycomb or a sword from a sheath, as is the barbarian custom, from the island of Scania, surrounded in different directions by the ocean. For indeed there is there a tract for the very many people of Alania, and the extremely well-supplied region of Dacia, and the very extensive passage of Greece. Dacia is the middle-most of these. Protected by very high alps in the manner of a crown and after the fashion of a city. With Mars' forewarning, raging warlike peoples inhabit those tortuous bends of extensive size, namely the Getae, also known as Goths, Sarmatians and Amacsobii, Tragoditae and Alans, and also very many nations who live by cultivating in the Baltic marshes. (note 2)
    For these nations, greatly inflamed by lascivious unchastity, and ravishing very many women with singular baseness, by performing in this way, men beget from them countless filthy offspring through mingling in a union of unlawful sexual union. These offspring, who would have been superfluous had they continued after they had come to maturity by holdings of goods to dwell in the inadequate land which they inhabited, savagely fighting against their fathers and their grandfathers or more often amongst themselves, are driven out by lot - the multitude of those reaching puberty having been brought together - according to long-standing usage (note 3) , into the realms of foreign nations to obtain for themselves in battle realms whereby they might be able to live in never-ending peace, as did, for instance, the Getae, Goths who pillaged almost all of Europe up to where they now reside.

    (note 2). Preferring the "in meotidibus" of Rouen 1173 and others; the "Meotic Marshes" are frequently the Sea of Azov but can also refer to the Baltic.

    and the original latin text:
    http://la.wikisource.org/wiki/De_mor...mannorum_ducum

    Observations:
    1. from the english translation we recognize in the description of the Dacia along with the Danube, Black Sea and the Carpatian mountains the homeland of normans ( danish, norvegian, swedish = viking peoples)
    2. in the original latin text we find out the following names for the scandinavians:
    Dacia, Datia for the country
    for the people:
    gentilitatis dacigena
    dacisce gentis populus ....
    dacos, dacorum, dacosque
    VVillelmus dux dacorum
    Alstignus dux dacorum
    Free Székely Land! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sz%C3%A9kely_Land
    Autonomy for Transylvania!

  2. #2
    Tiberios's Avatar Le Paysan Soleil
    Patrician Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Cimbria
    Posts
    12,702

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    ohh god, not this Dacian bs again

  3. #3

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Quote Originally Posted by Kralle18 View Post
    ohh god, not this Dacian bs again
    igen og igen
    Free Székely Land! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sz%C3%A9kely_Land
    Autonomy for Transylvania!

  4. #4
    konny's Avatar Artifex
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Germania Inferior
    Posts
    3,631

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    This is not meant as a direct reply to the OP, but rather as a general remark:

    Basing anything on single terms found in Medieval Latin documents leads nowhere: These texts were written by people in a language that was not their own. They had no access to dictonaries, grammar books or the like, but learned this language by oral teaching. Their teachers too had learned it by heart and oral teaching. That way they used the terms their teachers used and which they remembered being taught.

    To make matters even worse, many of the aspects they were writing about in Latin were unknown to the Romans, and therefore no proper Latin terms existed at all. This would apply, for example, to details of Medieval feudalism, but also geography and political divisions of eastern and northern Europe.

    Therefore one should not be surprised finding either different terms for the same thing, or the same term being used for different things.

    Team member of: Das Heilige Römische Reich, Europa Barbarorum, Europa Barbarorum II, East of Rome
    Modding help by Konny: Excel Traitgenerator, Setting Heirs to your preference
    dHRR 0.8 beta released! get it here
    New: Native America! A mini-mod for Kingdoms America

  5. #5
    Eat Meat Whale Meat
    Technical Staff Citizen Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15,812

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Damn it, the censor isn't working.

  6. #6

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Ok. I think now is the right time to ask..

    What`s up with the whole dacian/romanian nationalism? Of late i have seen many, many, many threads and statements about it.. So could someone tell me why dacia/romania is suddenly that interesting?




  7. #7

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    my post is nothing to do with the vlachs/romanians
    it is about the dacians~ goths~ geats and some historical sources that link the baltic peoples( scandinavians, lithuanians, polish, prussians) origins with this east european ancient population
    Free Székely Land! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sz%C3%A9kely_Land
    Autonomy for Transylvania!

  8. #8

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Quote Originally Posted by piroska View Post
    my post is nothing to do with the vlachs/romanians
    it is about the dacians~ goths~ geats and some historical sources that link the baltic peoples( scandinavians, lithuanians, polish, prussians) origins with this east european ancient population
    I thought that was nothing more than nationalistic bollocks debunked by most real historians.
    Hammer & Sickle - Karacharovo

    And I drank it strait down.

  9. #9
    NikeBG's Avatar Sampsis
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Sofia, Bulgaria
    Posts
    3,193

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Quote Originally Posted by Hookah Smoking Caterpiller View Post
    I thought that was nothing more than nationalistic bollocks debunked by most real historians.
    Depends. I don't know about the idea of continuous connection between Dacia and Dania (Denmark), but the idea of a connection between Getae and Goths (or Getae and Geats) is sometimes used by "nationalistic bollocks" (mainly by Balkan autochtonists) "debunked by most real historians".

    Btw, piroska, does your nickname happen to have a relation with a certain sweet food type?

  10. #10
    Odovacar's Avatar I am with Europe!
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Arrabona (Győr, Hungary)
    Posts
    6,120

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Quote Originally Posted by NikeBG View Post
    Btw, piroska, does your nickname happen to have a relation with a certain sweet food type?
    Judging from the avatar, it may be the hungarian female name "Piroska" (Little red)
    IN PATROCINIVM SVB HORSEARCHER
    quis enim dubitat quin multis iam saeculis, ex quo vires illius ad Romanorum nomen accesserint, Italia quidem sit gentium domina gloriae vetustate sed Pannonia virtute

    Sorry Armenia, for the rascals who lead us.


  11. #11

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Quote Originally Posted by NikeBG View Post
    Btw, piroska, does your nickname happen to have a relation with a certain sweet food type?
    Or Piroska of Hungary

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

  12. #12
    Manco's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Curtrycke
    Posts
    15,076

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Quote Originally Posted by piroska View Post
    my post is nothing to do with the vlachs/romanians
    it is about the dacians~ goths~ geats and some historical sources that link the baltic peoples( scandinavians, lithuanians, polish, prussians) origins with this east european ancient population
    There isn't a link, people just liked to claim mythological origins. Just like both the Romans and the Franks claimed to descend from Trojans, and some modern Evangelical Christians like to trace everything back to some long lost thirteenth tribe or some vaguely mentioned person in the Bible.

    Combine it with what Konny said about Latin terms, and you can easily see how Dudo de St.-Quentin (or was it Guillaime de Jumičge?) got it wrong in his Historia Normannorum.

  13. #13
    Eat Meat Whale Meat
    Technical Staff Citizen Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15,812

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Quote Originally Posted by Manco View Post
    There isn't a link, people just liked to claim mythological origins. Just like both the Romans and the Franks claimed to descend from Trojans, and some modern Evangelical Christians like to trace everything back to some long lost thirteenth tribe or some vaguely mentioned person in the Bible.
    And did those feet in ancient times walk upon England's mountains green?
    No.
    And was the holy lamb of God on England's pleasant pastures seen?
    No.
    And did the countenance divine shine forth upon those clouded hills?
    No.
    And was Jerusalem builded here among those dark satanic mills?
    No.

  14. #14

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Quote Originally Posted by Lordinquisitor View Post
    What`s up with the whole dacian/romanian nationalism? Of late i have seen many, many, many threads and statements about it.. So could someone tell me why dacia/romania is suddenly that interesting?
    And yes, the Getae/Gothic link is trash, as is that between Dacians/Danes. At most we can speak of Getic/Carpic influences on the Chernyakhov Culture of the Goths. To say that this makes them the same people however, is laughable.
    Last edited by pannonian; May 17, 2010 at 11:37 AM. Reason: Removal of unnecessary bits

  15. #15
    Manco's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Curtrycke
    Posts
    15,076

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    But the Getae-Goth is something different. The Goths did arrive in once Getic lands, and probably assimilated a lot of locals. Of course most Romanians or whoever who pander this theory seem to conclude that the Goths and Getae were somehow exactly the same, or that the Getae were the most important ones in the Gothic migrations. Which is rather easily debunked by them speaking a Germanic language and having Germanic names (and by the Getae being pretty much a historic artefact by then)

  16. #16

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Quote Originally Posted by Manco View Post
    But the Getae-Goth is something different. The Goths did arrive in once Getic lands, and probably assimilated a lot of locals. Of course most Romanians or whoever who pander this theory seem to conclude that the Goths and Getae were somehow exactly the same, or that the Getae were the most important ones in the Gothic migrations. Which is rather easily debunked by them speaking a Germanic language and having Germanic names (and by the Getae being pretty much a historic artefact by then)
    No mainstream historian in Romania, and no official history learned in schools in Romania claims such non senses as Gets being Goths or vice versa. Romanians respect and admire Danes, but we don't think we are related in any way then as all being descended from Adam and Eve (metaphorically speaking).

  17. #17

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    JORDANE'S
    THE ORIGIN AND DEEDS OF THE GOTHS

    http://www.northvegr.org/lore/jgoth/index.php

    http://www.northvegr.org/lore/jgoth/006.php
    ...
    Then when Buruista was king of the Goths, Dicineus came to Gothia at the time when Sulla ruled the Romans.
    ...
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getica



    Do you see, my friends, with your eyes, what we are: truly, we are dust and ash.

    Do you see, my friends, with your eyes, that Jordane's states that the goths are the geats?
    Buruista/Burebista the king of the dacians in his opinion was a gothish/geatish king?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_Denmark
    The monarchs of Denmark have a long history of royal and noble titles. Historically Danish monarchs also used the titles 'King of the Wends' and 'King of the Goths'.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_Sweden
    A simplified title that was sometimes used in less formal circumstances was Rex Sveciae or Sveriges Konung, the king of Sweden. The traditional full title of the Swedish sovereign was: By the Grace of God, King of Sweden, the Goths/Geats and the Wends (Swedish: med Guds Nĺde Sveriges, Götes och Vendes Konung; Latin: Dei Gratia Suecorum, Gothorum et Vandalorum Rex, sometimes the first part of the Latin title was Svionum or Sveonum, all meaning the Swedes, not Sweden)

    do you see, my friends who we are?
    Free Székely Land! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sz%C3%A9kely_Land
    Autonomy for Transylvania!

  18. #18
    Tiberios's Avatar Le Paysan Soleil
    Patrician Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Cimbria
    Posts
    12,702

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Quote Originally Posted by piroska View Post
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_Denmark
    The monarchs of Denmark have a long history of royal and noble titles. Historically Danish monarchs also used the titles 'King of the Wends' and 'King of the Goths'.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_Sweden
    A simplified title that was sometimes used in less formal circumstances was Rex Sveciae or Sveriges Konung, the king of Sweden. The traditional full title of the Swedish sovereign was: By the Grace of God, King of Sweden, the Goths/Geats and the Wends (Swedish: med Guds Nĺde Sveriges, Götes och Vendes Konung; Latin: Dei Gratia Suecorum, Gothorum et Vandalorum Rex, sometimes the first part of the Latin title was Svionum or Sveonum, all meaning the Swedes, not Sweden)

    do you see, my friends who we are?
    A link in these articles also states what is meant

    The title of King of the Wends denoted sovereignty or claims over once-Slavic lands of southern coasts of the Baltic Sea, those otherwise called Mecklenburg, Holstein and Pomerania, and was used from 12th century to 1972 by Kings of Denmark and from ca 1540 to 1973 by the Kings of Sweden.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_the_Wends

    and

    The title of King of the Goths (Swedish: Götes konung, Danish: Gothernes konge / De Gothers Konge, Latin: gothorum rex) was for many centuries borne by both the Kings of Sweden and the Kings of Denmark, denoting sovereignty or claimed sovereignty over the antique people of the Goths.
    To kings of Denmark, it chiefly meant the island of Gotland, traditionally regarded as the original home of the Goths, and to kings of Sweden, it meant the other of the two constituent parts of that kingdom (see Lands of Sweden), the Gothenland, southern "half" of Sweden.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_the_Goths

    both of which has nothing to do with anything in Dacia.

  19. #19

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Quote Originally Posted by Kralle18 View Post
    A link in these articles also states what is meant
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_the_Wends
    and
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_of_the_Goths

    both of which has nothing to do with anything in Dacia.
    The title of King of the Goths (Swedish: Götes konung, Danish: Gothernes konge / De Gothers Konge, Latin: gothorum rex) was for many centuries borne by both the Kings of Sweden and the Kings of Denmark, denoting sovereignty or claimed sovereignty over the antique people of the Goths.


    and the Goths lived in Dacia
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernyakhov_culture
    ..
    and a vocabulary comparison :
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germani...ary_comparison
    ..
    but Dacia was inhabited by germanic peoples from 200 BC
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bastarnae

    So it is a link betwen Dacia and the gemanic world. Least, if nothing else, was a linguistic-cultural conection
    I can't imagine the vikings just wake up and go to conquer the world. They also must have a history
    Free Székely Land! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sz%C3%A9kely_Land
    Autonomy for Transylvania!

  20. #20
    Manco's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Curtrycke
    Posts
    15,076

    Default Re: The medieval province of Dacia

    Quote Originally Posted by CiviC View Post
    No mainstream historian in Romania, and no official history learned in schools in Romania claims such non senses as Gets being Goths or vice versa. Romanians respect and admire Danes, but we don't think we are related in any way then as all being descended from Adam and Eve (metaphorically speaking).
    Oh yeah, that's some careless wording of mine there. I didn't mean to say that most Romanians believe Goths and Getae are the same.

    Quote Originally Posted by piroska
    Do you see, my friends, with your eyes, that Jordane's states that the goths are the geats?
    Buruista/Burebista the king of the dacians in his opinion was a gothish/geatish king?
    Jordanes's account contradicts everything else we know about the Goths, or dou also believe the Goths were involved in the Trojan war?

Page 1 of 6 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •