Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 21

Thread: Study shows world at it's most peaceful point in 12 years

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Protector Domesticus
    Citizen

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    4,045

    Default Study shows world at it's most peaceful point in 12 years

    New York — Despite the daily horrors in Iraq and seemingly regular spasms of terrorist-sponsored violence, the world is a much more peaceful place than it was a little more than a decade ago, a new study says.

    Since the end of the Cold War, the number of armed conflicts has declined by more than 40 per cent, while the number of the deadliest conflicts -- those involving more than 1,000 battle-related deaths -- has dropped by 80 per cent, said the Human Security Report, which was released here yesterday.

    "Over the past dozen years, the global security climate has changed in dramatic, positive and largely unheralded ways," the report states.

    "Civil wars, genocides and international crises have all declined sharply. International wars, now only a small minority of all conflicts, have been in steady decline for a much longer period, as have military coups and the average number of people killed per conflict per year."

    The one dark spot, not surprisingly, is international terrorism, which has been on the rise since the attacks on New York and Washington in 2001, though the death toll from such attacks is only a tiny fraction of war casualties.

    The report was produced by the University of British Columbia's Liu Institute on Global Affairs, and was funded by several Western governments, including Canada.

    It represents the first comprehensive effort to track the number of wars, both interstate and civil, raging around the globe, as well as the human toll from armed conflicts, terrorism and genocide.

    Andrew Mack, a UBC professor who led the study, said yesterday it is time to put to rest some common myths, including the overarching view that the world is spiralling downward into violence.

    "As is often the case with criminal violence, there is a huge disjuncture between what people believe is the case and what is actually the case," Prof. Mack said.

    "What is actually the case is that we've seen this extraordinary improvement across the board in nearly all forms of political violence, except international terrorism, which doesn't kill a lot of people. And yet most people believe things are getting worse."

    The report lays out what it calls "myths and misunderstandings," including: The number of genocides is increasing; wars are becoming more deadly and claimed the lives of five million people in the 1990s, and 90 per cent of those killed in today's wars are civilians, mainly women and children.

    "None of these claims are based on reliable data. All are suspect; some are demonstrably false," the report said.

    The report's authors calculated that civil and external wars killed about 700,000 combatants and civilians in 1950 but that figure dropped to about 100,000 in 1992 and 20,000 in 2002.

    Prof. Mack acknowledged that his data end in 2003, but insisted the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan that have been raging for the past two years have not dramatically increased the death toll or reversed the long-term trend.

    In 2004, there were just 25 armed secessionist conflicts under way in the world, the lowest number since 1976.

    In addition to the Middle East, Africa remained mired in armed conflict. At the turn of the 21st century, more people were killed in wars in sub-Saharan Africa than in the rest of the world combined.

    Prof. Mack, a former adviser to United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan, cited a number of reasons for the decline in armed conflicts around the world: the end of the post-colonial era and wars of independence; the end of the Cold War and ideologically driven engagements by superpowers and their proxies; the expansion of democratic government through much of the developing world; and the success of UN peacemaking and conflict resolution.

    "There is absolutely no doubt that the UN has been a critical actor, albeit an imperfect one, in bringing the numbers down," he said.

    Despite its failures in places such as Bosnia and Rwanda, the UN has frequently succeeded in preventing armed conflict or in maintaining peace once a conflict has ended.

    Prof. Mack insisted the report is not offering a rose-coloured view of the world.

    He noted there are about 60 wars being fought and a continuing threat of international terrorism, perhaps even of a terrorist group gaining access to weapons of mass destruction.

    "We're not Pollyannaish on this. We don't necessarily think there is going to be an upsurge in new violence but we think it is quite possible," he said.

    "But we also think that if the international community gets its act together, it could actually make a real reduction in the risk."

    War waning across the planet

    Wars between countries are more rare than in previous eras. The number of armed conflicts has declined by more that 40% since 1992. The deadliest conflicts, those with 1,000 or more battle deaths dropped by 80 per cent, and the number of international crises, often harbingers of war, fell by more than 70 per cent between 1981 and 2001.

    Countries at war most between 1946 and 2003

    Countries involved in the highest number of international armed conflicts

    U.K. 21

    France 19

    U.S. 16

    Russia 9

    Australia 7

    Holland 7

    Israel 6

    Egypt 6

    China 6

    Thailand 6

    N. Vietnam 5

    Turkey 5

    Jordan 5

    Portugal 5

    Canada 5

    Chad 4

    Libya 4

    Spain 4

    Syria 4

    Italy 4

    Iran 4

    Ethiopia 4

    Iraq 4

    N. Zealand 4

    S. Vietnam 4
    Link

    Interesting to say the least.

  2. #2

    Default

    Wont help the polititions with their 'unprecedented threat to our lives' line. Better get in some crap arsed legislation against terrorists then to gain the popular (and :wub:) vote
    ...but I think Germany with home advantage will raise their game as always for the big ones and win the title. Post #260

  3. #3

    Default

    Yes, interesting, but we would need more precision on how they calculated it, and what being "involved in a international armed conflict" means. Because, for example, I don't think Canada have been involved in any armed conflict for other purpose than peacekeeping. Because being involved in an armed conflict is not necessarily a bad thing, the way you do it and the reasons you do it is what makes the difference.

    They should make a list with the number of illegal participations to war. (Illegal as of the international treaties signed)

  4. #4
    Erik's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    15,653

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenris
    They should make a list with the number of illegal participations to war. (Illegal as of the international treaties signed)
    I disagree because then it would become a subjective political study.
    They tried to objectively measure how many wars there are, not give a judgement about those wars.

    It is indeed interesting but I think they should weight in how bad the current wars are.
    I think Darfur and Congo are very bad wars, but they only counts as one.
    Maybe in the past there were more "small" wars (just big enough to count) and now we have less but bigger ones?



  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Erik
    I disagree because then it would become a subjective political study.
    They tried to objectively measure how many wars there are, not give a judgement about those wars.

    It is indeed interesting but I think they should weight in how bad the current wars are.
    I think Darfur and Congo are very bad wars, but they only counts as one.
    Maybe in the past there were more "small" wars (just big enough to count) and now we have less but bigger ones?
    No, not subjective at all. Every country agreed with international terms and signed international treaties when they joined the UN. They HAVE to respect what they have signed and agreed on. There are international laws (but nothing to enforce them). Not following these laws for a country is just like a criminal not following a country's law.

  6. #6
    imb39's Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Patrician Citizen Administrator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    20,872

    Default

    Go Britain!!!

    I would love to know in what ways Britain has been involved in 21 conflicts since WW2. I would never had put us at the top. Having said that it invovled the break up of the Empire (country specific terrorism would be there (Kenya and Isreal spring to mind immediately)) Then you'd have Northern Ireland and the IRA. Flaklands War. Korean War. Suez. Iraq 1. Iraq 2. Well that's 8... Oh we also had the problems in Malasia and Burma. I'm running out of ideas now...

    Does peace keeping come into the picture?

    And I thought that the commies were bad...

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imb39
    Go Britain!!!

    I would love to know in what ways Britain has been involved in 21 conflicts since WW2. I would never had put us at the top. Having said that it invovled the break up of the Empire (country specific terrorism would be there (Kenya and Isreal spring to mind immediately)) Then you'd have Northern Ireland and the IRA. Flaklands War. Korean War. Suez. Iraq 1. Iraq 2. Well that's 8... Oh we also had the problems in Malasia and Burma. I'm running out of ideas now...

    Does peace keeping come into the picture?

    And I thought that the commies were bad...
    Aye. It's interesting how people gripe and complain about how the US are warmongers when France has been in more wars since the 40s.

    Patron of Felixion, Ulyaoth, Reidy, Ran Taro and Darth Red
    Co-Founder of the House of Caesars


  8. #8
    Erik's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    15,653

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imb39
    Does peace keeping come into the picture?
    Yes, as long as it's an armed conflict.
    The article doesn't judge countries, it's just an indiciation on how often countries go to war, for good or for bad.

    Quote Originally Posted by Justinian
    Aye. It's interesting how people gripe and complain about how the US are warmongers when France has been in more wars since the 40s.
    Yes, and it's also interesting that Americans think the French are cowards, never want to go to war, and have to be rescued if they do.

    I think the ONLY war France wasn't in but the US was is the current Iraq war.
    And the French were prepared to go to that war too... until they were called "old Europe".
    Last edited by Seleukos; October 20, 2005 at 04:40 AM.



  9. #9
    Trey's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Land of the Evergreens
    Posts
    3,886

    Default

    The reason the british and french are so high up is because of fighting with former colonies. also erik, you are right. The french have a reputation for being wimpy, but they aren't. (they just lose alot lol) they are vicious, more so than anyother country i can think of, (think algiers).
    for-profit death machine.

  10. #10
    Big War Bird's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    South Carolina, USA
    Posts
    12,340

    Default

    This fits with the clash of civilzations iMO. Since the end of the Cold War the world politics has been busy reorganizing itself along cultural lines. Without the USSR and USA competing for influence in virtually every region and nation, the various cultures are starting to gel into civilizational blocks, ergo fewer conflicts. However as civilizations retrench, new fault lines are developing.
    As a teenager, I was taken to various houses and flats above takeaways in the north of England, to be beaten, tortured and raped over 100 times. I was called a “white slag” and “white ****” as they beat me.

    -Ella Hill

  11. #11
    Ummon's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19,146

    Default Decline In Armed Conflict Claimed

    Here: http://www.spacewar.com/news/milplex-05j.html

    The independent Human Security Report released at the United Nations says armed conflict declined by 40 percent since 1991, citing successes of U.N. conflict-resolution and peace-building policies.
    The report, which was released Monday, also found armed conflicts -- defined as 1,000 or more battle-deaths per year -- dropped by 80 percent since 1992, roughly about the time the Cold War ended.

    The 200-page report also found wars between countries are rarer and now constitute less than 5 percent of all armed conflicts; separately, the number of military coups declined by 60 percent since 1963.

    The definition of armed conflict is narrow as it does not include genocide, and so excludes the death tolls for such genocides as Rwanda and Srebrenica. The data also does not include the indirect deaths from weapons such as landmines that are left after a conflict.

    According to the report, the reason for the decline in armed conflict is three fold: The end of colonialism, which previously made up 60 percent of all international conflicts. The end of the Cold War, which had driven one-third of all conflicts following World War II; and an increase in international activities to stop ongoing wars by the use of U.N. diplomacy missions, peacekeeping operations and sanctions.

    The mistaken perception, the report argues, is that Africa has been the center of many conflicts, but since 1946 it calculated that Myanmar, the former Burma, experienced 232 wars with neighbors, followed by India with 156, Israel with 79, Britain with 77 and France with 66.
    Notice also the last paragraph. Britain and France before U.S. Devilish Empire? And very near the hated Israel too. :wink:

  12. #12
    Erik's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    15,653

    Default

    Plese close this thread and continue in:
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=35841



  13. #13
    Ummon's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19,146

    Default

    Of course (didn't notice the existence of the other thread), but why not merge and edit instead? The article is the same but the numbers differ...

  14. #14
    imb39's Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Patrician Citizen Administrator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    20,872

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ummon
    Notice also the last paragraph. Britain and France before U.S. Devilish Empire? And very near the hated Israel too. :wink:
    Stirring by any chance? If this includes peace keeping duties - which it does - then it also points out that some countries are acting more altruistically than others...

  15. #15
    Ummon's Avatar Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    19,146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imb39
    Stirring by any chance? If this includes peace keeping duties - which it does - then it also points out that some countries are acting more altruistically than others...
    Dunno, it would be really interesting to discover what exactly they are referring to.

  16. #16
    Seleukos's Avatar Hell hath no fury
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Vancouver, Washington, US
    Posts
    8,866

    Default

    Threads merged.

  17. #17
    Erik's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    15,653

    Default

    The U.S. National Counterterrorism Center released data in April showing terror attacks had increased from 175 attacks in 2003 to 651 in 2004; the total casualty toll was nearly 9,000.
    http://www.spacewar.com/news/milplex-05j.html

    Sounds like the "war on terror" is going well....



  18. #18
    JP226's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    16,973

    Default

    Sounds like the "war on terror" is going well....
    I never really thought of it that way. Who knew that going to war meant an increase in violence???

  19. #19
    Trey's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Land of the Evergreens
    Posts
    3,886

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JP226
    I never really thought of it that way. Who knew that going to war meant an increase in violence???
    haha
    for-profit death machine.

  20. #20

    Default

    I have a suspicion that again on these statistics large parts of the world are being ignored... Rwanda comes to mind, and the recent events involving this same country Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo make me doubt the validity of these claims. Even if the estimated 4 million dead are an exageration, i doubdt it ends up being 100.000....

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •