Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 23

Thread: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    A short Question

    What kind of "start" artillery unit would i use, the Sakers or the Demi-Cannon ?

    (sorry for my poor english, i´m of swedish origin)

  2. #2

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    Pretty sure you get 4 demi-cannons per unit (at least that's how I have my unit sizes set up) and 3 per unit of sakers, isn't it? Also, you can't use canister shot with sakers, which is a deal breaker for me.

  3. #3

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    Quote Originally Posted by Hurricane Brad View Post
    Pretty sure you get 4 demi-cannons per unit (at least that's how I have my unit sizes set up) and 3 per unit of sakers, isn't it? Also, you can't use canister shot with sakers, which is a deal breaker for me.
    thankz, mate

  4. #4

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    accourding to totalwar.honga both the Sakers and the Demi-Cannon has 4 guns/unit

  5. #5

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    Yes, the amount of guns is the same (depends on your unit size settings in graphics options: 1 for small, 2 for medium, 3 for large, 4 for ultra).
    Anyway, I for one don't use the early artillery at all until they become moveable; in fact, I scrap the units I start off with.
    Tools: PFM 4.1 - EditSF 1.2.0
    (Download PFM - Download EditSF)
    Warscape Modding Guide
    Join the PFM User Group on Steam to receive PackFileManager update notifications.

    Respecto Patronum

  6. #6

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    okey

  7. #7

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    my suggestion, get 12lbers ASAP

    on the other hand, these fixed cannon do have slightly better stats.
    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Quote Originally Posted by hammeredalways
    blimey Drewoid13 an (HB) for a couple of days and you already have our old world cynicism ... oh and as a (HB) you are exempt from the Proclamation

  8. #8
    Humble Warrior's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Great Britain.
    Posts
    11,147

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    AS soon as I discovered that Sakers didn`t have cannister shot, I ditched them (took a lost battle to find out too).

    Me: We have the enemy cavalry at optimum range! Fire Cannister!"

    Artillery men: "Er... we don`t do cannister."

    Me: What?

    Artillery men: "It`s not our scene, man."

    *Artillery wiped out by enemy cavalry.*
    Last edited by Humble Warrior; May 11, 2010 at 12:00 PM.

  9. #9
    Wegen7 die Große's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    In the country side of the once glorious British Isles.
    Posts
    2,301

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    Well if you want to get rid of infantry try sakers, and if you want to get rid of walls and buildings try Demi's.

  10. #10
    dutch81's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,242

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    Quote Originally Posted by Ways7 View Post
    Well if you want to get rid of infantry try sakers, and if you want to get rid of walls and buildings try Demi's.
    I doubt this ... if Sakers don't get cannister shot, I don't this myself I have never build this unit myself, then this makes them weak vs. infantry.

    The Demi's stick around in the game for a long time so I'd say they are OK if you don't mind the lack of mobility ... I keep them as they tend to be rather experienced by the time I get my 12#'s. Once I get the 12#'s the Demi's go to backwater theaters or garrisons that need a bit of extra umpf.

  11. #11
    Humble Warrior's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Great Britain.
    Posts
    11,147

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    Quote Originally Posted by Ways7 View Post
    Well if you want to get rid of infantry try sakers, and if you want to get rid of walls and buildings try Demi's.
    Are you saying that to be different? Because that makes no sense at all. Without cannister shot, sakers are almost useless against infantry as well as cavalry, especially once they get close. I`d say keep Sakers for walls and buildings and nothing else.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    Don't use either, just scrap them and wait until you can train 12 lb foot artillery, the money is better than fixed artillery IMO

  13. #13

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    Is the fixed artillery pieces usefull as a defensive ? Like useing it to defend a minor important buildings?

  14. #14

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    I put two units of fixed artillery in my early game armies. They're useless on attack, but work just fine on defense. They're made completely obsolete by the early foot pieces, but as long as I research canister right away, I get a good return on the investment.

    -HD

  15. #15

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    okey,so you´ll accepts my idea ?

  16. #16

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    Yes, sure, I don't disband them or anything, they're useful on defense, sometimes responsible for more kills than any single line infantry (with canister). But I use a couple of TopCat's mods to make artillery much more accurate, and canister more deadly. Vanilla, I probably wouldn't build anymore than I start with.

    -HD

  17. #17
    dutch81's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,242

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    Well ask yourself this do you ever use the defensive fortifications in a defensive battle, most people will say they do not because it restricts the swing of your guns ... it also takes away all mobility ... but if you use guns with the eartworks then they might as well be the demi-cannon. Now the saker I have never used and I don't know why anyone would ... most armies are given demi-cannons at first and sakers are the first gun to leave when you get your 12#'s I don't know why they are even in the game it would have been better to put in something that actually gets used, even pikeman have more use then sakers.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    Demi-cannons seem to be slightly better than Sakers.
    "Der Krieg ist eine bloße Fortsetzung der Politik mit anderen Mitteln.
    (War is merely the continuation of politics by other means.)


  19. #19

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    My preferred tactics in the early game tend to involve movement, mass, and melee. Artillery just slows down my armies and hinders my maneuvers, so I scrap all sakers and demi-cannons immediately. I haven't spent money on a 12-lber yet either.

    I've almost never had much of a problem with AI-controlled artillery for the first 15-20 years or so. I have come to scorn even their 12-lbers so much that I count two units of them as one line infantry or regular cavalry when weighing odds.

    Ottoman 18-lbers with canister, however, are worthy of respect. I actually need to think about how my forces advance to them - I can't just tell my cavalry to "advance across open country from half-way across the map, and don't bother me again until the enemy arty is dead and you want another target".

  20. #20
    Daneboy's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen
    Posts
    1,187

    Default Re: Sakers vs Demi-Cannon

    Quote Originally Posted by War&Politics View Post
    Demi-cannons seem to be slightly better than Sakers.
    Yep! Agree.

    Cannister rules!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •