I hate how you have to complete a mission to take YOUR OWN Colonies. As I am Britain I have to go to war with France, which means a 2 front war in the Americas and Europe. France also have dangerous allies, including Spain, who I wouldnt want to go to war with just yet. Also I have to effectively wipe out the Cherokees by taking Georgia and their own home region. Also the Kaintuck Region Capital would have to be invaded as it would pose a threat to my newly captured Cherokee Territory.
So really do I just neglect the 13 colonies and avoid a 2 front war with powerful nations until I have built up by Army + Navy, this could be costly though as the French could get a major foothold in North America or the United States could take many regions if they come into exsistance. Instead of focusing on North America, is it better to start with getting a foothold in India. I would rather fight the Mughals then the French to be honest as I am not strong enough at the start of the game. Should I just take on the Cherokees with a Army built up from the Jamaica, and just forget the French for the time being, till I am stronger.
Or do I wage war with France and hope Spain dont get involved? A 2 front war with France would be hard enough. If i didnt go to war with the French though would I try to go to war with the Huron and try to take their lands with a built up army from the Rupert's Land?




Reply With Quote










