Right well i watched "Michael Collins" the movie last night with some friends(i cant study 24 7 i guess) and we decided to watch something that, while not pertinent to me was helpful for them, as pseudo revision. It is based on the life of the man who was really responsible for the formation of the Free State, rather than Eamonn De Valera as our curriculum states(dont want another generation of IRA supporters growing up in the Republic i guess), and i was wondering if the movie itself was historically accurate. (Granted it makes a clear distinction between the Irish Volunteers and their fragmentation that resulted in the IRA and its various splinter groups)From what i can tell it is rather accurate with regards to the 1916 rising and the civil war between those who wanted a 32 county republic and the government who was ready to abandon the Catholic Minority in Ulster but can anyone spot some obvious flaws? It seems pretty solid imho but im not a modern historian and im really biased on this topic, both sides of my family fought in the civil War on the IRA side and my fathers side was active until the mid ninties, and id like to hear some informed opinions.
Overall its a great movie and there is a nice little bit of dark humour laced throughout... I would give you guys a linky but if you are so inclined its on nearly every site of that nature that i frequent...and im rather sure it would be against the TOS too
P.S. I havent forgot about my Alexandrian thread but its goint to take a little bit longer than the 5 minutes it took me to write this than my replies to Phoebus, Herakios et al
P.P.S If you like this check out the "Wind That Shakes the Barley" for an insight of the footsoldiers during the war =)




Reply With Quote













