View Poll Results: What would gun conrol do to the crime rate?

Voters
103. You may not vote on this poll
  • Stop it completely.

    5 4.85%
  • Lower it a lot

    33 32.04%
  • Lower it a little

    25 24.27%
  • Accomplish nothing

    23 22.33%
  • Increase crime rate a bit

    6 5.83%
  • Increase crime rate a lot

    11 10.68%
Page 1 of 14 1234567891011 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 338

Thread: Gun Control!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    First Crusader's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    1,475

    Default Gun Control!

    If gun control is implemented, what do you think will happen? Please explain why you voted for what you voted for.

    I think gun control is bad. Why? Because a law alone won't accomplish anything. All it will do is disarm the citizenry. The criminals will burry their guns in the backyard until the police sweeps are over and then start using them again. Guns can be smuggled, just like coke and liquor. We would have to stop all illegal immigration too, as Mexican smugglers would see a need for guns as a potential gold mine.

    There is an even bigger danger. Rome eventually lost democracy and became a dictatorship. This will happen here, too, unless the people still have a means to fight unjust government. And by a "means of fighting", I don't mean letters to your congressman!
    Heresy grows from idleness.

    No cause for such alarm. There are many ways for you to die - I'm just one of them.

  2. #2

    Default

    The saying goes: Outlaw guns and only outlaws will have guns.

    Patron of Felixion, Ulyaoth, Reidy, Ran Taro and Darth Red
    Co-Founder of the House of Caesars


  3. #3
    First Crusader's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    1,475

    Default

    Right on, Justinian!
    Heresy grows from idleness.

    No cause for such alarm. There are many ways for you to die - I'm just one of them.

  4. #4
    imb39's Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Patrician Citizen Administrator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    20,872

    Default

    Clearly this is, effectively an American issue - though Brazil is currently having a referendum about gun control.

    My views are fairly simple - if you want to cut down on the number of gun deaths, then you have to get rid of them. This fallacy about dictatorship - Britain has been a democracy a hell of a lot longer than America, but we don't find the need to keep guns - indeed after a couple of massacres (Dunblane, being the defining one), gun laws were tightened up so much that we may have the tightest laws regarding these weapons. It is just paranoia. When America has a tragedy (Columbine), the answer is... more guns. Crazy.

    Of course, a change from gun society to non gun society will be painful -but it is a measure of the lack of trust within your own great country that you even feel the need for those evil things. Crime will go up alot initially but will probably decline - it will end up being less violent over time.

    Can someone explain why anybody needs something more powerful than a handgun. Perhaps a rifle for hunting - but why on earth does anyone need an assault rifle? This is just so stupid...

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imb39
    Perhaps a rifle for hunting - but why on earth does anyone need an assault rifle? This is just so stupid...
    Firstly, most people who own assault rifles aren't criminals, probably because there are very, very strict laws regarding them. Secondly, assault rifles were only legalized a few years ago in the US unless I was sniffing crack back then. Third, a lot of people who own assault rifles are ex-military; fourth, maybe people just want to have assault rifles for the coolness factor of firing them, and are quite responsible with them.

    Besides, if a criminal breaks into your house and tries to rape your daughter defended by his piddly little handgun, and you can respond with an AK-47... well, that's a plus.

    Patron of Felixion, Ulyaoth, Reidy, Ran Taro and Darth Red
    Co-Founder of the House of Caesars


  6. #6
    imb39's Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Patrician Citizen Administrator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    20,872

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Justinian
    Firstly, most people who own assault rifles aren't criminals, probably because there are very, very strict laws regarding them. Secondly, assault rifles were only legalized a few years ago in the US unless I was sniffing crack back then. Third, a lot of people who own assault rifles are ex-military; fourth, maybe people just want to have assault rifles for the coolness factor of firing them, and are quite responsible with them.

    Besides, if a criminal breaks into your house and tries to rape your daughter defended by his piddly little handgun, and you can respond with an AK-47... well, that's a plus.
    Well, I never inferred that anyone who had an assault rifle was a criminal. I did say they were crazy! Actually, the laws legalising them crazy...

    tbh, a criminal will probably try and take you out before you got to use your uber mega powerful ultra magnificent phallic symbol.

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by imb39
    Can someone explain why anybody needs something more powerful than a handgun. Perhaps a rifle for hunting - but why on earth does anyone need an assault rifle? This is just so stupid...
    Handguns are used to commit the majority of crimes involving guns in the United States. A distant second are shotguns. Assault rifles make up roughly 1-2% of firearms used in crimes here. Now, when I say assault rifles, I'm talking about civilian rifles that are semi-automatic only. As for fully automatic guns (which are legal to own as long as you get an extensive background check and pay a tax to aquire a class III license) there is only one case in the United States where someone who legally owned one commited a crime with it, and he was a police officer.

    I own two Chinese made assault rifles, an SKS and a MAK90. I have never commited a crime with these rifles. I have used the MAK90 to scare off a prowler. Right there, it paid for itself, and I consider it one of the best investments I've ever made. You can't put a price on the saftey of your loved ones.

    I don't know what it's like in the UK, but the SCOTUS has ruled that it is not the job of the police to protect the citizenry, only to bring law breakers to trial. Police response is not fast enough when you have a determined attacker. By the time they arrive, you could very well be dead already and the killer long gone. If you ask me what I reach for first if I suspect someone is breaking into my house, don't expect me to say the phone.

    Britain once had pretty much no gun control. They began to introduce laws to keep guns out of the hands of the Irish originally, and slowly over many decades, they eventually took gun rights away from everyone. It is quite sad, considering the idea of right to self defense in the modern sense spawned in England. If you have some time on your hands, I suggest you read this essay here: http://www.davekopel.com/2A/LawRev/SlipperySlope.htm
    It details how England went from no gun control to the Draconian state of today.

    Quote Originally Posted by imb39
    But an assault rifle will do nothing other than kill someone, surely.
    Aside from the deterrant factor, that's what it's suppose to do. What practical purpose do handguns have? Hunting? I think not. They are designed to kill people.
    Last edited by Polemides; October 10, 2005 at 11:14 PM.

    In patronicum sub Tacticalwithdrawal
    United States Marine as of 3/31/2006

  8. #8
    TW Bigfoot
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    EARTH
    Posts
    6,040

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Polemides

    Britain once had pretty much no gun control. They began to introduce laws to keep guns out of the hands of the Irish originally, and slowly over many decades, they eventually took gun rights away from everyone. It is quite sad, considering the idea of right to self defense in the modern sense spawned in England. If you have some time on your hands, I suggest you read this essay here: http://www.davekopel.com/2A/LawRev/SlipperySlope.htm
    It details how England went from no gun control to the Draconian state of today.
    im sorry.

    i just find this VERY funny

    Draconian haha.
    i feel no need to own a gun.
    what the hell would we need guns for exactly?

    only an american would sugest that "gun control" was a restriction of freedom

    well technically it is
    by the same token, murder is a restiction of freedom...

    haha
    no, i like our gun laws just the way they are.
    Draconian haha

    this link you made
    is EVEN FUNNYER

    im really sorry.
    im not trying to bellite you or anyhting.
    i just find this BLOODY Funny :laughing:

    "the evil british goverment dont let there people have guns!"
    hehe.

    ahhh.
    cheers.
    Last edited by bigfootedfred; October 11, 2005 at 02:00 AM.

  9. #9
    Bwaho's Avatar Puppeteer
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    From the kingdom of heaven by the powah of the holy spirit
    Posts
    5,790

    Default

    The saying goes: Outlaw guns and only outlaws will have guns.
    Maybe so. What's interesting is the fact that countries with stricter gun laws have lower death rates with firearms, for example: Japan

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bwaho
    Maybe so. What's interesting is the fact that countries with stricter gun laws have lower death rates with firearms, for example: Japan
    And Australia. Whereas the US has a gun homicide rate up there with Third World war zones. Hmmmm ...

    But it's a 'right' apparently. And it makes them 'safer' apparently. Some 'safety' ...

  11. #11
    First Crusader's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    1,475

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bwaho
    Maybe so. What's interesting is the fact that countries with stricter gun laws have lower death rates with firearms, for example: Japan
    So you have ONE example of this. Try to name a country with gun control that doesn't have a radically different culture, like Britain. But gun control has done more harm than good over there, so you can't name that one.
    Heresy grows from idleness.

    No cause for such alarm. There are many ways for you to die - I'm just one of them.

  12. #12

    Default

    I think strict Gun control would not solve much in the first place, with more "bad" people having illegal guns. On top of that, I think it would cause the crime rate to increase further by opening up a major illegal gun trade business in the United States, causing criminal organizations to grow.

  13. #13
    Mylae's Avatar Memento Mori
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ferrara, Italy
    Posts
    970

    Default

    in Italy there's gun control: you can have it, but for hunting or similar, and police have to know that you have a gun, which type, etc; obviously criminals have illegal guns. But normal people says: "why I have to need a gun?". Guns are low diffused. And in fact, it's really rare that people die by shooting, when happens it's sometimes intra-family murdering with hunting guns or criminals that shoot theirselves. There's always a great scandal in medias if someone die by shooting...
    nevertheless, Italy is the best seller of weapons in the world.
    Extravagant developer of Invasio Barbarorum: Flagellum Dei; Developer of Paeninsula Italica
    Creator of the XV-Century Machiavello Total War Mod (2.0) for M2TW



    Honorabilis Gaius Baltar est mihi patronum.

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mylae
    in Italy there's gun control: you can have it, but for hunting or similar, and police have to know that you have a gun, which type, etc; obviously criminals have illegal guns. But normal people says: "why I have to need a gun?". Guns are low diffused. And in fact, it's really rare that people die by shooting, when happens it's sometimes intra-family murdering with hunting guns or criminals that shoot theirselves.
    And in here the police know where we LIVE... if we move to a new address then we have to tell them within 3 months.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mylae
    There's always a great scandal in medias if someone die by shooting...
    nevertheless, Italy is the best seller of weapons in the world.
    Here as well. If I storm a dairy shop with a shotgun (and murder the worker) it will be made a nationwide news (it did this year). Seriously. Possibly with national manhunt as well.

    We don't mind people having assault rifles (or military-style semi-automatic rifles and we need E endoresement but is possible to obtain special licence for them) as long as they've got a steel concrete room to secure these firearms against theft.

  15. #15

    Default

    Britain once had pretty much no gun control. They began to introduce laws to keep guns out of the hands of the Irish originally
    ...That worked out well.

    I myself am a Firearms enthusiast. I collect WW1 and WW2 Rifles, restore them, and enjoy shooting them. I'll have to sell them off before I go back to Belfast of course, but I love Rifles. I dont like modern assault rifles much, I like wood, iron, and the cold steel!

  16. #16
    Redfoxx's Avatar Miles
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Chandler Arizona
    Posts
    344

    Default guns

    im all for civilians owning guns, i myself have a nice collection of them. Not only do i feel safer with an mk23 right next to me when i go to bed, but have you ever fired an Ak47? that thing feels so powerful its great to shoot.
    "Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?"

  17. #17
    First Crusader's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    1,475

    Default

    Mainly, because they are heck of cool! But if you are a member of one of the "minuteman" militias forming on the southern border, a decent gun can really come in handy when fighting mexican smugglers invading your neighborhood*.

    *I have nothing against Mexicans. I just don't dislike Mexican illegals and criminals anymore than I dislike American criminals.

    Concerning gun control rates: could someone do me a favor and post some statistics on this? From what I have heard, the crime rate has continued unabated after gun control was implemented in Britain. This makes sense. The only thing keeping American muggers from having a mugging orgie is the fear of coming face to face with a sawed off shotgun. When the citizens lose their guns, this fear goes away, and the muggers can now mug in safety!
    Heresy grows from idleness.

    No cause for such alarm. There are many ways for you to die - I'm just one of them.

  18. #18
    MaximiIian's Avatar Comes Limitis
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Louisville, Kentucky
    Posts
    12,890

    Default

    FC, if you dislike mexican criminals more than white criminals, It sounds an awful lot like you have thing against mexicans.

    OT, I don't own a gun, so, meh.

  19. #19
    Mack Daddy's Avatar Tiro
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Buffalo, NewYork
    Posts
    219

    Default

    i got me an M1 Garand For self defense of course! You never know when there maybe a "Canadian Bacon" incident.

  20. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mack Daddy
    i got me an M1 Garand For self defense of course! You never know when there maybe a "Canadian Bacon" incident.
    and ur what 15
    The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be used until they try and take it away.
    Staff Officer of Corporal_Hicks in the Legion of Rahl
    Commanding Katrina, Crimson Scythe, drak10687 and Leonidas the Lion

Page 1 of 14 1234567891011 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •