Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Galatian Swordsman

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Amaranth's Avatar Ordinarius
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    748

    Default Galatian Swordsman

    Allright.. You might think that I'm crazy for trying to do this but here it goes:

    I want to replace the new Galatian Swordsman skin with the old one.
    I mean I want to change this (newer vers.): with this one (older vers.):


    I got both versions of the mod, so the files must in there somewhere. But where ? I searched and found some items with the names WARBAND_GALATIAN and such but before I attempt to change them I thought someone else here might know better, so which are the exact files I need to replace from the old version to new ?
    Next Heir Ancillary (NHA) Sub-Mod for Stainless Steel & Third Age Total War




  2. #2
    DimeBagHo's Avatar Praeses
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    7,943

    Default Re: Galatian Swordsman

    Quote Originally Posted by Amaranth View Post
    Allright.. You might think that I'm crazy...
    You're crazy.

    You need to take a look at two files: export_descr_units.txt and descr_model_battle.txt. Check in EDU for the entry for Galatian Swordsmen, and note the soldier type. Then find that soldier type in DMB. The entry for that soldier type in DMB will tell you which files are used. For most AOR units the skin (the .TGA.DDS file) is the one listed on the "merc" line.

    When you add everything to your own mod you may need to make a new entry in DMB just for Galatian Swordsmen. The current entry is shared between at least a couple of different unit types so unless you want to change the model for all of them, you will need to split them into two entries.

    Hope that helps.
    Last edited by DimeBagHo; April 10, 2010 at 08:38 PM.

  3. #3
    Amaranth's Avatar Ordinarius
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    748

    Default Re: Galatian Swordsman

    Quote Originally Posted by DimeBagHo View Post
    You're crazy.
    Haha thanks !

    Well, I'll give it a try and see if I can make it, if not then I'll just get to used to it I guess, thanks =)
    Next Heir Ancillary (NHA) Sub-Mod for Stainless Steel & Third Age Total War




  4. #4

    Default Re: Galatian Swordsman

    Well, now that's resolved, mind if I hijack your thread?

    While playing as Pontus recently, I saw this unit in Ancyra - however, when starting up a campaign with the Galatians, they only seem to have the usual Gallic units. Are the Galatian units available in the campaign at some later point, or are they only available as AoR units in Ancyra?

    By the way, Ancyra seems like an interesting start point for a provincial campaign, any chance of that?

    司徒華 - 默寫的謊言掩蓋不了血寫的歷史
    (Szeto Wah - Lies written in ink cannot cover history written in blood)

  5. #5
    DimeBagHo's Avatar Praeses
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    7,943

    Default Re: Galatian Swordsman

    IIRC Galatian Swordsmen are identical to Gallic Heavy Swordsmen, which the Gauls get as a post-marian unit (in both the Imperial and the Galatians campaigns).

    I think it's unlikely that another campaign starting in Ancyra will be added. If you play the start of the current Galatians campaign historically then you should wind up settiling around there anyway. If I add another Gallic campaign it will probably be Britania.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Galatian Swordsman

    So they are - my campaigns never seem to reach the Marian reforms, so I've never come across Gallic Heavy Swordsmen before. I have modded my install of XGM to grant Galatian Swordsmen to the Galatians, to add some early variety and punch, to compensate the lack of hording (Alex.exe). Still need to bug-check to make sure the changes don't have any other unintended consequences, but once that's done, I could upload the files if you're interested.

    Changes:
    -Added "hidden_resource galatia_pl" to all regions in the Galatian campaign.
    -Added "galatia_pl" to export_desc_buildings.txt
    -Modified the following lines in export_desc_buildings.txt
    barracks_three_barbarian
    CHANGED
    recruit "warband sword heavy gaul" 0 requires factions { gauls, slavs, } and marian_reforms
    TO
    recruit "warband sword heavy gaul" 0 requires factions { gauls, } and marian_reforms and not hidden_resource galatia_pl
    recruit "warband sword heavy gaul" 0 requires factions { slavs, } and marian_reforms
    ADDED
    ;Galatians
    recruit "warband galatian" 0 requires factions { gauls, } and hidden_resource galatia_pl
    recruit "warband galatian" 0 requires factions { slavs, } and hidden_resource galatia
    barracks_four_barbarian
    CHANGED
    recruit "warband sword heavy gaul" 0 requires factions { gauls, slavs, } and marian_reforms
    ;AoR
    recruit "warband galatian" 0 requires hidden_resource galatia
    TO
    recruit "warband sword heavy gaul" 0 requires factions { gauls, } and marian_reforms and not hidden_resource galatia_pl
    recruit "warband sword heavy gaul" 0 requires factions { slavs, } and marian_reforms
    ;AoR
    recruit "warband galatian" 0 requires factions { barbarian, } and not factions { gauls, } and hidden_resource galatia
    ADDED
    ;Galatians
    recruit "warband galatian" 0 requires factions { gauls, } and hidden_resource galatia_pl

    By the way, is the AoR line in the original export_descr_buildings.txt / barracks_four_barbarian correct? I was under the impression that "requires faction { all, }" was obligatory.

    As for the campaign, a Britannia campaign would certainly be better - will be looking forward to it! If I get time to mess around with the text files, I might try and set up an Ancyra provincial myself, since it shouldn't be too complicated.

    司徒華 - 默寫的謊言掩蓋不了血寫的歷史
    (Szeto Wah - Lies written in ink cannot cover history written in blood)

  7. #7
    DimeBagHo's Avatar Praeses
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    7,943

    Default Re: Galatian Swordsman

    If a unit is recruitable by all factions it's fine to leave out the "requires factions" part, though there was another minor error with the Galatians AoR, so thanks for pointing that out.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Galatian Swordsman

    Good to know, thanks!

    司徒華 - 默寫的謊言掩蓋不了血寫的歷史
    (Szeto Wah - Lies written in ink cannot cover history written in blood)

  9. #9
    Zarax's Avatar Triple Chaosmaster
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    8,382

    Default Re: Galatian Swordsman

    I actually think the old galatian skin fits well for a mercenary gallic swordmen unit which is something XGM still misses IIRC
    The Best Is Yet To Come:

  10. #10
    knguyen_93's Avatar Civis
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Osaka, Japan
    Posts
    199

    Default Re: Galatian Swordsman

    I just dont care about their skin until my Gallic army reach Asia Minor, the heavy swordmen and galatian swordmen look exactly the same

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •