Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: And the prize goes to ... IAEA ...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default And the prize goes to ... IAEA ...

    ... and Mohammed El-Baradei.

    Oslo has done the sensible: This time they gave the peace nobel to people who really deserve it. And it's a slap in the face for all those nuclear powers who just can't let the weapons be.

  2. #2
    MoROmeTe's Avatar For my name is Legion
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    An apartment in Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    2,538

    Default

    It seems we are, as a world running out of legendary figures to give the Nobel peace prize to, se we are awarding it to organizations that really do not do that much.

    And I think this years Nobel is far better than last years, to the African I-do-not-know-her-name ecology activist...


    In the long run, we are all dead - John Maynard Keynes
    Under the patronage of Lvcivs Vorenvs
    Holding patronage upon the historical tvrcopolier and former patron of the once fallen, risen from the ashes and again fallen RvsskiSoldat

  3. #3
    Mr.Flint's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Another idiotic decision by Oslo.............. but then atleast its not Bono or Geldoff.....

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Flint
    Another idiotic decision by Oslo.............. but then atleast its not Bono or Geldoff.....
    Actually Id say I think Bono and Geldoff are far more deserving if you are comparing them to IAEA, atleast Bono and Geldoff have something to show for their effort

  5. #5
    Mr.Flint's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by danzig
    Actually Id say I think Bono and Geldoff are far more deserving if you are comparing them to IAEA, atleast Bono and Geldoff have something to show for their effort
    Dunno,i found the bullying of PM Martin by Bono as quite disgusting.... (as well as his support for the Liberal party of Canada, and his appearance on the caucus)

  6. #6
    MoROmeTe's Avatar For my name is Legion
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    An apartment in Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    2,538

    Default

    Bono walking away with the Nobel peace prize would be better than IAEA walking away with it...


    In the long run, we are all dead - John Maynard Keynes
    Under the patronage of Lvcivs Vorenvs
    Holding patronage upon the historical tvrcopolier and former patron of the once fallen, risen from the ashes and again fallen RvsskiSoldat

  7. #7
    Mr.Flint's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Hard to expect good choices from people who gave a Nobel peace prize to Arafat...
    anyway Bono is only slightly lower than IAEA in my list of people deserving a peace prize.... and both of them are not in the top 10.

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.Flint
    Another idiotic decision by Oslo.............. but then atleast its not Bono or Geldoff.....
    agreed. People who actually did their job properly should desirve it.

    However this same group gave arafat the prize....
    Swear filters are for sites run by immature children.

  9. #9
    ajimenez3's Avatar Ducenarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Posts
    915

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PacSubCom
    ... and Mohammed El-Baradei.

    Oslo has done the sensible: This time they gave the peace nobel to people who really deserve it. And it's a slap in the face for all those nuclear powers who just can't let the weapons be.
    Yhea we have Iran about to go Nuclear, lets not forget Pakistan and India and that great stable regime of North Korea already being there.
    Yhea lets give an award to a person and org. that cannot even do their job.
    Makes as much sense as giving the award to a terrorist. Oslo and the prize has become nothing but a joke.

    Semper Fi
    Arturo
    I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I expect the same from them.
    John Bernard Books

    Proud Member of the TWC Plebians/Peasants

  10. #10
    MoROmeTe's Avatar For my name is Legion
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    An apartment in Bucharest, Romania
    Posts
    2,538

    Default

    Certainly not a joke... but rather a form of myth creation in this lack-oflideal world...


    In the long run, we are all dead - John Maynard Keynes
    Under the patronage of Lvcivs Vorenvs
    Holding patronage upon the historical tvrcopolier and former patron of the once fallen, risen from the ashes and again fallen RvsskiSoldat

  11. #11
    Tom Paine's Avatar Mr Common Sense
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Silver Spring, Maryland (inside the Beltway)
    Posts
    33,698

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ajimenez3
    Yhea we have Iran about to go Nuclear, lets not forget Pakistan and India and that great stable regime of North Korea already being there.
    Yhea lets give an award to a person and org. that cannot even do their job.
    Makes as much sense as giving the award to a terrorist. Oslo and the prize has become nothing but a joke.
    Lets see. Iran going nuclear? Well itsentitled to nuclear power. India and Pakistan: helped by Cold-War politics and line-drawing, in fact India had the US undermining the IAEA, and N. Korea was not a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty....

  12. #12
    ajimenez3's Avatar Ducenarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Texas, USA
    Posts
    915

    Default

    Lets see. Iran going nuclear? Well itsentitled to nuclear power.
    Yes they are, but let's not be niave and foolish to think they are not trying to build a bomb. They have fooled the IAEA and Baradia.

    India and Pakistan: helped by Cold-War politics and line-drawing, in fact India had the US undermining the IAEA,
    The IAEA failed to stop both and I have nothing to prove the US undermined the IAEA. What would be gained in that?

    N. Korea was not a signatory to the Non-Proliferation Treaty....
    Yes and once again another failure of the IAEA to have any power to stop them or influnce them.

    My main point is that Baradai and the IAEA got a Peace Prize, so what did they do to earn it this last year or any of the previous years? That is what makes the Nobel Peace Prize worthless at this point in time.
    It first started when they gave it to a terrorist and murderer and it has just been downhill from there.


    Semper Fi
    Arturo
    I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I expect the same from them.
    John Bernard Books

    Proud Member of the TWC Plebians/Peasants

  13. #13
    imb39's Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Patrician Citizen Administrator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    20,872

    Default

    So, ajimenez3, who would you prefer to get the prize? The options are rather limited.

  14. #14
    Erik's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    15,653

    Default

    The IAEA deserves it.
    They are one of the most important factor in preventing a war against Iran.

    But I understand why some people are so unhappy: they WANT to go to war with Iran... well, it's a PEACE price.



  15. #15
    Mr.Flint's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,300

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Erik
    The IAEA deserves it.
    They are one of the most important factor in preventing a war against Iran.

    But I understand why some people are so unhappy: they WANT to go to war with Iran... well, it's a PEACE price.
    um so far the IAEA arent very succesful in preventing a war against Iran....
    remember prizes given for something finished, not for the effort.

  16. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Erik
    The IAEA deserves it.
    They are one of the most important factor in preventing a war against Iran.

    But I understand why some people are so unhappy: they WANT to go to war with Iran... well, it's a PEACE price.
    Actually by that logic Bush's approval ratings should be given the prize.
    Swear filters are for sites run by immature children.

  17. #17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Erik
    The IAEA deserves it.
    They are one of the most important factor in preventing a war against Iran.
    Er Id say Iraq has more to do with it then IAEA and Id say Iran isnt totally clear or safe from some type of response.

    But I understand why some people are so unhappy: they WANT to go to war with Iran... well, it's a PEACE price.
    Nonsense some people just arent naive enough to trust a country who's motto is death to america, death to israel...hell Im amazed they dont have it printed on their currency. Peace at any cost isnt a peace worth having, havent we learned anything from history that sticking ones head in the sand doesnt make things magically ok.

  18. #18
    Erik's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    15,653

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by danzig
    But I understand why some people are so unhappy: they WANT to go to war with Iran... well, it's a PEACE price.
    Nonsense some people just arent naive enough to trust a country who's motto is death to america, death to israel...hell Im amazed they dont have it printed on their currency. Peace at any cost isnt a peace worth having, havent we learned anything from history that sticking ones head in the sand doesnt make things magically ok.
    This was exactly what I was talking about.

    The Nobel peace prize should not question if peace is actually a good thing.
    Just as the Nobel physics prize should not question if advancements in physics are actually a good thing.

    So you beleive Iran is evil and should be attacked? good for you.
    Alfred Nobel beleived peace was always a good thing, and it's HIS price and HIS money.
    Us mortals just have to live with it.

    Maybe if you make a whole lot of money you can establish a "fight war for good" price.



  19. #19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Erik
    This was exactly what I was talking about.

    The Nobel peace prize should not question if peace is actually a good thing.
    Just as the Nobel physics prize should not question if advancements in physics are actually a good thing.

    So you beleive Iran is evil and should be attacked? good for you.
    Alfred Nobel beleived peace was always a good thing, and it's HIS price and HIS money.
    Us mortals just have to live with it.

    Maybe if you make a whole lot of money you can establish a "fight war for good" price.
    And thats will Ill disagree with you 100%, as I said peace for the sake of peace that doesnt create a 'real' peace is meaningless. Was Munich Agreement a useful 'peace agreement'? I never said Iran was evil or that it deserved to be attacked, do not put words in my mouth but I do think it is premature to say it has escaped any action. You wish to give the benfit of the doubt to a country that in my eyes doesnt deserve it, difference of opinion I guess. All well and good if you believe peace prizes should be given to those who have done nothing for real peace then great. And I wasnt aware Nobel was brought back from the death to pick the winners.
    Last edited by danzig; October 08, 2005 at 01:55 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •