Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: Cataphracts historically accurate?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Dave Strider's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    17,465

    Default Cataphracts historically accurate?

    First off, I said gulp because I expected people to be calling me a n00b because I think that Cataphracts are actually right.

    Second, Are cataphracts one of the only things that CA got right?

    I mean, look at this article:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cataphract
    See the pic on the right? Compare it with this:


    How.Freaky.Is.That.
    when the union's inspiration through the worker's blood shall run,
    there can be no power greater anywhere beneath the sun,
    yet what force on earth is weaker than the feeble strength of one?
    but the union makes us strong.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Historically accurate? In Vanilla RTW??

    The RTW Vanilla cataphracts aren't as bad as some other units, but there are better renderings in the mods. Remember that RTW depicts early Parthians, whereas the picture supposedly depicts a Sassanid guy.

    I assume you wanted to say "I wanna play Europa Barbarorum or RTR, but don't have the links"?

  3. #3

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Or maybe he realized all that matters is MP
    "An anonymous 6th century Roman military treatise also proposed one exotic experimental unit of scythed chariots with cataphract lancers mounted on the chariot's horses, though there is no evidence that this unit ever materialised."
    HELL YEAH! WWAnt WANT WANT!!!
    Last edited by |Sith| Max; April 03, 2010 at 02:23 PM.


  4. #4

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Quote Originally Posted by |Sith|9|Lord_Max View Post
    Or maybe he realized all that matters is MP
    "An anonymous 6th century Roman military treatise also proposed one exotic experimental unit of scythed chariots with cataphract lancers mounted on the chariot's horses, though there is no evidence that this unit ever materialised."
    HELL YEAH! WWAnt WANT WANT!!!
    well this seems a perfect point to put forward my new ideas for units in RTW!

    I present: The Roamiot and Roamvolution!

    Roamiot: A scythed chariot, pulled by 4 horses to make it uber fast with lancers in it and archers riding the horses. The perfect way to go Roaming!

    Roamvolution: We put Cannons on the back of our horses so the driver can shoot using teh 1337 device! Oh and we have longer scythes...ummm yh

    In fact i've invented a whole new faction Roaming Eagles!




    Note: This probably counts as spam. If you are unhappy with my conduct please direct all complaints to Eagle for encouraging me. Thanks.

  5. #5
    Dave Strider's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    17,465

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Yeah, I thought someone would like that

    MP matters alot, yes
    when the union's inspiration through the worker's blood shall run,
    there can be no power greater anywhere beneath the sun,
    yet what force on earth is weaker than the feeble strength of one?
    but the union makes us strong.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Mmm yes. It absolutely does.


  7. #7
    Cornelius Plautus's Avatar Centenarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Brundisium
    Posts
    836

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    From what I can tell, the unit is accurate... for Barbarian Invasion. Earlier Cataphracts probably looked nothing like that; their armor was probably less polished and their horses probably looked different. Most of Rome: Total War is accurate, but not for the time period it is trying to portray. What else do you expect from anything mainstream?


    -Click on the Eagle for a Surprise!-

  8. #8

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cornelius Plautus View Post
    From what I can tell, the unit is accurate... for Barbarian Invasion. Earlier Cataphracts probably looked nothing like that; their armor was probably less polished and their horses probably looked different. Most of Rome: Total War is accurate, but not for the time period it is trying to portray. What else do you expect from anything mainstream?
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the accounts of the Battle of Carrhae, isn't it implied that the cataphracts had highly polished armour?
    Or is Carrhae late enough to surpass the "earlier" qualification?
    Alea Iacta Est (The Die is Cast) - Gaius Julius Caesar
    An army of sheep led by a lion is better than an army of lions led by a sheep - Alexander the Great
    We will either find a way, or make one - Hannibal Barca

  9. #9
    Cornelius Plautus's Avatar Centenarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Brundisium
    Posts
    836

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Barca the Great View Post
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but in the accounts of the Battle of Carrhae, isn't it implied that the cataphracts had highly polished armour?
    Or is Carrhae late enough to surpass the "earlier" qualification?

    Yes, that's a bit later. I mean the 276 BC starting point of the game.


    -Click on the Eagle for a Surprise!-

  10. #10

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cornelius Plautus View Post
    Yes, that's a bit later. I mean the 276 BC starting point of the game.
    Ah, makes sense. I wasn't sure.
    Alea Iacta Est (The Die is Cast) - Gaius Julius Caesar
    An army of sheep led by a lion is better than an army of lions led by a sheep - Alexander the Great
    We will either find a way, or make one - Hannibal Barca

  11. #11
    Hader's Avatar Things are very seldom what they seem. In my experience, they’re usually a damn sight worse.
    Administrator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    13,166
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Yes cataphracts are fairly accurate, but for one....its RTW vanilla. Nuff said.

    And your source is wikipedia. Even if just a picture...nothing impressive.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    I think they were just trying to field more pwnage units. Without cata RTW would not be as fun


  13. #13
    Dave Strider's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    17,465

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    It might be either, I really don't know, it just scared me how close the comparison was.
    when the union's inspiration through the worker's blood shall run,
    there can be no power greater anywhere beneath the sun,
    yet what force on earth is weaker than the feeble strength of one?
    but the union makes us strong.

  14. #14
    leseras's Avatar Miles
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    329

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    the Scythians, Assyrians, Sarmatians, Parthian dynasties, Achaemenid Empire, Sakas, Armenia, Seleucids, Pergamenes, the Sassanid Empire, the Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. Thats what the article said, yay for parthia
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...89#post6791289 My first and epic failure AAR
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...22#post6976522 My second ongoing AAR
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [IMG][/IMG]
    God bless you! Oh wait you're an atheist? Then god DAMN YOU!

  15. #15
    Delta21's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Chişinău, Moldova
    Posts
    464

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Cataphracts ftw....I don't see why sassanid cataphracts wouldn't look like parthian ones...after all this elite lancer military unit should have had a long tradition in the middle-east considering its succes...and don't forget that the sassanids descend from the parthian kingdom.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    They got them right except for one minor detail, historically the Romans effectively countered the cataphracts by using slingers, try doing that in the game...

  17. #17

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Quote Originally Posted by Warhammster View Post
    They got them right except for one minor detail, historically the Romans effectively countered the cataphracts by using slingers, try doing that in the game...

    how does that work?

  18. #18
    leseras's Avatar Miles
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    329

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Quote Originally Posted by Warhammster View Post
    They got them right except for one minor detail, historically the Romans effectively countered the cataphracts by using slingers, try doing that in the game...
    I think you phrased it wrongly. Try doing that in the game...if you want to get slaughtered.
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...89#post6791289 My first and epic failure AAR
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...22#post6976522 My second ongoing AAR
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [IMG][/IMG]
    God bless you! Oh wait you're an atheist? Then god DAMN YOU!

  19. #19

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    Quote Originally Posted by leseras View Post
    I think you phrased it wrongly. Try doing that in the game...if you want to get slaughtered.
    Yep that's right, I thought my smiley would make that clear to all but maybe not

  20. #20
    Dave Strider's Avatar Dux Limitis
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    17,465

    Default Re: Cataphracts - *gulp* Historically accurate?

    I understood the meaning.

    The only reason that wouldn't work is that you would to have your slingers behind your infantry...Slingers can only fire straight forward, thus killing your troops.
    when the union's inspiration through the worker's blood shall run,
    there can be no power greater anywhere beneath the sun,
    yet what force on earth is weaker than the feeble strength of one?
    but the union makes us strong.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •