Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    I have always heard that Roman auxilia would fight in the army for sixteen to twenty years and then gain Roman citizenship upon finishing their service.

    But a question: What about the auxilia who, le gasp, died in battle before completing heir service term?

  2. #2
    hellheaven1987's Avatar Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Hell called Conscription
    Posts
    35,615

    Default Re: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    They died as a foreigner, why??
    Quote Originally Posted by Markas View Post
    Hellheaven, sometimes you remind me of King Canute trying to hold back the tide, except without the winning parable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diocle View Post
    Cameron is midway between Black Rage and .. European Union ..

  3. #3

    Default Re: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    *sigh*

    My argument of fighting in the Roman auxilia for citizenship fails.

  4. #4
    hellheaven1987's Avatar Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Hell called Conscription
    Posts
    35,615

    Default Re: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    That depends, although it seems most tombstone we have suggested that they simply died as a foreigner and auxiliary status. Still, it was heavily depending on what term the auxiliary units agreed when they signed contract with Roman (auiliaries generally joined Roman military system in a whole unit), so it might not even require 20 years before those auxiliaries ever got citizenship.

    I am more interesting about the status of family of dead auxiliaries - would the descents had an immediate grant of citizenship?? I don't think so but it might be possible.
    Quote Originally Posted by Markas View Post
    Hellheaven, sometimes you remind me of King Canute trying to hold back the tide, except without the winning parable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diocle View Post
    Cameron is midway between Black Rage and .. European Union ..

  5. #5

    Default Re: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    That's what I was debating in the past few days. Exactly that.

    Any historical or archaerological evidence?

  6. #6
    hellheaven1987's Avatar Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Hell called Conscription
    Posts
    35,615

    Default Re: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    Quote Originally Posted by Argeus the Paladin View Post
    That's what I was debating in the past few days. Exactly that.

    Any historical or archaerological evidence?
    Why part you want?? Anyway, check out Adrian Goldsworthy's "Complete Roman Army", which I remember there is a photo of tombstone of an auxiliary member, which clearly printed his auxiliary status on the tombstone but not sure whether he was dead before or after the service was complete.

    For further information, check the same book.
    Quote Originally Posted by Markas View Post
    Hellheaven, sometimes you remind me of King Canute trying to hold back the tide, except without the winning parable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diocle View Post
    Cameron is midway between Black Rage and .. European Union ..

  7. #7
    Cornelius Plautus's Avatar Centenarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Brundisium
    Posts
    836

    Default Re: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    Quote Originally Posted by hellheaven1987 View Post
    Why part you want?? Anyway, check out Adrian Goldsworthy's "Complete Roman Army", which I remember there is a photo of tombstone of an auxiliary member, which clearly printed his auxiliary status on the tombstone but not sure whether he was dead before or after the service was complete.

    For further information, check the same book.

    That is one of the best possible books for a casual military enthusiast to get information on the Roman military.

    As for your question, I'd imagine that an auxiliary would need to live long enough to sign citizenship papers and be assigned the tria nomina to become a citizen, and that dead auxiliaries would just be thrown in unmarked graves, especially since there seemed to have been so many more of them that there were regular legionaries. Maybe, on the other hand, foreigners from the same culture as the perished auxiliary would give him an appropriate burial if they could find the body.


    -Click on the Eagle for a Surprise!-

  8. #8
    hellheaven1987's Avatar Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Hell called Conscription
    Posts
    35,615

    Default Re: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    Quote Originally Posted by Cornelius Plautus View Post
    That is one of the best possible books for a casual military enthusiast to get information on the Roman military.
    For casual people I only provide casual sources. Not want some people accuse me providing some thousands pages source to simply crush their mind.
    Quote Originally Posted by Markas View Post
    Hellheaven, sometimes you remind me of King Canute trying to hold back the tide, except without the winning parable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diocle View Post
    Cameron is midway between Black Rage and .. European Union ..

  9. #9
    Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Athenai
    Posts
    33,211

    Default Re: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    I think it's also important to keep in mind what year we're talking about here, as conditions of joining the auxilia changed throughout the course of the empire. Citizenship was an end-goal, but there were many details which changed over time, like who could join, where you'd serve, if your family became citizens or not, etc.

  10. #10
    hellheaven1987's Avatar Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Hell called Conscription
    Posts
    35,615

    Default Re: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    Quote Originally Posted by Stavroforos View Post
    I think it's also important to keep in mind what year we're talking about here, as conditions of joining the auxilia changed throughout the course of the empire. Citizenship was an end-goal, but there were many details which changed over time, like who could join, where you'd serve, if your family became citizens or not, etc.
    Change over time is rather not important, since there was no official rule how to recruit auxilia units under what condition. Like I said, auxilia units generally recruited in groups, not individual recriuts. Most time, a warband of foreigners would agree to sign contracts with Roman, and the condition of each contract was depending on what term the band and Roman agreed. Different units of course had different terms of service and would be granted once the purpose was served. It was much more like the mercenary system of Carthage overall.

    We know much less about auxilia because this chaotic condition (some auxilias were simply because their tribes agreed to provide warriors for tax free exchange). It also seems that some auxilias were equiped by Roman, while others were not.
    Last edited by hellheaven1987; March 30, 2010 at 12:14 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by Markas View Post
    Hellheaven, sometimes you remind me of King Canute trying to hold back the tide, except without the winning parable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diocle View Post
    Cameron is midway between Black Rage and .. European Union ..

  11. #11
    Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Athenai
    Posts
    33,211

    Default Re: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    Quote Originally Posted by hellheaven1987 View Post
    Change over time is rather not important, since there was no official rule how to recruit auxilia units under what condition. Like I said, auxilia units generally recruited in groups, not individual recriuts. Most time, a warband of foreigners would agree to sign contracts with Roman, and the condition of each contract was depending on what term the band and Roman agreed. Different units of course had different terms of service and would be granted once the purpose was served. It was much more like the mercenary system of Carthage overall.

    We know much less about auxilia because this chaotic condition (some auxilias were simply because their tribes agreed to provide warriors for tax free exchange). It also seems that some auxilias were equiped by Roman, while others were not.
    I was actually more referring to the ban (which Septimius Severus lifted or created) on giving citizenship to the families of auxiliaries out of the fear that troop numbers would dwindle without having non-Romans to recruit into the auxilia.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    How well were Roman auxiliaries treated by the Romans?

  13. #13
    hellheaven1987's Avatar Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Hell called Conscription
    Posts
    35,615

    Default Re: Minor question about Roman auxiliaries

    Quote Originally Posted by Burnum View Post
    How well were Roman auxiliaries treated by the Romans?
    Cannon fodder troops??

    It depends on period, regions and status. Military officers generally treated them fair (means follow the term of contract), but I am not sure about civilian officers.
    Quote Originally Posted by Markas View Post
    Hellheaven, sometimes you remind me of King Canute trying to hold back the tide, except without the winning parable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diocle View Post
    Cameron is midway between Black Rage and .. European Union ..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •