What were you expecting me to do? Challenge his Chariots to a one-on-one match like in the movie Troy? It only makes sense to outnumber any element of an opponent's army. Yes, I used my entire army against his chariots, what of it? The reality is that his Chariots were dead on the field, my Cav did not lose a single unit, and they became free as hell to do whatever they want.
Initially, my plan was make a feint with my cav to lure his chariots into my right wing then, while my cav swiveled to my left wing, I was going to cut off the chariots with my line of 3 Auxilia then surround them with my right wing. However, I figured that he might just try to follow my Cav wherever so I ran my cav THROUGH my formation and in his attempt to break off the chase, I was already too close to my soldiers and ran right into my Auxilia where they were promptly surrounded while my cav came out of the other end of my formation. Obviously while he was chasing my cav I'm not just going to keep my army idle so i set my Urbans to skirmish mode so I can kill the chariots faster. So was that cheap? Was that in anyway showing weakness? Did you expect me to just "man-it-out"? NO!
You think I'm weak for having to use my whole army to get rid of 3 chariots? Keep in mind that HE charged ME. My army didn't even move. All they've done was march up. It's called, "Utilization of resources to achieve the desired goal while maximizing the result". My resources were my Cohorts, Cavs, Archers, and Aux; My goal was to get rid of the Chariots early in the battle; my resolution is to use all the resources at my disposal to achieve that goal. The result was MAXIMUM carnage and my Cav was able to get on with their business without being ghosted by enemy chariots.
Therefore, I rate your reply to my comment...as a total fail
