Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 84

Thread: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Indefinitely Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    21,467

    Default Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Quote Originally Posted by diegis View Post
    13- And yes, i consider monotheism a superior form of spirituality, .
    from another thread; now i'm curious to know why some ppl would consider monotheism to be better than polytheism? do they think that monotheism will put ppl on the path to accepting their own monotheistic religion by thinking 'oh allah, YHWH, FSM, they're one and the same"

    discuss

  2. #2

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    No... it's not really. I would argue that monotheism provides more potential for conflict. If you believe there's loads of Gods then it's hardly going to be a surprise that the people over the hill have different ones. If you believe there's only one god, and a particularly successful civilisation is contradicting you or believing in a different one... well, that's a crusade.

  3. #3
    Scorch's Avatar One of Giga's Ladies
    Patrician

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    8,376

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    In fact religion, if you could really call the polytheistic belief systems we see prior to the rise of monotheism religions, wasn't always such a violent catalyst for conflict. When, as it was in the Mediterranean, there is a process whereby cultural exchange dictates that, in fact, most of the Gods of almost every civilization in the Mediterranean world have very similar roots and traditions, it acts as a catalysts for cultural exchange, literary engagement and the development of thought and trade. Wars were fought for political reasons prior to the rise of monotheism.
    Patronized by Ozymandias, Patron of Artorius Maximus, Scar Face, Ibn Rushd and Thanatos.

    The University of Sydney | Bachelor of Arts III (Majoring in Ancient History and Italian Studies)

    I do not fear death. I had been dead for billions and
    billions of years before I was born, and had not suffered the slightest inconvenience from it.
    - Mark Twain

    Godless Musings: A blog about why violent fairytale characters should not have any say in how our society is run.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Quote Originally Posted by Scorch View Post
    In fact religion, if you could really call the polytheistic belief systems we see prior to the rise of monotheism religions, wasn't always such a violent catalyst for conflict. When, as it was in the Mediterranean, there is a process whereby cultural exchange dictates that, in fact, most of the Gods of almost every civilization in the Mediterranean world have very similar roots and traditions, it acts as a catalysts for cultural exchange, literary engagement and the development of thought and trade. Wars were fought for political reasons prior to the rise of monotheism.
    Exactly. It amazes me that the Abrahamics generally don't have the intelligence to say, "Hey look we have exactly the same God, we just wear different hats."

  5. #5
    Monarchist's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,803

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrets54 View Post
    It amazes me that the Abrahamics generally don't have the intelligence to say, "Hey look we have exactly the same God, we just wear different hats."
    I'm one of the Abrahamics who rejects that blanket statement. Speaking for myself: there is no God but the One in Heaven; every other religion echoes that. When you look at single polytheistic religions, they really tend to fall into one category: celestial monarchy. Greek paganism, Roman polytheism, and every other facet thereof had some central god surrounded by others. They all may have been nominally "equal", but Zeus obviously towered over Athena and others. This rule applies equally to Jupiter, who was depicted as sitting on the heavenly throne with all the other Gods around him. I never heard of a Polytheism that expounded a Democracy of the Gods!

    It's quite amusing to look at Christian art from early codices, wherein each codex usually had a coloured frontispiece. On that piece was usually an image of Christ, but it was an ancient image; sans the halo and cross, it might have been a picture of Zeus or Jupiter or Ahura Mazdā. The Christians quite cleverly stole the original pagan images of cosmic government to use for Christ. It was a good move, obviously, as the imagery spread quickly across the Roman Empire, which was used to those images (albeit in a different form). Heavenly propaganda! Well, why not?

    I'm just trying to say that polytheism is almost always monotheism, with a few added characters. Zeus was YHWH was Jupiter was Ahura-Mazda was Brahma was Vishnu. The list of religions with one supreme god with many ulterior gods is a long one. Perhaps it's the same deity we're all trying to explain and reach? I tend to think so, citing the commonality of the One-God, even when surrounded by many lesser entities. Whether Hindus talk to it or Jews pray to it, it's still the same God with different interpretations thereof.
    "Pauci viri sapientiae student."
    Cicero

  6. #6

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrets54 View Post
    No... it's not really. I would argue that monotheism provides more potential for conflict. If you believe there's loads of Gods then it's hardly going to be a surprise that the people over the hill have different ones. If you believe there's only one god, and a particularly successful civilisation is contradicting you or believing in a different one... well, that's a crusade.

    That's why there were god's of war, god's of victory over war's and other god's like that for polytheistic religion, and it makes them much more non-violent then us. Because the Spartan's believed that they had to go to war, also to please there gods.

    Quote Originally Posted by basics View Post
    When we come to Islam, its failure starts by insisting that there is only one God, who has no Spirit and no Saviour thus cutting away two most essential elements to salvation.
    Thats right basics, thats why I keep telling you Christianity seems fishy and very polytheistic with the trinity.
    Last edited by Banana Jelly; March 10, 2010 at 02:52 PM.

  7. #7

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cool Story Brah View Post
    That's why there were god's of war, god's of victory over war's and other god's like that for polytheistic religion, and it makes them much more non-violent then us. Because the Spartan's believed that they had to go to war, also to please there gods.
    The Spartans avoided war unless it was absolutely necessary to their political agenda. They thought it would be unwise to "train their enemies" by fighting battles with them too frequently. They had the same gods as all the other Greeks and, although they alone of all Greeks sacrificed puppies to Ares, there was no temple for him in Sparta, unlike many other gods (especially Athena).

    The single greatest difference between ancient European polytheism and subsequent monotheism, from my perspective, is the handling of the idea of divine perfection. In the old pantheon, all the gods were created within the world, and as such were imperfect. In monotheism (Judaism, Christianity, later Islam), God existed outside the world, created the latter and was perfect. In the former system, there were many attempts to explain that problem of perfection, often casting Zeus in the role of the perfect creator, in later times, but there was still the great philosophical problem of a perfect being interacting with an imperfect world. The Christians brushed aside such concerns with an abandon that I find philosophically suspect, and cast the Judean god (who was far from perfect in his old role) as that perfect creator, who furthermore interacts with this world as a trinity. We can see an evolution of ideas, but that hardly makes monotheism "superior", since polytheistic systems had undergone a similar evolutionary process, culminating in even more intricate theologies, such as Neoplatonism.



  8. #8

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Quote Originally Posted by Scorch View Post
    In fact religion, if you could really call the polytheistic belief systems we see prior to the rise of monotheism religions, wasn't always such a violent catalyst for conflict. When, as it was in the Mediterranean, there is a process whereby cultural exchange dictates that, in fact, most of the Gods of almost every civilization in the Mediterranean world have very similar roots and traditions, it acts as a catalysts for cultural exchange, literary engagement and the development of thought and trade. Wars were fought for political reasons prior to the rise of monotheism.
    Not really. This was mainly, and pretty much only, the case with the Greeks and Romans. They largely viewed other religions as differing interpretations of their own (this wasn't rare with monotheism either. Christian missonaries tried to convince Pagans during the Middle Ages that all their Gods were in fact one, and later they tried to convince the Chinese that their Confucian vision of Heaven was comparable to the Christian vision of God). Other Polytheistic religions, like Germanic Paganism, African religions, Mesoamerican religions, Hinduism, Maori religions, etc were as blood thirsty and aggressive as any monotheistic religion, in many cases even more so.
    Quote Originally Posted by A.J.P. Taylor
    Peaceful agreement and government by consent are possible only on the basis of ideas common to all parties; and these ideas must spring from habit and from history. Once reason is introduced, every man, every class, every nation becomes a law unto itself; and the only right which reason understands is the right of the stronger. Reason formulates universal principles and is therefore intolerant: there can be only one rational society, one rational nation, ultimately one rational man. Decisions between rival reasons can be made only by force.





    Quote Originally Posted by H.L Spieghel
    Is het niet hogelijk te verwonderen, en een recht beklaaglijke zaak, Heren, dat alhoewel onze algemene Dietse taal een onvermengde, sierlijke en verstandelijke spraak is, die zich ook zo wijd als enige talen des werelds verspreidt, en die in haar bevang veel rijken, vorstendommen en landen bevat, welke dagelijks zeer veel kloeke en hooggeleerde verstanden uitleveren, dat ze nochtans zo zwakkelijk opgeholpen en zo weinig met geleerdheid verrijkt en versiert wordt, tot een jammerlijk hinder en nadeel des volks?
    Quote Originally Posted by Miel Cools
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen,
    Oud ben maar nog niet verrot.
    Zoals oude bomen zingen,
    Voor Jan Lul of voor hun god.
    Ook een oude boom wil reizen,
    Bij een bries of bij een storm.
    Zelfs al zit zijn kruin vol luizen,
    Zelfs al zit zijn voet vol worm.
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen.

    Cò am Fear am measg ant-sluaigh,
    A mhaireas buan gu bràth?
    Chan eil sinn uileadh ach air chuart,
    Mar dhìthein buaile fàs,
    Bheir siantannan na bliadhna sìos,
    'S nach tog a' ghrian an àird.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jörg Friedrich
    When do I stop being a justified warrior? When I've killed a million bad civilians? When I've killed three million bad civilians? According to a warsimulation by the Pentagon in 1953 the entire area of Russia would've been reduced to ruins with 60 million casualties. All bad Russians. 60 million bad guys. By how many million ''bad'' casualties do I stop being a knight of justice? Isn't that the question those knights must ask themselves? If there's no-one left, and I remain as the only just one,

    Then I'm God.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis Napoleon III, Des Idees Napoleoniennes
    Governments have been established to aid society to overcome the obstacles which impede its march. Their forms have been varied according to the problems they have been called to cure, and according to character of the people they have ruled over. Their task never has been, and never will be easy, because the two contrary elements, of which our existence and the nature of society is composed, demand the employment of different means. In view of our divine essence, we need only liberty and work; in view of our mortal nature, we need for our direction a guide and a support. A government is not then, as a distinguished economist has said, a necessary ulcer; it is rather the beneficent motive power of all social organisation.


    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfgang Held
    I walked into those baracks [of Buchenwald concentrationcamp], in which there were people on the three-layered bunkbeds. But only their eyes were alive. Emaciated, skinny figures, nothing more but skin and bones. One thinks that they are dead, because they did not move. Only the eyes. I started to cry. And then one of the prisoners came, stood by me for a while, put a hand on my shoulder and said to me, something that I will never forget: ''Tränen sind denn nicht genug, mein Junge,
    Tränen sind denn nicht genug.''

    Jajem ssoref is m'n korew
    E goochem mit e wenk, e nar mit e shtomp
    Wer niks is, hot kawsones

  9. #9
    Pious Agnost's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Whangarei, New Zealand
    Posts
    6,355

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Less gods = Less opinions to differ to yours.

  10. #10
    MathiasOfAthens's Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Stockholm, Sverige
    Posts
    22,877

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Polytheism can exist alongside other Polytheistic beliefs. Take the Roman and Persian Empires for example. Although the Roman example is more well known, we have hundreds of cults and beliefs that coexisted relatively peacefully up until the 4th century. Judaism was around a lot longer than Christianity which is in all respects just a cult of Judaism. What allowed the Jewish beliefs to coexist in the Roman Empire without trying to convert the masses as the Christians later did.

    Christianity could not accept any other religion that opposes its view on a one single all knowing god. Even though it was given freedom to worship it had to take more. It had to outlaw other peoples rights to worship as well. How do you explain the growth of Monotheism in a pagan empire and the death of Paganism in a Monotheistic Empire. The Christians would claim that they were persecuted at the hands of the Pagan Emperors, in arenas. They may have been on a case by case basis. But there was never a Imperial campaign to wipe out or convert every last Christian as much as the Christian did. From the mid 4th century it really only took a little less than 60 years for Monotheism to become the dominant religion and for Pagan beliefs to be outlawed. Compared the growth of Christian beliefs in a pagan society.

    Now Julian the Apostate comes to mind. But was his ultimate goal to outlaw Christianity or just return the Empire to its roots, of a Pagan Society.

    After Julian enter Constantinopolis, despite his rejection of Christianity, his first political act was to preside over Constantius' Christian burial, escorting the body to the Church of the Apostles, where it was placed alongside that of Constantine.

    The guy was no Theodosius. I believe he appointed both Christians and Pagans to seats of power, but the guy was great in other ways as well. He idealized the perfect ruler as being first among equals or subject to the same laws as the people. He viewed Constantine as of eroding the power of the empire, for the degrading state the empire was in. Julian did not seek absolutism but devolved most of the power to the cities and dismissed much of the Bureaucrats.

    My point is... here we have the last Pagan Emperor after the first Christian Emperor. The later made many choices that directly affected the freedom of worship while the former sought a balance between the two and made no laws or decrees that could match the anti-paganism laws of later emperors.

    Truly the world would be a better place had Julian survived.

  11. #11
    SorelusImperion's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Veldarin Empire
    Posts
    2,845

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    No... it's not really. I would argue that monotheism provides more potential for conflict
    It depends on the individual's interpretation of his faith. It is pretty easy for a monotheist to assume that the many gods of the strange foreign folks living abroad are mere aspects of the one true god he is worshipping. Similar to how you said it in this sentence:
    "Hey look we have exactly the same God, we just wear different hats."
    In turn if you look at the Atztecs you'll find A LOT of religiously motivated violence commited by a polytheistic society. I am also sure we could find a quite a few examples of wars lead in the name of "god" if we look at ancient Europe though of course the religious reasons were "Esus demands more blood" rather than ""they don't believe in our gods".
    Frederick II of Prussia: "All Religions are equal and good, if only the people that practice them are honest people; and if Turks and heathens came and wanted to live here in this country, we would build them mosques and churches."
    Norge: "Give me a break. Nothing would make you happier than to see the eagle replaced with a crescent."

    Ummon:"enforcing international law will require that the enforcers do not respect it"
    Olmstead v USA:"Crime is contagious. If the government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; it invites every man to become a law unto himself; it invites anarchy. To declare that in the administration of the criminal law the end justifies the means-to declare that the government may commit crimes in order to secure the conviction of a private criminal-would bring terrible retribution. Against that pernicious doctrine this court should resolutely set its face."








    Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who can't defend themselfs.
    When you stand before god you can not say "I was told by others to do this" or that virtue was not convenient at the time

  12. #12

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Sure, I think it's a fair point that my post was eurocentric. Even with Indo-European polytheism you can see conflict occuring as some cultures moved away from practices such as human sacrifice. The Romans made human sacrifices as late as the Second Punic War, which sits very uneasily with their Carthaginian targetted propaganda.

  13. #13
    basics's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Scotland, UK.
    Posts
    11,239

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    " now i'm curious to know why some ppl would consider monotheism to be better than polytheism? do they think that monotheism will put ppl on the path to accepting their own monotheistic religion by thinking 'oh allah, YHWH, FSM, they're one and the same""

    Exarch,

    If we consider the Christian God it can be seen that He functions by having three distinct personalities in the one entity. And if we look at Judaism we see that the very same God is quite apparent without the need of a Saviour in the sense of the aforementioned God. But that is not down to God, rather the Jews, still bound in the Law, see Messias as a worldly figure who doesn't give them eternal life but one who gives them wordly supremacy.

    So their God is the God of the Christian and always has been. That in part they have been blinded to Jesus Christ is the reason why their form in Judaism has never as yet been complete. Since it is God that sanctifies it follows that some of them will know and accept Jesus Christ right up until the eve of the last day. They can't see it but God has reserved for Himself a remnant from out of that people.

    So we find in Christianity and Judaism that their God is active, is always working, to bring men and women to Him and them that are converted live by that power for the rest of their lives. Indeed it is a way of life that others cannot fathom. It must be remembered that men cannot choose God, rather that God chooses them so not all Jews will be saved any more than all Gentiles will be.

    When we come to Islam, its failure starts by insisting that there is only one God, who has no Spirit and no Saviour thus cutting away two most essential elements to salvation. Indeed it rests on God at some point after death having mercy where according to His Law none can be given after death. There is no one to resurrect them to eternal life since they died in their sin, it never having been erased before death by a Saviour.

    Thankfully, since it is God who does sanctify and does so through revelation of Jesus Christ, no matter what a man is, be sure that He will and does save men and women out of Islam or any other set of beliefs that permeate this planet. So is God the same for all? In terms of who saves who, He certainly is. Any separation comes in the minds of men where their imagination conjures up what Scripture calls another God, another Jesus and another Spirit.

    It is written that there is only one Faith, one Spirit and one Lord over all.

  14. #14
    Fiyenyaa's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Posts
    2,664

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Quote Originally Posted by basics View Post
    It is written that there is only one Faith, one Spirit and one Lord over all.
    The opposite is also written.
    You're going to have to come up with a better reason than that.

  15. #15
    MathiasOfAthens's Avatar Comes Rei Militaris
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Stockholm, Sverige
    Posts
    22,877

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    The Celts, Gaels, Germans continued ritual human sacrificing much longer than near eastern and Roman cultures. In fact, there is very little evidence to support any conclusion that the Greeks had human sacrifice.

    In Rome the most brutal of the human sacrifices were to bury POWs and Vestal Virgins alive as an offering to the gods of the underworld. Archaeologist have found human remains below buildings. Other rituals that were more common were gladiatorial matches of ritual combat to the death, ritual strangulation of captured war leaders (Vircengetorix), Criminals could be executed as an offering to the gods. Human Sacrifice was official but largely symbolically banned in 97 BC. By then it had become extremely rare. Personally I could imagine the human sacrifices to Manes was rare in itself by cults around the Empire. And not something sponsored by the government.

    In Greece there are 3 sites that support human sacrifice but they date to the Pre-Hellenic Minoan civilization.

    The Wicker man is quite well known use of human sacrifice among the celts and the druids. Often those killed were nothing more than peasants or warriors captured in battle. Which ever was easier.

    According to Greek and Romans sources the Carthaginians sacrificed infants, and numerous bones have been found in Carthage. However, this issue is still highly controversial.

    In the Bible, Genesis, Qur'an there are numerous references to human sacrifice. For Example. After a battle with the Israelites the King of Moab offered up his first born son and heir as a burnt offering to the gods.


    EDIT: I forgot to add archaeologist discovered the remains of a person sacrificed to Odin in the 11th century. Somewhere in Scandinavia.
    Last edited by MathiasOfAthens; March 10, 2010 at 06:23 AM.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    A fair summary. It would be extremely unusual if the ancient Jews didn't practice human sacrifice, as their neighbours seem to have done so.

  17. #17
    Cornelius Plautus's Avatar Centenarius
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Brundisium
    Posts
    836

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ferrets54 View Post
    A fair summary. It would be extremely unusual if the ancient Jews didn't practice human sacrifice, as their neighbours seem to have done so.
    There does seem to be a lot of stigma attached to what the ancient Jews did or did not do. It would make sense for them to sacrifice either people or animals to God, because at that point in history, sacrifices did take on a more literal meaning. I find this doubly true when I hear (common?) misconception that the Jews never fought, or had their own fighting forces in the Ancient World, which is obviously untrue since the Old Testament is choc full of warrior heroes like Joshua and Gideon, and, of course, Flavius Josephus informs us of the Jewish Wars, during which -apparently- the Jews were something of a considerable enemy to Vespasian and Titus.

    In my opinion, polytheism and monotheism are simply worship choices, and to call one superior to the other is to insult some rather civilized cultures. Say what you will about the decadent lifestyles of some of the Romans, but their contributions to Western Society make them a clearly civilized people. Of course, there are also the Indians, whose polytheistic Hindu beliefs have supported an amazing society over the Ages, even when the British Empire had annexed them as a territory.

    When people speak of the savageries of polytheists, it is important to remember that contemporary monotheists were no Saints, either. Christian and Muslims who demanded conversion could be commensurately barbaric to their polytheistic counterparts, save that they killed those who refused to convert in the name of God, rather than dedicating the sacrificed lives of their victims to one of many deities.


    -Click on the Eagle for a Surprise!-

  18. #18
    MaximiIian's Avatar Comes Limitis
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Louisville, Kentucky
    Posts
    12,890

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Quote Originally Posted by Scorch
    if you could really call the polytheistic belief systems we see prior to the rise of monotheism religions,
    I don't see why you couldn't. They fit pretty much all the conceivable definitions of a religion.

    Quote Originally Posted by Monarchist View Post
    Speaking for myself: there is no God but the One in Heaven; every other religion echoes that.
    Or it could be monotheism taking the notion of a chief god and blowing it out of proportion into "the only god" territory. Considering that monotheism arrived fairly late on the scene and mostly sprang out of a small set of closely related cultures.

    Quote Originally Posted by Cornelius Plautus View Post
    In my opinion, polytheism and monotheism are simply worship choices, and to call one superior to the other is to insult some rather civilized cultures.
    I tend to believe in this principle. I myself am a polytheist, and I believe polytheism to be true; but this doesn't necessarily mean that I think I am only and always right. My opinions are a reflection of my personal experience, which points to polytheism for me. Others' opinions might point them elsewhere, and as I have the possibility of error, I am in no place to judge.

  19. #19
    Sir Winston Churchill's Avatar Vicarius Provinciae
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    11,515

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    I just think he means it's easier to keep track of who's who. Otherwise I see nothing superior about it or anything else.

    Links to any anti-developer or anti-publisher campaigns are not tolerated on these forums. Any such links will be removed and (most probably) the poster of the link banned.... Please be advised that any information uploaded or transmitted by visitors to Sega becomes the property of Sega. Sega reserves the right to... modify... or delete any of this information at any time and for any reason without notice.
    — CA trying to prevent dissent on their forums
    Quote Originally Posted by Dalminar View Post
    My statements are correct by virtue of me saying them. Additional proof is not required.

  20. #20
    Monarchist's Avatar Civitate
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    4,803

    Default Re: Is Monotheism Superior to Polytheism?

    Quote Originally Posted by Isaristh View Post
    I just think he means it's easier to keep track of who's who. Otherwise I see nothing superior about it or anything else.
    This recalls to mind: Whatever you are, be a good one.
    "Pauci viri sapientiae student."
    Cicero

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •