Why do so many religions take such a dim view of it? Hedonism is what drives human beings, it's our reason for living. Even the religious value of self denial is just another form of self gratification when you think a bout it for a moment.
Why do so many religions take such a dim view of it? Hedonism is what drives human beings, it's our reason for living. Even the religious value of self denial is just another form of self gratification when you think a bout it for a moment.
Support Russia!
Because it was detrimental to the societies where the religions were born.
No actually, it's what drove them. Whether they admit it or not, these religions are themselves motivated by it.
Support Russia!
If people esteemed self-gratification as much as they do now in every moment of history, "people" would not be alive. It's hard to discuss this since morality is primarily founded on a primarily metaphysical basis, and thus reasoning it is difficult, but until the birth of High Finance and hyper-civilization... Or maybe even in later stages of civilizations driven by it, hedonism and material self-gratification were mostly condemned.
For us in the "West", it was only after 1950, with the decline of nationalistic feelings (pretty much one of the few higher ideals to survive the depredations of the Enlightenment and indeed to be born out of it) together with the rise of consumerism, the "feel-good" culture of today achieved its recognizable expression. It is convenient, since when business dominates the state, not only are wars and great efforts taxing and prejudicial for profit, but a gradually higher demand for pleasure bringing implements results in more profit. Here, the pacifist ideologue and the matter-of-fact businessman with an eye for money but none for abstract moral concerns join their hands.
"Romans not only easily conquered those who fought by cutting, but mocked them too. For the cut, even delivered with force, frequently does not kill, when the vital parts are protected by equipment and bone. On the contrary, a point brought to bear is fatal at two inches; for it is necessary that whatever vital parts it penetrates, it is immersed. Next, when a cut is delivered, the right arm and flank are exposed. However, the point is delivered with the cover of the body and wounds the enemy before he sees it."
- Flavius Vegetius Renatus (in Epitoma Rei Militari, ca. 390)
There's really no point in replying properly here, as it's obvious all the atheists just want to be hedonists. The answer that is most truthful would never appeal to you men anyway. Even if the very most factual and honest answer were given, it would not jibe with your wish to have Earthly pleasure at all costs.
LULZ EF ONLEH THEY'D KEPT 2 THEIR DISSIRTS, WE'D ALL B HAVING A GUD TEIM!
Nonsense; utter nonsense.
"Pauci viri sapientiae student."
Cicero
But is :wub: hedonism, Monarchist? Is :wub: inherently immoral, because it strikes me as very compatible with Christian beliefs in no sex before marriage.
Like animals are conditioned to search for food a form of self gratification so are we a more evolved type of animal.
And yes you are right religions are driven by self gratification eternal life anyone ?
Wtf is that ? lol thats self gratification in its fullest.
I accept that im worm food the only thing I can do is search for pleasure and make a difference somewhere somehow.
.........
if I know. I believe we should affirm and celebrate life and the good things it gives to us.
I probably have different reasons than others would, though. My religion is, at its core, a fertility cult honouring deities of fertility, wisdom, and nature. The celebration of life, especially fertility, is seen as a celebration of nature and the gods.
Last edited by MaximiIian; March 05, 2010 at 05:32 AM.
So is Christianity. Christianity is very linked to and influenced by sun worship in various forms, and of course part of sun worship is its symbolic fertility.
Everything in moderation.
The sexually anorexic will claim otherwise, but hey, they're sick anyway,them.
![]()
let's tally what religion does for population.Why do so many religions take such a dim view of it?
->no homosexuality.
->must get married to have sex, so everyone gets married very young
->can't :wub:
->must ejaculate inside a womens vagina
->must propagate israel's children
->positive psychology, reduces suicide rates, better self esteem
i think the trick to understanding why people are naturally religious or not religious is related to population vs. quality.
since the agricultural revolution, populations that increase quickly win. israel was at one of the hearts of the agricultural revolution. there was also a revolution in irrigation that massively increased the population limit in that region. so is it any surprise that the group obsessed with procreation won?
Last edited by handsome pete; March 05, 2010 at 07:52 AM.
Self gratification is in it's most basic element giving in to temptation and that is what most religions are all about not doing.
The scribes on all the people shove
And bawl allegiance to the state,
But they who love the greater love
Lay down their life; they do not hate
You mean like the temptation to believe to have a personal relationship with the creator of the universe, to be determined by God to go on missions, orgasmic mass rapture, or the power to lead and teach the "sheep"? I rather disagree, since the ultimate reason to be motivated to do something is the expectation of benefit, even if it's only emotional (like giving cheeky comments 4 moar rep).
Well youre assuming the goal of a religious society is to enable some sort of progression in human development, when in reality i'd say religion attempts to do the exact opposite. Which is to say, it attempts to preserve to status quo in all things by minimising excess in human behaviour - excess being one of the things that leads to conflict in a society.