View Poll Results: Mordor? Or Rome?

Voters
25. You may not vote on this poll
  • Mordor

    11 44.00%
  • Rome

    14 56.00%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28

Thread: Rome vs. Mordor

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    D.B. Cooper's Avatar Tribunus
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    7,119

    Default Rome vs. Mordor

    The city of Rome in 100AD, along with all the vitals of government and military, is transported via cosmic energy to Middle Earth, between Rohan and Gondor. But the forces of Mordor are on the move. Minas Tirith has fallen. Sauron attempts to form an alliance with this new power, but the Romans are horrified at these monsters and beheads the diplomats. Sauron declares war.

    The Witch-King commands mumakil, trolls, orcs, Harad, Southrons, and his company of Nazgul. Rome has legions, discipline, ballistas, etc.

    The hammer-stroke will far hardest on Rome! If it falls, then nothing stands between Mordor and the kingdom of Rohan. They face off on some plains. Who wins in this titanic battle?


  2. #2

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    Mordor of course. They don't have to wait 17-18 years to produce a new soldier, plus, they have mumakils. Mumakils!

  3. #3

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    Is this even a question? Oliphaunts, Nazgul, trolls? Against men who are frightened by elephants? Not even a battle, honestly, as much as I'd like to see the Romans win.
    Alea Iacta Est (The Die is Cast) - Gaius Julius Caesar
    An army of sheep led by a lion is better than an army of lions led by a sheep - Alexander the Great
    We will either find a way, or make one - Hannibal Barca

  4. #4
    D.B. Cooper's Avatar Tribunus
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    7,119

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    The Romans are no strangers to pachyderms.

    A possible battle plan:

    A barrage of onager and ballista fire to soften up the enemy lines. Orcs are numerically superior but very weak. If mumakil try to plow through then the Romans do what they did at Zama and open up the lines. Combine that with pila and ballista fire and the mumakil go down soon.

    Roman infantry and orcs engage. Engage the Easterlings at the flanks. Any approaching Nazgul risk getting shot down. Their rending cry will be a problem though.

    Trolls are trickier. They have thick armour and are very powerful.
    Last edited by D.B. Cooper; February 27, 2010 at 05:21 PM.


  5. #5

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    mordor

  6. #6

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    The Romans would win easily.

    In LOTR the men would have won easily if they had more numbers? Rome has numbers and superior equipment, training, tactics.

    Think of the look on a Nazgul's face when a balista bolt knocked it out of the sky :L

  7. #7

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    Rome. Mordor has limited Nazgul (what, 9?), and if a Rohan woman could kill the Witch-king, then a Roman woman could, too. The fell beasts they ride are vulnerable to missiles, so the main issue would be the fire-vulnerable Nazgul themselves.

    Trolls...don't they have an aversion to fire? They're pretty much elephants on two feet. Mercenary hoplites and Archer Auxilia, anyone?

    Mumakil are big elephants. If long-range archers and ballistae showered them with fire arrows, then they'd run amok behind Mordor's lines and kill a ton of Rhun and Haradrim warriors before being brought down by panicked Haradrim.

    Mordor seems to have an all-around vulnerability to fire. Take out their beasts, all you have are orcs. Since the Romans always had more soldiers than Gondor or Rohan did, they'd be able to hold their own and crush the weaker orcs. They might have a bit more trouble against Uruks from Isengard, though. But at least they wouldn't have to deal with the Balrog.
    In this day and age, there are two kinds of people: people with sticks, and people with bigger sticks.

    See my RTW commentary battles on YouTube

  8. #8
    FreeRadical's Avatar Tiro
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Underground Ghetto
    Posts
    244

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    This is a pretty fun poll. I read,watched the Lotr series twice,but that was a while back and I may need to catch up with the lore.This is very tough,but I voted Rome on this one.Isengard isn't mentioned so their Uruk-hai,and their fearsome berserkers are out of the question.Wargriders too,which would make a pretty fearsome cavalry that bites back

    Trolls are very strong and likely have tough armor,but are from my understanding severely lacking in intelligence,fairly few in number.They could possibly be taken out with pila which might puncture the Trolls armor. Oliophaunts,Mumakil,can be taken out with ballista,scorpions,or a well placed hail of pila. Orcs are very undisciplined,low morale,aversion to sunlight,among a host of other weaknesses. Black Uruks from Mordor are supposedly almost powerful, as the Uruk-Hai,and if these were added in number, may prove a real challenge to the Romans. Harad,Southron, troops have better weapons and probably better armor than the Romans,but they appear to be a well armed rabble.What seems to be the most significant threat are the Nazgul,and they would likely take a number of Romans down with them,but alas they are few in number.

    Edit:Supposedly Saruman's Uruk-Hai are stronger than any Sauron Orc, due to being half men and half Orc of the strongest of Sauron's. Debatable though apparently from looking at the various Lotr forums.I also kept thinking this was a battle not a war.Need to pay attention to OP.Anyways it would be tough.If magic is considered then the Romans would most likely lose lose.The Romans did at times made use of archer auxilia recruited from their eastern provinces depending on the need,but I think pila would have a much greater effect on the Mumakil depending how strong their hide is.
    Last edited by FreeRadical; February 27, 2010 at 11:11 PM.

    Quote Originally Posted by Carpathian Wolf
    I said, and pay attention here, that disciplined infantry throughout history has almost always defeated cavalry.
    One of the many great quotes by quite possibly one of the greatest amateur historians of all time.
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...93#post6942493

  9. #9
    Frederich Barbarossa's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland (From Kendall, Florida and proud!)
    Posts
    4,348

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    Rome dude. Rohan was numerically inferior to the orc army in minas tiris, but they pwned them with some cavalry. Romans could come up with something similar, as people said at zama.
    His highness, žežurn I, Keng of Savomyr!

  10. #10

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    Quote Originally Posted by D.B. Cooper View Post
    The city of Rome in 100AD, along with all the vitals of government and military, is transported via cosmic energy to Middle Earth, between Rohan and Gondor. But the forces of Mordor are on the move. Minas Tirith has fallen. Sauron attempts to form an alliance with this new power, but the Romans are horrified at these monsters and beheads the diplomats. Sauron declares war.

    The Witch-King commands mumakil, trolls, orcs, Harad, Southrons, and his company of Nazgul. Rome has legions, discipline, ballistas, etc.

    The hammer-stroke will far hardest on Rome! If it falls, then nothing stands between Mordor and the kingdom of Rohan. They face off on some plains. Who wins in this titanic battle?

    You stole my thread rome vs mongolia... anyone wanna back me up
    Quote Originally Posted by |Sith|Galvanized Iron View Post
    I love slavery

  11. #11
    empr guy's Avatar Praefectus
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    6,330

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    Quote Originally Posted by pharaoh01275 View Post
    You stole my thread rome vs mongolia... anyone wanna back me up
    nope


    i voted rome for the lolz although i honestly dont know. I think it would be very even.
    odi et amo quare id faciam fortasse requiris / nescio sed fieri sentio et excrucior


  12. #12
    C-Rob's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    somewhereinorneartheUS
    Posts
    3,492

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    I can't seem to think that Rom would win. Quick RS TEAM AND LOTR TEAM QUICK MAKE A MOD TO MAKE THESE TITANS BATTLE! haha

  13. #13
    leseras's Avatar Miles
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    329

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    The last I heard LOTR had magic and stuff right? And their troops are close to unlimited due to the way they produce them. If all their forces clashed in one battle yes Rome would win. But remember that this is a war and mordor can definitely outlast them. The romans would also find it hard to adjust to the new lands and there is no gurantee that Rohan would support them, maybe even attack them. Plus the nazguls dont really help either. But while we are on this topic, wouldn't it be interesting to have a LOTR total war?
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...89#post6791289 My first and epic failure AAR
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...22#post6976522 My second ongoing AAR
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [IMG][/IMG]
    God bless you! Oh wait you're an atheist? Then god DAMN YOU!

  14. #14
    {GrailKnight}'s Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,316

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    Quote Originally Posted by leseras View Post
    The last I heard LOTR had magic and stuff right? And their troops are close to unlimited due to the way they produce them. If all their forces clashed in one battle yes Rome would win. But remember that this is a war and mordor can definitely outlast them. The romans would also find it hard to adjust to the new lands and there is no gurantee that Rohan would support them, maybe even attack them. Plus the nazguls dont really help either. But while we are on this topic, wouldn't it be interesting to have a LOTR total war?
    There is.... http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showthread.php?t=325325

  15. #15
    Delta21's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Chişinău, Moldova
    Posts
    464

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    Alright...ROME wins hands down... in 100AD they probably had 3 times more population than the entire Middle-Earth...that's counting orcs and other cross-breds amongst "human population".
    Humans are obviously superior to orcs in the movie, not to talk about the mightiest army that ever marched the surface of the earth, where each legionary's potential was boosted ten fold by discipline, equipment, and great leaders(other than valiant speeches I seriously haven't seen any good strategy from the leaders of men and elves...just heroic leading by personal example...a waste of breath if you ask me). The only way Mordor wins: Sauron gets his hands on the One Ring= game over for Rome, they can't fight a god no matter how many they are or how good soldiers they can be.
    P.S.: Trolls and Nazguls and Mumaks don't really count...anything can be brought down no matter how big it is(especially with all their fears).
    P.P.S: Even in a prolongued war and Mordor's unlimited resources of orcs(they come out very slowly out of the earth, except the Witch King of Angmar, which produces insta-orcs in Cirith-Ungol....but by draining Sauron's already weakened power), Mordor will still have a hard time to make a big enough army to crush ROME, and that only if we assumed that Rome would go all defensive by default...which it wouldn't.
    Last edited by Delta21; February 27, 2010 at 09:16 PM.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    I have the need to repeat what others have said: As much as I'd like to see Rome win, the odds are well stacked against them.

    Mordor magic, that's the answer. Mordor magic in Sauron's fist!
    That concludes all discussion.

  17. #17
    D.B. Cooper's Avatar Tribunus
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    7,119

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    Let's not forget that Rome is fighting essentially monsters, has to have a poor effect on morale.


  18. #18

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    Actually the concepts of "Monsters" are more frightening to us modern day people than the Ancient Romans. You know, they used to think Celtic naked fanatics to be monsters. And the chariots too. Given time to get used to them, they crushed them all.

  19. #19
    Solid Snake's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    México
    Posts
    2,518

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    I think that the Haradrim and the men of Rhun would give Rome a run for her money in battle, meh, the Nazgul, a woman can kill them, no biggie there, and Romans also usd to bred like rabbits, it will be a close battle, however if one side has cavalry then that becomes the decisive factor to determine the victor.
    Do check my AAR "The Proud Blood of Germania"
    Formerly known as JerichoOnlyFan.
    And my other AAR: "The Black Serpent"




  20. #20
    gaius_caesar's Avatar Decanus
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Maizuru-shi, Kyōto
    Posts
    527

    Default Re: Rome vs. Mordor

    Rome! let's see how orcs can handle a little ROMAN BLOODLUST like what they did in the Romano-Jewish wars....

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •