Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Loose formation

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Loose formation

    What's the downside to being in loose formation? Is there a stat penalty, like lower morale or sth?

  2. #2
    SoulBlade's Avatar Vicarius
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    2,671

    Default Re: Loose formation

    missiles are less likely to hit your troops and in melee combat they are less-effective. thats what i remember from the advisor said back in RTW.
    Quote Originally Posted by Eastern Roman View Post
    Satan works in cunning way to keep us away of god. Sciene is the religion of Satan.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hobbes. View Post
    TWC is ruining my abilty to have an erection
    Quote Originally Posted by Point Blank View Post
    Regarding the Irish, if its between them and the Timurids:
    Irish: ran around bogs and forests munching on potatoes
    Timurids: slaughtered millions and threw empires into terror
    OK I'm not sure the Irish had potatoes in medieval times but that still doesn't tip things in their favour
    When in doubt, say - Trve Norsk Blękk Mettal


    a

    // [Last.fm][/SPOILER]
    Play Supremacy 1914, the free real-time strategy online games and the Browsergame of the Year 2009!


    [SPOILER]


    Supremacy1914 - the best MMO




    Spoiler for Dangerous stuff
    Code:
    Signature stock:  
    
    

  3. #3
    The Dutch Devil's Avatar Krakiszki the Hunter
    Content Emeritus

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,246

    Default Re: Loose formation

    Quote Originally Posted by SoulBlade View Post
    missiles are less likely to hit your troops and in melee combat they are less-effective. thats what i remember from the advisor said back in RTW.
    Yeah that's about it.

    Patronized by the glorious all knowing Legio.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Loose formation

    I'd like to know what exactly makes them less effective in battle. There are situations where it actually makes them MORE effective. Units take less damage from cavalry charges when spread out. Weak unit like archers can actually last longer in battle when engaged with dedicated melee units simply because less troopers are in contact and it takes longer for the enemy to cut them down.

    I'm curious if anyone knows the actual numbers involved, if there are any (e.g. loose formation = morale -3 or sth).

  5. #5
    Nazgūl Killer's Avatar ✡At Your Service✡
    Moderator Emeritus

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    The Holy Land - Israel
    Posts
    10,976

    Default Re: Loose formation

    Quote Originally Posted by D00d View Post
    I'd like to know what exactly makes them less effective in battle. There are situations where it actually makes them MORE effective. Units take less damage from cavalry charges when spread out. Weak unit like archers can actually last longer in battle when engaged with dedicated melee units simply because less troopers are in contact and it takes longer for the enemy to cut them down.

    I'm curious if anyone knows the actual numbers involved, if there are any (e.g. loose formation = morale -3 or sth).
    I doubt there's a morale impact, but I know that a unit in loose formation cannot charge properly, cannot withstand a cavalry charge properly - Meaning that they will not be able to FIGHT cavalry off, whilst they may be able to survive the initial charge, breaking lines will cause them to lose the battle eventually.

    Loose formation is fantastic for archers as they simply cannot handle any melee or ranged assault, yet it's terrible for any other unit. I advise you to use it sparingly and only with your ranged troops.
    Nazgul Killer's M2TW Guide
    Personal Help & Advice forum
    My view on the "Friend Zone"
    Good things come to those who wait... But better things come to those who never hesitate.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Loose formation

    I've managed to dig out this guide for good old STW. Nothing on loose formation here.

    http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/gui...un/p10_01.html

    I also kind of remember seeing a similar table for M(1)TW. Never found anything similar for M2.

  7. #7
    The Dutch Devil's Avatar Krakiszki the Hunter
    Content Emeritus

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,246

    Default Re: Loose formation

    Well when fighting in melee combat spread means that the enemy can infiltrate your ranks and flank individual soldiers. But if the ranks are closed the enemy faces a wall of metal. I don't know any numbers but I know that for a prolonged melee engagement tight formation causes less casualties.

    Patronized by the glorious all knowing Legio.

  8. #8
    Reconquistador's Avatar Miles
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    The Republic of Florence
    Posts
    373

    Default Re: Loose formation

    I have a question. Would you use Loose formation against Elephants? I mean, let's say you know elephants are about to charge your heavy inf. Even in tight formation, you're going to lose a lot of men. Would it be better to spread them out in anticipation of charging super-heavy cavalry?

    It is not titles that honor men, but men that honor titles.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Loose formation

    I still haven't found a good way to deal with elephants, but loose formation does reduce casaulties. When facing elephants, I just put my whole army in loose formation. This also makes units spread out more which in turn gives you more time while elephants run over your men.

    I am quite annoyed with the way elephants avoid friendly troops. They do run them down, but allies just get up again, while enemies die (and break).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •