Client Major Darling
He also told me to add this;
Originally Posted by Major Darling
Patron: Ducale
Client Major Darling
He also told me to add this;
Originally Posted by Major Darling
Patron: Ducale
Last edited by Каие; December 29, 2009 at 12:45 PM.
I am still investigating this member but i just need to say this.
Rome we all think your doing a great job but is it really necessary to start linking the clients names to your own profile?![]()
Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae :
Hesus 's Photo Gallery
The Writers Study|Ex-Global Moderator|Moderation Mentor| Ex - Librarian of the Scriptorium|PoTW|MAARC|ToTW
SPQR Forum Moderator
Hahaha my bad. Man I need to sleep more than 4 hours a night.
I am leaning to a no for the moment,
For the scriptorium :
The anti - plagiarism and writing competition is the work of the entire librarian team noting much to add to this. He added 1 article to the scriptorium, a bit of a low contribution for some one who is a member since August. Keeping the script clean? I didn't know we had a housekeeper.
ES and Helios :
There are some nice interviews with some of our members but i would like to see a bit more of his work in future issues of these publications.
The RPG community :
I don't really see theses games (the once in the community RPG and Coliseum) as a huge contribution so they won't tip the scales in favour of a yes vote.
Modding :
Is there any proof of this because i don't seem to find anything about this.I am the Chief Historical Researcher
His attitude seems to be oke, a friendly, willing to help other members with there questions. He definitely is going the right way with his contributions but i would like to see a bit more of him.
Going to do some more investigating but this is my opinion for now.
Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae :
Hesus 's Photo Gallery
The Writers Study|Ex-Global Moderator|Moderation Mentor| Ex - Librarian of the Scriptorium|PoTW|MAARC|ToTW
SPQR Forum Moderator
In his favor, he does have a lot of enthusiasm and really cares about the badge.
Against him, his low contributions for the Scriptorium. Also the case of impersonation and his involvement in site politics- I personally don't care much for them.
I'm on the fence with this one.
As near as I can tell the Scriptorium contributions amount to one article, as Hesus mentioned. I may be completely oblivious to something behind the scenes there, but if his fellow librarians aren't vouching for him in that respect it seems doubtful.
With the ES articles, I think his head is in the right place but the resulting content isn't anything spectacular. He's done 3 interviews and 2 RPG write-ups if I'm not mistaken. The thing with interviews is the ES has a somewhat standardized list of questions, so the bulk of the actual content is the result of the person being interviewed, not the interviewer. With the write-ups, the first one could have used direction and some grammar, the second one was a lot better in that respect and was certainly aided by the new format. It should be noted that he runs a team now for the interviews section, though this is only a recent development and I'm not sure he's involved in the canvasing of interviewees.
The Helios articles are a bit better in my opinion. I especially think that his article on 'Teachers...' is a very creative topic, and well executed in every respect. But it does remain that he's only thus far contributed to two issues, and the better articles were in the December issue. His historical fiction stories are also of good quality, and I can see that as being something he'll continue to excel at. The only thing I generally dislike about AARs and fiction, is people start them and never finish which leaves something to be desired, and something which seems to have happened with his first HF story, so sticking to 1-part stories would probably be in his best interests.
My problem with the way the Community Games section seems to be heading, is it seems like a glorified hotseat game. I don't have a problem with using TW to aid the forum rpg medium, but the level of quality and depth I remember from YATS way back when doesn't seem to be prevalent in the current games, or at least not in Kampf um Europa. He's made ~150 posts in there, and from those I looked at they're mostly just back and forth dialogue. I can appreciate the allure of a forum rpg, having run a rather complex one myself in days gone by, but I just can't see it as a contribution that members are essentially playing a hotseat game with some discussion aspects.
As I've said before, if there's a lot of managerial aspects involved, that part I can consider a contribution since it's providing for the players enjoyment. But I'm not seeing enough of that really and the KUE base seems to be notably small. I could be totally off-base, as this is not my area of expertise.
As for the mod historian business, that's something I'll consider but I expect a lot from mod historians. Being a mod leader I've gone through a bunch of historians who were sub-par and only posted pictures or cited something they found on google. True 'mod historians' like HamilcarBarca of RTR are absolute assets and I'd support Citizenship on that merit alone. I'm not really getting that vibe though, and would need to see a sample of his research if it were to be considered of substance.
Last but not least, his posts. He posts way too much. Not going to hold that against him, but it's downright impossible for me to look through them and find anything of decent length. A large number of the posts I've looked at have fit in the search box, which only allows something like 200 characters with spaces. By comparison, the post I'm currently typing as of this line has ~3,500 characters with spaces. I'm not saying more is necessarily better, but chatting is just something to do for fun. I got no problem with it, but it's not a contribution.
---
So in summation, I feel like he's a bit all over the place, but not in the jack-of-all-trades sense. He plays a lot of forum games, but ultimately it's just playing a game. We don't award members for playing a lot of hours of Total War and showing us their Steam record. On the flip side he's on the right track with the Helios articles, running his ES section, and writing Historical Fiction. He may also want to consider trying his hand in the D&D, but I don't know if that would be his element.
My advice to him would be to keep plugging away at the ES and Helios, and to look to write more articles like 'Teachers...' or 'My-Lai, My Story', which I thought were good and something to build on. It couldn't hurt to be more active in the Scriptorium either.
Gonna be a No for now unless someone can persuade me otherwise.![]()
House of Ward ~ Patron of Eothese, Mythic_Commodore, Wundai, & Saint Nicholas
Previous attempt here
Not sure he has done much more since his last attempt and still has the impersonation incident to think about.
y
Well the previous case of Impersonating was used in the previous case and he was told it was a reason to us voting no. Thus it should not be used again if he has not done it since.
On his contributions, I will go through them, I am someone who appreciates effort and if I see that effort I'll vote yes. If I see a genuine want to make TWC better I'll vote yes. If that's not what I see, with contributions not being that "impressive" I will vote no.
Well, if I, Belisarius, the Black Prince, and you all agree on something, I really don't think there can be any further discussion.
- Simetrical 2009 in reply to Ferrets54
My main thoughts: I thought his Helios articles were quite good, but I would have preferred to see more. He seems to be an amiable sort of fellow, and has a clean nose as far as moderator interactions go. The RPG element of his application really doesn't do anything for me, at least from the posts I saw it didn't really seem to be an intrinsic contribution. I'm kind of disappointed at the apparent lack of content in his posts in general as a matter of fact. I think he has potential, especially if he keeps up with writing for the Helios.
My initial thought is no, but I am more than wiling to reconsider if someone can provide a different interpretation of his contributions. Also, I can't help but think that perhaps if he dabbled in the mudpit, or Garbs fight club it might improve the overall content of his posts, but I guess that's just the debater in me thinking.
@Belisarius
I'm totally with you on not taking the impersonation thing into account this time around. If it was going to prevent him from gaining citizenship in the future, it should have been made very clear that future applications would meet with rejection for the same reason. Barring that, I don't think it should be a major consideration.
I like his enthusiasm and the fact that he is a member of both the ES and the Helios. It shows that he tries to contribute and effort is always a first step into the right direction. However, I'm not quite sure if his contributions are sufficient yet. I like his articles but I think they could sometimes be a bit more in-depth. Furthermore, he hasn't been on the Helios or ES team for that long so naturally he hasn't written a huge amount of articles.
However, I have to second Hesus's thoughts when it comes to his Scriptorium contributions. He has only submitted a single article so his contributions in that field aren't that significant. Playing RPGs is also not a real contribution in my opinion.
He also mentioned that he is a researcher for some mods but without any examples of that I can't really take it into account. Perhaps you could PM him or his patron about this, Rome?
All in all, he seems to be a pretty promising candidate and has shown that he is willing to contribute to the forum but I don't think he's there yet. Therefore, I'm currently leaning towards a no.
Last edited by Astaroth; December 30, 2009 at 10:56 AM.
I'm in agreement with most everyone on Major. He has a good attitude and apart from a regrettable incident that was already mentioned, posts in a very respectful manner. However, I don't think he has contributed enough just yet. The way things are now, he is well on his way though. If he keeps up the good work, I think he will surely pass on his next go around. I think this should be made clear to him if he fails this vote.
Learn about Byzantium! http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...Toward-Warfare
Civitate,Ex Content Writer,Ex Curator, Ex Moderator
Proud patron of Jean=A=Luc
In Patronicum sub Celsius
If he doesn't submit more of his work most of us will still have the same opinion. I think a month would be a bit to short as i am sure he will try again a month lather. Don't put it in a time frame but more in a enlargement of ES/Helios and scriptorium contributions.
Just a thought.
Horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae :
Hesus 's Photo Gallery
The Writers Study|Ex-Global Moderator|Moderation Mentor| Ex - Librarian of the Scriptorium|PoTW|MAARC|ToTW
SPQR Forum Moderator
Learn about Byzantium! http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...Toward-Warfare
Civitate,Ex Content Writer,Ex Curator, Ex Moderator
Proud patron of Jean=A=Luc
In Patronicum sub Celsius
He's a good guy, nice, fun and friendly.
And thats really the problem, much as I like him, it would never occur to me patronise him. I'm not saying he should stop being a good guy of course, but behind the nice smile, there's not much in the way of solid contribution.
The fact that he's all over the place, as someone said, doesn't really bother me. Contribution is cumulative if you like, its the total weight of it, rather than how much per project, but even with this view, there's not much solid work.
I'm leaning toward a no, I can be convinced, but I would say this for this member.
He's a member of the Script, he's a writer for the Helios, he's a writer for the ES and he's involved with the community RPGs. All this guy needs to do to get his badge is carry on contributing to all these areas and come back to us with a greater weight of achievements under his belts and he's practically guaranteed (to get my vote at least). All he needs is time. Its not enough to be a member of all these projects and teams, he has to be able to show he's actuively contributing to them, and given time, I have no doubt he will.
That said, if someone can come back to me and show that his modding work is significant, maybe that will swing the balance.
@Rome, evidence of his research I guess. Researchers have a hard bar to pass though, since most just seem to copy paste info into the fora. Valuable, yes, but doesn't involve as much work as someone who's patiently gone through a 10,000 lines of code....
Is it really necessary though? I mean will it substantially change someone's vote? Like you say prince, it's mainly a copy and paste job... it's hardly as if he claimed to make the mod all on his own or something. Meh, if the CdeC wills it, I guess I'll have to do it.
@Rome: From my point of view I wouldn't recommend it. As you have stated, I don't think any votes will be swayed by his research contributions. Now we could be terribly wrong and he could be the best thing since sliced model files, but it seems poignantly unlikely and even then I'm unsure the scope of the mods he mentioned would illicit enough research to change my mind.
The reason I say this is not to deny the applicant the chance to clarify one of his contributions, but because I'm thinking of it from if I were him and I got a message about clarifying that, then was later told it wasn't sufficient. It would perhaps feel baiting even though that wasn't the intention, or like everything I do just isn't good enough. I'd much rather we mentioned concrete examples of research as something to include in a future application, unless there are a number of Councilors who will be swayed by the presence of that evidence.
House of Ward ~ Patron of Eothese, Mythic_Commodore, Wundai, & Saint Nicholas
Precisely what I was going to say. It would give false hope... as with all indicators here, we seem to have forgiven him for the ''impersonation'' thing, but still think he should wait a while and contribute more.... it would be unnecessary hassle to give a false horizon and give the impression that his passage depends on that research.... when it actual fact it depends on his length of membership and lack of forum maturity.
Good points. I guess we should leave it at that and judge him based on the contributions that we see here.
That'd be preferable, thanks.