Re: Townhall - Curial Commentary and Chat
Originally Posted by
PikeStance
If we are being honest, we should all agree. let's look at the facts here.
- It is difficult to have any discussion that doesn't get personal.
- The level of participation is extremely low. A good voter turnout is about 13 votes.
- Judging by my "third class" reaction, it is not likely they will be any patronages forthcoming. (under 8 seems to be the accepted norm.)
- Citizenship itself is not value by new or old members.
- The institution (The Curia) isn't a place anyone wants to "propose" an idea.
- An absent owner; why should they be a class that "promotes" the site if the owner himself can't be bothered.
I might be addressing all these points not far in the future
Also, re the discussion taking place on Lordsith's Opifex proposal:
Originally Posted by
Dismounted Feudal Knight
I don't necessarily discourage awards for past deeds, but I think we can do more by looking for people who have no bling at all and are un or under recognized, vs awards for actions likely already covered by an Artifex patronage or an Opifex. But again, in this case there's plenty of subsequent material. If someone was not awarded, they should not be voted down. My preference is in terms of priority for proposals in the first place, which this case does fit given it is backed by later contributions, including now where we could use all that we can get.
I'm personally reticent to propose awards for inactive members, but I won't oppose anyone proposing some on the sole base of inactivity. Unless someone has officially retired (like Ferrets for instance), there's always a chance that they will return to be active.