from BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8419854.stm
What will be done to the ones who sent him to jail, I wonder?
｡◕‿◕｡
US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
from BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8419854.stm
What will be done to the ones who sent him to jail, I wonder?
Last edited by AqD; December 18, 2009 at 04:52 AM. Reason: mistype
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
God it doesn't bare thinking about. People on this forum would have advocated this man being hung.
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
You are the fisrt to talk about the death penalty, even though the guy wasn't sentenced to death.Originally Posted by Ferrets54
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
I am factually correct in every way. If you had an alternate meaning you ought to express it with written words. Rape and kidnapping are not capital offenses, and I don't know of many peoiple that think it should be.
Incidently I was on a jury 15 years ago and freed a man accused of a similar crime that had stronger evidence than this.
Last edited by Pontifex Maximus; December 18, 2009 at 07:50 AM.
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
Pah!
God save us.Incidently I was on a jury
Shamb Conspiracy Member
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
Good thing innocent people are never convicted in any other country besides the US. What kind of world would that be?
Who? The jury? Do you really think they should be punished?What will be done to the ones who sent him to jail, I wonder?
Last edited by s.rwitt; December 18, 2009 at 05:15 AM.
｡◕‿◕｡
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
Are they granted the right to randomly send innocent people to jail?
What's the difference? Does he suffer less?
Last edited by AqD; December 18, 2009 at 05:20 AM.
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
You're the first person to mention the US in this thread...
*takes off trousers
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
"AMERICA CONVICTS ANOTHER INNOCENT BLACK MAN"
What's new?
Praeses
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
And this is why we don't have the death penalty.
ofc it happens, hell I belive the longest serving UK prisoner to be found innocent had served 27 years, but it is also why the death penalty is such a terrible idea. (Even if at times I do feel some people just need killing, I cannot support the return of the death penalty because of cases such as this)
Last edited by justicar5; December 18, 2009 at 05:16 AM.
*takes off trousers
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
If that man was white, he probably would have never been convicted, but THIS IS AMERICA
Shamb Conspiracy Member
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
Good thing you don't have life sentances either. He wasn't on death row...And this is why we don't have the death penalty.
Praeses
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
Not in this case no, but you have to see what I mean, miscarriages of justice happen in every legal system, for many reasons, it is damn hard to bring someone back from the dead when it turns out they where the wrong person.
Shamb Conspiracy Member
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
It may just be me, but I have the strong feeling that if they thought he was innocent they wouldn't have sent him to prison. Weird right?Are they granted the right to randomly send innocent people to jail?
-----------
Did you read the article?You're the first person to mention the US in this thread...
Or the title of the thread?
Last edited by s.rwitt; December 18, 2009 at 05:29 AM.
｡◕‿◕｡
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
I don't judge people by what they think, but by what they do. All persons have evil minds if you ask me.
Yes. He felt fine with it. It's better for him anyway.
No. I just copied the same title.... Forget about him being black if you like.
Last edited by AqD; December 18, 2009 at 05:28 AM.
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
Um, why are you angry that it correctly tells readers where this happened? That's one of the most basic tasks of journalism.
*takes off trousers
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
Thats because he knows AMERICA likes to convict innocent black men
Shamb Conspiracy Member
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
It's in our constitution. Our hands are tied.
BTW: It's AMERIKKKA, Thank you.
*takes off trousers
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
your constitutution was written by slave mongerers who convicted innocent black men right from the get go. In fact, i read in Time magazine that America ws invented to make the process of convicting innocent black men more efficient.
Shamb Conspiracy Member
Re: US man freed by DNA evidence after 35 years in prison
That's what I was getting at. The "Darkie clause" made it mandatory that every black male that ever comes before a US judge must serve a minimum 20 years in a federal "pound me in the ass" prison. It's the only part of the constitution that cannot be changed by amendment.your constitutution was written by slave mongerers who convicted innocent black men right from the get go. In fact, i read in Time magazine that America ws invented to make the process of convicting innocent black men more efficient.
------------------
Ferrets?Yes. He felt fine with it. It's better for him anyway.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
