Evolutionists... Should We Bother With Them?

**Sir Winston Churchill** · December 09, 2009, 11:03 AM

This is an issue I've been thinking about for awhile.

I've seen many an intelligent, well educated people spend years and years proving theories to evolutionists just to be ignored, ridiculed and have books thrown in their faces by these hellish, dogma fueled enemies of free speech, harmony and understanding and; why?

It's quite obvious that these people are not worth the effort, coming up with such ridiculous ideas as "We used to be fish." and "The Earth was just a rock that was made after some random explosion caused by nothing." and never being able to prove even the most close to being vaguely possible of them.

I'm feeling, should men and women of sound mind bother with these people? Their ultimate goal seems to be the slow down of scientific progress anyway as it's quite obvious that they themselves don't believe the garbage that spurts from their own mouths, which they show effectively with their desperate attempts to censor criticism.

I believe that people should stop trying with these people and get back to important jobs.
I dare you to do better than God and create a complete new world by your own hands by 2060. After all, this is the most potent weapon to be used against evolutionism as the more science can't make them God the more they hate religion and creationism.

**cfmonkey45** · December 09, 2009, 11:09 AM

Originally Posted by Isaristh

This is an issue I've been thinking about for awhile.

I've seen many an intelligent, well educated people spend years and years proving theories to evolutionists just to be ignored, ridiculed and have books thrown in their faces by these hellish, dogma fueled enemies of free speech, harmony and understanding and; why?

It's quite obvious that these people are not worth the effort, coming up with such ridiculous ideas as "We used to be fish." and "The Earth was just a rock that was made after some random explosion caused by nothing." and never being able to prove even the most close to being vaguely possible of them.

I'm feeling, should men and women of sound mind bother with these people? Their ultimate goal seems to be the slow down of scientific progress anyway as it's quite obvious that they themselves don't believe the garbage that spurts from their own mouths, which they show effectively with their desperate attempts to censor criticism.

I believe that people should stop trying with these people and get back to important jobs.
I dare you to do better than God and create a complete new world by your own hands by 2060. After all, this is the most potent weapon to be used against evolutionism as the more science can't make them God the more they hate religion and creationism.

Uh... no, you have it like all wrong.

Many of the architects of the theory of Evolution were either Christians or schooled as Christians. Charles Darwin, originally schooled as a theologian, claimed to have lost his faith when he saw creatures in nature, who were created by God, devouring each other in most unpleasant ways. This ultimately caused him to question why an all-knowing, all-powerful, all-loving God created such a thing.

Moreover, it's not necessarily an anathema to most scientists to consider religion or the existence of God as a plausible explanation. They don't because there is no evidence that God exists. It is something we Christians take up on faith. Regarding your challenge, I ask you to find one ounce of non-Biblical evidence for God by the year 2100. If you can do that, Creationism can become a plausible theory.