
Originally Posted by
Humble Warrior
To me it always seemed strange to make a standalone Total war game that is so specifically pointed at one main character of the time. Other Total war games like Alexander were always add-on expansions which makes a lot more sense.
Napoleon seems too niche. I will also admit that in every total War game I played the Brits (well the Julii in RTW, can`t remember what i played in STW, but there was always a good choice). I do not believe that napoleon actually deserves a whole standalone and so soon after Empires - it`s just not logical.
If Napoleon was an EXPANSION to Empires that would make a lot more sense.
What are they going to try next? WELLINGTON Total War? I doubt it somehow.
But then again, I have my own suspicions as to why Napoleon has turned out to be the strange standalone it is so soon after ETW.