Page 45 of 145 FirstFirst ... 203536373839404142434445464748495051525354557095 ... LastLast
Results 881 to 900 of 2899

Thread: Der dreissigjährige Krieg v1.0

  1. #881
    Gigantus's Avatar I am not special - I am a limited edition.
    Patrician took an arrow to the knee spy of the council

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Goa - India
    Posts
    53,123
    Blog Entries
    35

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Updated the faction symbols and the faction map in the first post.










  2. #882

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Quote Originally Posted by MorganH. View Post
    It is often claimed that Samuel Pufendorf, the eminent seventeenth-century jurist and historian, first used the phrase 'The Thirty Years' War' to describe the series of conflicts which ravaged Europe between 1618 and 1648. That phrase certainly appears in his book, On the State of the German Empire , first published in 1667; but by then it was hardly new.

    Already in 1649 the English weekly newspaper, The Modern Intelligencer , began to publish a series of articles entitled 'An epitome of the late Thirty Years' War in Germany.

    In 1650 a similar service was provided for German readers by a pamphlet in that language entitled ‘A short chronicle of the Thirty Years' War’, which not only gave the dates and places of the major military actions but also offered a rough calculation of the losses of life and property caused by the conflict.
    Well, there’s more to it. There’s been a long discussion about whether the term „Thirty Years’ War“ was used by contemporaries. Pufendorf’s “employer” Frederick William of Brandenburg wanted him to prove that Frederick’s domestic policy was all the more amazing considering the oh so dark and bad times concerning foreign policy. Frederick’s foreign policy should be portrayed as defending Protestantism and “German freedom” by Pufendorf.

    The main proponent of the contemporary use is the German historian Konrad Repgen, who brought up some documents speaking of terms like “twenty years of war” or “thirty years of fighting”. (Though that does not prove that people saw this as a separate period of year, but just that there had been fighting going on for twenty or thirty years!)

    His main opponent was British historian Sigfried Steinberg, who claimed that there was a constant 50-year fight between the houses of Bourbon and Habsburg from 1609 (Crisis of Jülich-Kleve) to 1659 (Peace of the Pyrenees). Further does Steinberg claim that the “Thirty Years’ War” – a term he just uses for clarity’s sake! – was nothing special or extraordinary, just thirty years of a much longer period of fighting, which was grossly overexaggerated by those seeing a “Thirty Years’ War”.

    Nicola Sutherland tried to combine both schools of thought by saying that the “Thirty Years’ War” is a myth, but one that is so indestructible that it seems justified to use it nevertheless.

    Also worth mentioning is the question whether to speak of a predominantly “German” war. If you see 50 years of fighting from 1609 to 1659 there’s nothing predominantly “German” to it. But if you see thirty years of war from 1618 to 1648, that fits in nicely with the perspective of “Germany” having suffered horribly during the “Thirty Years’ War” – exactly what Frederick William wanted…

  3. #883

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Some more songs.

    Quote Originally Posted by A.J.P. Taylor
    Peaceful agreement and government by consent are possible only on the basis of ideas common to all parties; and these ideas must spring from habit and from history. Once reason is introduced, every man, every class, every nation becomes a law unto itself; and the only right which reason understands is the right of the stronger. Reason formulates universal principles and is therefore intolerant: there can be only one rational society, one rational nation, ultimately one rational man. Decisions between rival reasons can be made only by force.





    Quote Originally Posted by H.L Spieghel
    Is het niet hogelijk te verwonderen, en een recht beklaaglijke zaak, Heren, dat alhoewel onze algemene Dietse taal een onvermengde, sierlijke en verstandelijke spraak is, die zich ook zo wijd als enige talen des werelds verspreidt, en die in haar bevang veel rijken, vorstendommen en landen bevat, welke dagelijks zeer veel kloeke en hooggeleerde verstanden uitleveren, dat ze nochtans zo zwakkelijk opgeholpen en zo weinig met geleerdheid verrijkt en versiert wordt, tot een jammerlijk hinder en nadeel des volks?
    Quote Originally Posted by Miel Cools
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen,
    Oud ben maar nog niet verrot.
    Zoals oude bomen zingen,
    Voor Jan Lul of voor hun god.
    Ook een oude boom wil reizen,
    Bij een bries of bij een storm.
    Zelfs al zit zijn kruin vol luizen,
    Zelfs al zit zijn voet vol worm.
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen.

    Cò am Fear am measg ant-sluaigh,
    A mhaireas buan gu bràth?
    Chan eil sinn uileadh ach air chuart,
    Mar dhìthein buaile fàs,
    Bheir siantannan na bliadhna sìos,
    'S nach tog a' ghrian an àird.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jörg Friedrich
    When do I stop being a justified warrior? When I've killed a million bad civilians? When I've killed three million bad civilians? According to a warsimulation by the Pentagon in 1953 the entire area of Russia would've been reduced to ruins with 60 million casualties. All bad Russians. 60 million bad guys. By how many million ''bad'' casualties do I stop being a knight of justice? Isn't that the question those knights must ask themselves? If there's no-one left, and I remain as the only just one,

    Then I'm God.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis Napoleon III, Des Idees Napoleoniennes
    Governments have been established to aid society to overcome the obstacles which impede its march. Their forms have been varied according to the problems they have been called to cure, and according to character of the people they have ruled over. Their task never has been, and never will be easy, because the two contrary elements, of which our existence and the nature of society is composed, demand the employment of different means. In view of our divine essence, we need only liberty and work; in view of our mortal nature, we need for our direction a guide and a support. A government is not then, as a distinguished economist has said, a necessary ulcer; it is rather the beneficent motive power of all social organisation.


    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfgang Held
    I walked into those baracks [of Buchenwald concentrationcamp], in which there were people on the three-layered bunkbeds. But only their eyes were alive. Emaciated, skinny figures, nothing more but skin and bones. One thinks that they are dead, because they did not move. Only the eyes. I started to cry. And then one of the prisoners came, stood by me for a while, put a hand on my shoulder and said to me, something that I will never forget: ''Tränen sind denn nicht genug, mein Junge,
    Tränen sind denn nicht genug.''

    Jajem ssoref is m'n korew
    E goochem mit e wenk, e nar mit e shtomp
    Wer niks is, hot kawsones

  4. #884
    Hrobatos's Avatar Praeses
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    7,786

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Quote Originally Posted by Gigantus View Post

    +rep

  5. #885
    MorganH.'s Avatar Finis adest rerum
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    4,659

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Quote Originally Posted by toluas View Post
    Well, there’s more to it. There’s been a long discussion about whether the term „Thirty Years’ War“ was used by contemporaries. Pufendorf’s “employer” Frederick William of Brandenburg wanted him to prove that Frederick’s domestic policy was all the more amazing considering the oh so dark and bad times concerning foreign policy. Frederick’s foreign policy should be portrayed as defending Protestantism and “German freedom” by Pufendorf.

    The main proponent of the contemporary use is the German historian Konrad Repgen, who brought up some documents speaking of terms like “twenty years of war” or “thirty years of fighting”. (Though that does not prove that people saw this as a separate period of year, but just that there had been fighting going on for twenty or thirty years!)

    His main opponent was British historian Sigfried Steinberg, who claimed that there was a constant 50-year fight between the houses of Bourbon and Habsburg from 1609 (Crisis of Jülich-Kleve) to 1659 (Peace of the Pyrenees). Further does Steinberg claim that the “Thirty Years’ War” – a term he just uses for clarity’s sake! – was nothing special or extraordinary, just thirty years of a much longer period of fighting, which was grossly overexaggerated by those seeing a “Thirty Years’ War”.

    Nicola Sutherland tried to combine both schools of thought by saying that the “Thirty Years’ War” is a myth, but one that is so indestructible that it seems justified to use it nevertheless.

    Also worth mentioning is the question whether to speak of a predominantly “German” war. If you see 50 years of fighting from 1609 to 1659 there’s nothing predominantly “German” to it. But if you see thirty years of war from 1618 to 1648, that fits in nicely with the perspective of “Germany” having suffered horribly during the “Thirty Years’ War” – exactly what Frederick William wanted…
    Very interesting! Thanks toluas,+rep

  6. #886

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Long time no see, but I guess it's a good sign (less time spent on forums, more time to mod)?

  7. #887

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    wow this is a fantastic mod i cant wait!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  8. #888
    Civis
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    135

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    nice map update nice to see sweeden and parts of norway was added.

  9. #889

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    I've been waiting for a mod like this for so long now, and here it is. Thank you.

    Theres nothing that interest me as much as the Thirty Years War does - I'm studying history at the moment with 17th century warfare as my major so if you need any help, just ask.

    About music from the times I got a treat for you - if no one already posted it.

    Here you'll see examples of battlefield inspired music from the Thirty years war and more. Enjoy:


    Battlefield pieces


    Paul Hanlein - Fanfare - Batallia á 5 (Battlefield Spectacle)


    Hendrich Lübeckh - Auffzug printipal No.4
    (Battlefield Spectacle)


    Erasmus Widmann - Aller Freyen Tromettern zu Ehren (Cavalry trumpets)



    Various pieces composed during the Thirty Years War:

    Johann Staden - Plausus Noricus


    Adolphus Terserus - Quadricinium triumphale


    Jacob Praetorius - Salve decus suecorum Rex Gustave Adolphe

  10. #890
    Civis
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    135

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    hey have u any good 30 years war programms to watch... cant find any on u tube [and in english]

  11. #891
    MorganH.'s Avatar Finis adest rerum
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    4,659

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Quote Originally Posted by slaneslau View Post
    hey have u any good 30 years war programms to watch... cant find any on u tube [and in english]
    You could join this TWC social group;http://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=969

    There are a lot of videos,pictures and background information on the War gathered there.

  12. #892
    Civis
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    135

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    i already did join that group.. i left 2 posts 1 about Price Rupert of the Rhine.... seems i belong in it no more

  13. #893
    Civis
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    135

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    On 23 May 1618, three figures fluttered down from a high window of the Castle Hradshin in the heart of Prague. Landing in a convenient heap of rubbish, they escaped with their lives. Thus began the Thirty Years War.

  14. #894

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Quote Originally Posted by slaneslau View Post
    On 23 May 1618, three figures fluttered down from a high window of the Castle Hradshin in the heart of Prague. Landing in a convenient heap of rubbish, they escaped with their lives. Thus began the Thirty Years War.
    Indeed, but was it the dung heaps or the grace of the Virgin Mary that saved their lives - as the catholic side insisted...

  15. #895

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Maybe the dung of virgin mary? ;-)

  16. #896
    Civis
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    135

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    myby the castle windows were not high

  17. #897

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Quote Originally Posted by slaneslau View Post
    i already did join that group.. i left 2 posts 1 about Price Rupert of the Rhine.... seems i belong in it no more
    What do you mean by that?

  18. #898

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Quote Originally Posted by slaneslau View Post
    myby the castle windows were not high
    17 metres seems pretty high to me.

  19. #899
    Civis
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    135

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Quote Originally Posted by Maximinus Thrax View Post
    What do you mean by that?
    o sry i dident see my name.. opps

  20. #900

    Default Re: 1648 - Der dreissigjährige Krieg

    Quote Originally Posted by toluas View Post
    17 metres seems pretty high to me.
    17 metres? Are you sure? I saw that window once, and it could've barely been more than 5 metres down to the ground...
    "I came, I saw, and I didn't believe my eyes!"

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •