If it was still the Midieval Ages and there were conflict with the Ottomans and Byzantine Empire, yes I know its not historically correct, but with weopons and armour and troop quality, who would win?
If it was still the Midieval Ages and there were conflict with the Ottomans and Byzantine Empire, yes I know its not historically correct, but with weopons and armour and troop quality, who would win?
Ottomans, for sure they beat the Byzantines in history many times anyway.
I thought, that were the turks.
Ottomans and Turks were a bit different in a way.
So they still beat the Byzs.
The question is tbh stupid, and leaves a load of unanswered questions.
How numerous are the Byzantines & the Ottomans? What year is it? Where are they fighting - the Balkans, Anatolia, Africa, the Levant? How long have they been at it? What kind of equipment do their soldiers have? Have they adopted any new military doctrines? Who are their leaders?
Still Ottomans
The byzzies almost won but they accidently forgot on small, tiny gate open and the Ottomans got through. But that must be Constantinople's walls. and not just the men.
Originally Posted by Marcus Aurelius
“The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”
—Sir William Francis Butler
Creepiest post of the year?If it was still the Midieval Ages and there were conflict with the Ottomans and Byzantine Empire, yes I know its not historically correct, but with weopons and armour and troop quality, who would win?![]()
Someone close it before it erupts with spam!
In whatever way do you mean? What about numbers, technology, supplies etc.?
☻ This is a random collection of symbols. He's tired of you abusing him.
/▌\ Don't copy-paste this if you know what's good for you.
/ \
Ottomans had a gunpowder era army and were mostly known for that. So comparing is a bit ridicolous as Byzantines were still a late medieval army. And they ended at that time.
"Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves. Thus, communism, in particular, is a dogmatic abstraction; in which connection, however, I am not thinking of some imaginary and possible communism, but actually existing communism as taught by Cabet, Dézamy, Weitling, etc. This communism is itself only a special expression of the humanistic principle, an expression which is still infected by its antithesis – the private system. Hence the abolition of private property and communism are by no means identical, and it is not accidental but inevitable that communism has seen other socialist doctrines – such as those of Fourier, Proudhon, etc. – arising to confront it because it is itself only a special, one-sided realisation of the socialist principle."
Marx to A.Ruge
They would be allies.
Discussion about alternate history in Vestigia Vetustatis is all fine and dandy as long as some form of credible pretext is presented in the OP. Unfortunately this thread is in direct opposition with the previously mentioned.
Closed.
Granted Lettre de Marque by King Henry V - Spurs given by imb39
Сканија је Данска
عیسی پسر مریم گفت :' جهان است پل ، عبور بیش از آن است ، اما هیچ ساخت خانه بر آن او امیدوار است که برای یک روز ، ممکن است برای ابدیت امیدواریم ، اما ماندگار جهان اما ساعت آن را صرف در دعا و نماز برای استراحت است نهان
All of the Balkans is not worth the bones of a single Pomeranian grenadier.
Otto von Bismarck