BNP make a fair point about the middle eastern war

[Leeham991]

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20091021/...s-dba1618.html

I'm not a BNP supporter, so none of the usual pinheaded apologist about that please.


This is the part I believe is just about the best thing to come out of any political party since the start of this pointless war.

Mr Griffin said: "There is a prima facie case for charging Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, William Hague and David Cameron with waging aggressive war against Iraq... The Nuremberg War Crimes Trials set the precedent when the leaders of Nazi Germany were charged with invading other countries which represented no military threat to Germany."

[★Bandiera Rossa☭]

So? It doesn't change that they are Fascists..

[removeduser_487563287433]

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20091021/...s-dba1618.html

I'm not a BNP supporter, so none of the usual pinheaded apologist about that please.


This is the part I believe is just about the best thing to come out of any political party since the start of this pointless war.

If anybody's to be hung for being a nazi in Britain today it's to be Mr Griffin.

I might also point out that the BNP has done the same to our generals, not just our politicians;

“Along with the political leadership of Nazi Germany, the chiefs of staff of the German army, Alfred Jodl and Wilhelm Keitel, were also charged with waging aggressive war.

“Sir Richard and Sir Mike fall squarely into this bracket, and they must not think that they will escape culpability for pursuing the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,” Mr Griffin said"

So this has nothing to do with policy, and everything to do with those who have spoken out against the BNP.

[Freddie]

Any chance the we can stop all this free adversing for the BNP that's been going on in the Mudpit recently?

[mongrel]

Any chance the we can stop all this free adversing for the BNP that's been going on in the Mudpit recently?

No it is like Eastenders, bad but enjoyable.

There is more reason to prosecute Tony Blair than Nick Griffin. One person is a lunatic the other a murderer.

Agreed. I would love it if someone pulled a Pinochet on him.

[Phier]

Any chance the we can stop all this free adversing for the BNP that's been going on in the Mudpit recently?

I was told no

[wilpuri]

Any chance the we can stop all this free adversing for the BNP that's been going on in the Mudpit recently?

Call the KGB/Stasi and inform them of counter-revolutionary activity?

[Dr. Croccer]

Hypocritical and contradictory nonsense by the European Far Right directed against people who supposedly offended them.

In other news, the Pope is rumored to be Catholic.

[Leeham991]

Lol....

Now I wonder what would have happened if I'd posted this under "unconfirmed politician"

This "People are only allowed the opinion that the school system installs into manipulatable people from the age of 5" and "I support freedom of speech as long as the speaker agrees with me" stuff is a real problem that is outlined by many people who watch our pathetic country from a safe distance. And that is only because those of us here who point it out are met by the people who the problem is caused by.

[Syron]

BNP make a fair point about the middle eastern war

Heretic!!

[Denny Crane!]

There is more reason to prosecute Tony Blair than Nick Griffin. One person is a lunatic the other a murderer.

[tonymurphy1888]

There is more reason to prosecute Tony Blair than Nick Griffin. One person is a lunatic the other a murderer.

Murderer.... get a grip

[mongrel]

Murderer.... get a fukin grip

Well not directly, but he certainly facilitated an illegal war in my view. Let a court decide his guilt, I say.

[Denny Crane!]

Well not directly, but he certainly facilitated an illegal war in my view. Let a court decide his guilt, I say.

Huh funny how the rules change. Most gangland bosses are still called murderers when they've contracted killings out. Is there something about that analogy that doesn't make sense. What is that phrase; kill one person you are a murderer, kill ten and you are a serial killer, kill 10000 and you are a politician. Or something to that effect.

[tonymurphy1888]

Huh funny how the rules change. Most gangland bosses are still called murderers when they've contracted killings out. Is there something about that analogy that doesn't make sense. What is that phrase; kill one person you are a murderer, kill ten and you are a serial killer, kill 10000 and you are a politician. Or something to that effect.

You think Iraq woulden't of happend without the Brits? You think Saddam was a good guy? You think that a new (more) fair and reasonable government won't improve and possibly save the lives of the people of that part of the middle east? Tony Blair was just smarter than saddam etc. Why? Two reasons he knew how to comprimise and he knew what side to be on when it hit the fan. Oh and i'm sure that while these gangland Don's are considering who to destroy they think about the hearts and minds of the opposition, i'm sure they consider the how the workers and lackies will suffer, i'm sure the use a long term exit strategy that is a complete inconvenience to themselves, and i'm also sure they make every effort to overthrow the bosses rule's that condones women being stoned to death for being raped. Like i said get a grip.

[marcady]

the bnp are right about the middle eastern war and this is something i agree with, let them blow themselves up! why should we send and sacrifice valuable troops fighting in some god forsaken sandpit in the middle of nowhere, i would withdraw all my troops from the middel east and let them handle their own affairs, also afghanistan pose no threat to britain so theres no reason to attack them

[s.rwitt]

Any chance the we can stop all this free adversing for the BNP that's been going on in the Mudpit recently?

Why would you want to do such a thing? All it does is allow them to show everyone how ridiculous they are.

[s.rwitt]

Gangland leaders are also called extortionists when they levy taxes. It's not a good analogy.

[s.rwitt]

Actually that still works for me.

In that case we'd be forced to allow gang leaders or any other leader of an organized group to have the exact same powers as the government.

[Denny Crane!]

In that case we'd be forced to allow gang leaders or any other leader of an organized group to have the exact same powers as the government.

Well the government is a lot more polite about it. They don't kneecap me after 3 warnings. It starts with letters, then court dates and depending on what bill it is it is either armed kidnapping or they'll be even more polite and send bailiffs to steal my property and then if I refuse that they will then resort to the whole armed kidnapping again.

It might be necessary, perhaps society couldn't exist any other way, I don't really care but the fact is - is that violence is violence regardless of if you somehow manage to legitimise it. Now while you might make a case with Taxes and I really don't want to argue that point beyond the point that yes we could argue about legitimising that but it is force where it really gets interesting is this.

Lying about information about a credible threat aside from the fact that the guy morally and ethically is a god damned murderer for participating in a fake war, by the very things that do legitimise a war in a modern community he is guilty of war crimes ie. Murder. There was false intelligence used by Tony Blair and given to the British public. At least the Americans were a bit more honest and gung ho, we were given a whole bunch of 45 minute claims. Now Tony Blair has participated in this illegal war and half a million people are dead. Yes he holds some responsibility for that and yes he is a murderer.