View Poll Results: Alliances - Yay or Nay?

Voters
57. You may not vote on this poll
  • Lots of Alliances! Let things happen randomly.

    13 22.81%
  • I only make limited Alliances with select factions.

    36 63.16%
  • I randomly make alliances, but nothing specific.

    6 10.53%
  • Alliances? What are they?

    2 3.51%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 37

Thread: Alliances

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Alliances

    I find it a little odd that whenever the subject of alliances is brought up - whether in SS or something else - that most people tend to say "less is more" and to never make lots of them. To me, alliances tend to add a great deal of replayability to individual factions mainly because I don't think I've ever played the same faction with the same alliances in two games despite allying with everyone ASAP in every game.

    For example, with England I have played campaigns that worked out as:

    England and France
    England and HRE
    England and Denmark
    England and Genoa
    England and Poland
    England and Turkey

    All achieved by making alliances with every faction practical within the first few turns, and all of those campaigns played very differently.

    In my experience alliances are not things that you "get and forget" but have to be worked at - give your allies help when they need it, give them land in areas you want to expand into (especially as buffer-states), throw them some florins...

    My philosophy is to make as many alliances as possible and to just let them proceed, or crumble, as time progresses without any preconceived notions of what is going to happen.
    I'm currently playing as England, and after hammering the Scots the Pope went medieval on my ass and booted me out of the God club. Next thing I know, I have dirty foreigners landing on my shores from wierd and far-flung countries. - Sargon_of_Akkad

  2. #2

    Default Re: Alliances

    My epic Fatimid/Irish alliance owned the crap out of the crusading armies.
    let's conspire to Ignite
    the Lives of those who'd Die
    just to feel Alive
    Point Blank's RR/RC for Stainless Steel 6.2


  3. #3

    Default Re: Alliances

    I typically don't make a lot of alliances because I really hate thinking, "Damn, I wish they'd just get out of the way". Still, I agree that it's actually a lot of fun - I was playing as Scotland and was excommunicated (annoyingly) so I went over to my excommunicated buddy, Genoa, and we took over Europe. It was really quite fun.

    Yet, as the Turks, I made an alliance with the Khwarezms because I needed a buffer against the two invasions. It didn't last long when I realised I had to eliminate them to win.

  4. #4
    KittySN's Avatar Senator
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Far away from you.
    Posts
    1,467

    Default Re: Alliances

    I make few alliances because I hate breaking them and it messes with your reputation. Usually I'll go with a key neighbor I won't attack and the Papal States plus Knights Templar or Kingdom of Jerusalem if Catholic.

  5. #5
    RomanGuy's Avatar Tiro
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Oregon, USA
    Posts
    215

    Default Re: Alliances

    I usually don't make alliances because they'll probably betray me eventually. Allies don't help in my wars either, so what is the point of alliances anway?
    "Veni, vidi, vici"
    "I came, I saw, I conquered"
    -Gaius Julius Caesar

  6. #6
    King Siegfried's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Savannah, GA
    Posts
    474

    Default Re: Alliances

    I use alliances (especially marriage alliances) to essentially act as a buffer to protect myself. When playing a faction, I'll automatically keep in mind the factions I do NOT want to mess with and immediately seek out an alliance with them. I'll then keep the alliance strong so they never betray me, and it lets me focus on more important things - like how I'm going to win my current war.

    Creator of Kingdoms of Heaven

  7. #7
    cedric37's Avatar Why Not ?!
    Patrician Citizen

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    France
    Posts
    8,573

    Default Re: Alliances

    Quote Originally Posted by King Siegfried View Post
    I use alliances (especially marriage alliances) to essentially act as a buffer to protect myself. When playing a faction, I'll automatically keep in mind the factions I do NOT want to mess with and immediately seek out an alliance with them. I'll then keep the alliance strong so they never betray me, and it lets me focus on more important things - like how I'm going to win my current war.
    +1!! Allies should be only factions that you don't want to mess with. I used to play with only 1 (max 2) allies and it worked very well, also i did not care about my rep and was at war with lots of factions, but at least i had 1-2 borders safe so i could focus on other fronts. Recently i tended to make too many alliances due to outstanding rep and me lacking the will to say "no". Result was very bad! Let say "Too many alliances kill the alliances". Now, i am back to what i used to do: 1-2 max alliances (1 with the pope is neraly mandatory and not count in), if possible reinforced by marriages, but i still watch after my rep though.
    Patronized by y2day/Patron of KDK, Swagger & Navajo Joe, of the Imperial House of Hader



  8. #8

    Default Re: Alliances

    I make allies as well. Playing as TO, allied with HRE to help out with Poland who was vassled and then allied with Norway as well to take care of the Danes which they did vasseling them as well. Now both are helping take out Novgorod.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Alliances

    I prefer allying with the underdog factions and then aiding them in their petty wars such as in my Polish game where I'm aiding a weak Kievan Rus as they attempt to take the central part of asia minor (failing sadly). By aid I mean I actually have granted them 2 regions I siezed in a blitzkrieg attack I made on central asia minor, as well as payment for support against the turks, ontop of me sending my armies in to beat by the turkish advance.

    Alliances are only good really when your ally becomes a buffer, like the templars in my polish game act as a wall against the egyptian/fatamid menace for my crusader states, or when your fighting a common enemy, kevian rus and me both are odds with the turks for example so our armies have often fought the turkish horde together (pardon me if the horde comment is offensive, its just the turks in my game have been using horde tactics in the sense that all the armies I have fought of theirs have been composed of mostly masses of spear and militia infantry with 5-6 archer regiments that they just send charging at me). Then again the AI still tends to be idiots and stingy when it comes down to fighting beside me, often their troops charging ahead into the fray with their 300-500 man army that they call military aid.

    Vassals I actually prefer more, its like an alliance but your ally is less likely to back stab you (as long as you work on improving your relations after they accept vassalhood, the byz as my vassals arn't to keen with it yet) and the fact your incharge of defending said vassal adds to the challenge of the game. Who doesn't like extra income anyway? =)
    "Only a Bohemian can overcome a Bohemian"- Sigismund


  10. #10

    Default Re: Alliances

    Alliances are great! I usually ally with many factions as possible but not with the historical enemies: As Byzantium, I don't ally with Turks, Hungarians or Venice... etc. I still want to fight, otherwise I need wait ages for someone to attack me. With strong allies, you get better reputation and relations and in SS allies rarely betray you.

  11. #11
    koultouras's Avatar Πέος
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Greece / Thessaloniki
    Posts
    3,711

    Default Re: Alliances

    As ERE(Byzantium) i always tend to make alliances with the Orthodox Christianity Factions (K.Russ/Russia) ....Besides that an alliance with Hungary allways
    helps me to focus on my eastern borders and not on the north....


  12. #12
    Radiso-FIN's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,538

    Default Re: Alliances

    I try to make as many alliances as possible, especially if I'm playing as larger faction (HRE, Byzantines).
    I don't want to start waging war early in the game, but peacefully improve economy and build higher quality armies.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Alliances

    I'm trying to make historicaly accurate alliances. In my current polish campaign i have alliances with hungary and lithuania cause Poland had generally good relationship with these countries througtout the ages. Teutons or Russians - no way. They can only be my wassals .

  14. #14

    Default Re: Alliances

    As the Eastern Romans I've an alliance with the Seljuks because I wanted to conquer Rome and Europe again and let the Islam factions deal with eachother. I sent priests and spys to neighbour cities of the Seljuks which cause them to rebel and then I take it. Works great

  15. #15

    Default Re: Alliances

    I always forget not to ally with people I'm planning to attack. I mean, as Novgorod, I allied with Norway, Denmark, the Cumans, Lithuania and the Holy Roman Empire! Well... At least they attack each other so the alliances end
    ...ceterum autem censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.

  16. #16

    Default Re: Alliances

    What is this 'alliance' you speak of?

    A new siege weapon?
    A HUGE fan of the Stainless Steel mod for m2 kingdoms. Thank you to all the modders!

  17. #17
    Double A's Avatar person man
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Northern Cackalackistan
    Posts
    23,338

    Default Re: Alliances

    The HRE make an excellent buffer, no matter who you are!
    Jon had taken Donal and Benjen’s advice to heart: Sam may be fat and pathetic, but he is still a member of the watch, and one of the few black brothers who isn't a rapist or thief. (out of context, this sounds ridiculously racist)
    super awesome music thing | political profile
    GSTK member - Join today! (We're restarting. Again.)

  18. #18
    Lemming69's Avatar Semisalis
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Britain
    Posts
    400

    Default Re: Alliances

    i usually ally with the factions which surround the factions which border me- that way you could create a 2 front war for the enemy

  19. #19
    Mega Tortas de Bodemloze's Avatar Do it now.
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Fort Hood, Texas/Parramatta, New South Wales, Bristol, Tennessee
    Posts
    11,527

    Default Re: Alliances

    I seek alliances based on the current campaign and looking for ....

    1. The keep me alive alliances - example immediately with the Turks when playing the Templars. Buys you enough time to deal with the Egyptians. K-
    shah comes to eat every one around turn 40-50 anyway.

    2. I'm gonna eat you later alliance - England to France so you can save the good stuff {up graded units & battles} for last.

    3. Convenience - Such as any catholic faction with the Pope.

    I always try and make sure that i don't ally with to factions I know will go to war. Such As the Moors allying with the three other Iberian factions. Keep making alliances cuz everything campaign differs somewhat...

  20. #20
    Tyrenia's Avatar Tiro
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    255

    Default Re: Alliances

    At the beginning, I will ally with all the factions that surround me, save the one or two that I plan on taking down first. In order to preserve my rep, I ally with the enemies of my next target, and wait for them to declare war on each other. Then I can break my alliance with my target without a rep loss.
    "It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything"
    -Tyler Durden (Fight Club)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •