Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Hearts of Iron II or III?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Hearts of Iron II or III?

    I've never played a Hearts of Iron game before but I'm really interested in getting one after playing EU3, the thing is, I've heard that HOI3 is unplayable and all this stuff about buggy events and Stalingrand being in the Causcaus, while I've only heard good things about HOI2. So is it worth getting HOI2 + expansions now and HOI3 later, or do you reckon that HOI3 will become playable in the near future so getting HOI2 now isn't worth it?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    HoI 2 armageddon is hella good... if you go to stonyroad.de

  3. #3
    NONOPUST's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,165

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    Never played HOI2, but am playing HOI3. Imo it's a good game albeit needing a little bit of polish(within a month a big patch is coming). It's not as bad as everyone says. Up to you of course.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    Big patch within a month? Hmmmm I'm still playing EU3 right now so I can guess I can wait. Are there any major gameplay or timeline differences between the two?

  5. #5

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    3 looks better and is more accessible but 2 has way more depth

    Proud creator of the original describe the person above you thread in '09.
    Also proud ragequitter.


  6. #6
    Town Watch's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Helsinki
    Posts
    2,235

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    hearts of iron doomsday + armageddon expansion pack was a very good game I think, and there are lots of mods for that game, I would recommend buying it since it's not that expensive.

    In any case, if you decide not to buy the normal doomsday + armageddon, then I would recommend waiting for a while, until Paradox interactive releases the "arsenal of democracy" Hearts of Iron game.

    It was made by some former HoI2 modders who got a license from P-dox interactive to the hearts of iron 2 game engine. It's basically a buffed up version of hearts of iron doomsday + armageddon with lots of new gameplay features that were unavailable for modders in the past. However I suspect that there isn't going to be any mod compatibility with THAT game, and no one is probably going to do any mods for that game either, everyone's playing/modding HoI3 now.

    Ultimately it's up to you of course, how you're gonna spend your money, but I would definitely buy the normal HoI doomsday+ armageddon just because of the excellent mods that were done for that game.

    HoI3, as far as I know (haven't touched that game for a while), is still in a very buggy state at the moment. There's the weather bug for instance, its raining all the time in the sea provinces which makes it impossible to use carriers in the game at the moment.

    A.I. is pretty stupid all around in any case, Soviet Union in A.I. hands is incredibly weak, A.I doesn't defend it's borders most of the time, and doesn't use strategical reserve forces/second lines of defence either, and does crazy stuff, A.I doesn't mobilize properly which means it fights for ages with weak reserve units etc... The laws that provide bonuses once enacted are also pretty botched at the moment, soviet union has massive officer shortages and it cannot enact any kind of draft laws in time for the german invasion.

    There's also no incentive to use volunteer army law for example, all the laws simply proceed from the worst to the best, with the democracies having the worst laws in the beginning and slowly get towards the best drafting laws, where as for the Germans for instance its much easier and faster to get the best draft laws...

    So the law system is pretty boring once you figure out that its really that simple. It's basically just a replacement for the old slider system of HoI2, except that now ALL the sliders have simply one best alternative.

    Where as in HoI2 free market slider was better economically, but centrally planned economy always had more transport capacity as an advantage over free market. In similar fashion in HoI2, Soviet Union benefitted from having drafted army because you could take advantage of the serial production of infantry divisions and big manpower pool, but there's also the drawback of less organization and starting experience for units, than what a standing army would have.

    The game was also incredibly laggy in the first patches, on some pretty good rigs I might add! You might wanna try out the free demo before bying hoi3, to see how well it runs
    "What do I feel when I kill my enemy?"
    -Recoil-

  7. #7
    hellheaven1987's Avatar Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Hell called Conscription
    Posts
    35,615

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    Quote Originally Posted by Town Watch View Post
    A.I. is pretty stupid all around in any case, Soviet Union in A.I. hands is incredibly weak, A.I doesn't defend it's borders most of the time, and doesn't use strategical reserve forces/second lines of defence either, and does crazy stuff, A.I doesn't mobilize properly which means it fights for ages with weak reserve units etc... The laws that provide bonuses once enacted are also pretty botched at the moment, soviet union has massive officer shortages and it cannot enact any kind of draft laws in time for the german invasion.

    There's also no incentive to use volunteer army law for example, all the laws simply proceed from the worst to the best, with the democracies having the worst laws in the beginning and slowly get towards the best drafting laws, where as for the Germans for instance its much easier and faster to get the best draft laws...

    So the law system is pretty boring once you figure out that its really that simple. It's basically just a replacement for the old slider system of HoI2, except that now ALL the sliders have simply one best alternative.

    Where as in HoI2 free market slider was better economically, but centrally planned economy always had more transport capacity as an advantage over free market. In similar fashion in HoI2, Soviet Union benefitted from having drafted army because you could take advantage of the serial production of infantry divisions and big manpower pool, but there's also the drawback of less organization and starting experience for units, than what a standing army would have.

    The game was also incredibly laggy in the first patches, on some pretty good rigs I might add! You might wanna try out the free demo before bying hoi3, to see how well it runs
    1. Soviet should always rely on standard army, with a standard army Soviet never really needs to build officers at all (200% even with 70 divisions); the problem is AI generally does not disband units, hence AI Soviet generally uses that crappy reserve army.

    2. Free Market, in HoI2, is benefit by quickly building units; Central Planning generally takes too long to build units, even with that extra IC. If possible, go Free Market without any doubt, even sometimes it may take longer to get that for facist countries (for Stalinist countries it is adviced not doing Free Market).
    Quote Originally Posted by Markas View Post
    Hellheaven, sometimes you remind me of King Canute trying to hold back the tide, except without the winning parable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diocle View Post
    Cameron is midway between Black Rage and .. European Union ..

  8. #8

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    I have both, I don't like HOI3 it is ugly, slow and I hate the new research system, I would defo get Hoi2 with expansions

  9. #9
    Sharpe's Company's Avatar Campidoctor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Stoke-on-Trent
    Posts
    1,717

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ojf View Post
    I have both, I don't like HOI3 it is ugly, slow and I hate the new research system, I would defo get Hoi2 with expansions
    Thanks for the advise.

    Just from reading about it and looking at Pictures it looks as if it's ugly and the new research system from what I heard sounds quite stupid.

    Oh Well stick to Doomsday i suppose
    Justice 4 Charlene
    #MoggMania
    #No2EU

  10. #10

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharpe's Company View Post
    Thanks for the advise.

    Just from reading about it and looking at Pictures it looks as if it's ugly and the new research system from what I heard sounds quite stupid.

    Oh Well stick to Doomsday i suppose
    II+expansions is definetly better than III as of yet. When III gets faster it will probably be better though
    Have you ever seen Dirty Harry Guns and money are best diplomacy
    "At a football club, there's a holy trinity - the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don't come into it. They are only there to sign the cheques."

    Bill Shankly

    "Not badly, considering I was seated between Jesus Christ and Napoleon"

    David Lloyd George was pleased with his performance at Versailles.

  11. #11

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    Hoi3 is simply a broken mess that needs at least another year in development before it is playable. Why Paradox released it in its current state is beyond me.

    Get HOI2 and its overpriced DLC's instead.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    Haven't played III yet but it looks and sounds inferior.
    Quote Originally Posted by A.J.P. Taylor
    Peaceful agreement and government by consent are possible only on the basis of ideas common to all parties; and these ideas must spring from habit and from history. Once reason is introduced, every man, every class, every nation becomes a law unto itself; and the only right which reason understands is the right of the stronger. Reason formulates universal principles and is therefore intolerant: there can be only one rational society, one rational nation, ultimately one rational man. Decisions between rival reasons can be made only by force.





    Quote Originally Posted by H.L Spieghel
    Is het niet hogelijk te verwonderen, en een recht beklaaglijke zaak, Heren, dat alhoewel onze algemene Dietse taal een onvermengde, sierlijke en verstandelijke spraak is, die zich ook zo wijd als enige talen des werelds verspreidt, en die in haar bevang veel rijken, vorstendommen en landen bevat, welke dagelijks zeer veel kloeke en hooggeleerde verstanden uitleveren, dat ze nochtans zo zwakkelijk opgeholpen en zo weinig met geleerdheid verrijkt en versiert wordt, tot een jammerlijk hinder en nadeel des volks?
    Quote Originally Posted by Miel Cools
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen,
    Oud ben maar nog niet verrot.
    Zoals oude bomen zingen,
    Voor Jan Lul of voor hun god.
    Ook een oude boom wil reizen,
    Bij een bries of bij een storm.
    Zelfs al zit zijn kruin vol luizen,
    Zelfs al zit zijn voet vol worm.
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen.

    Cò am Fear am measg ant-sluaigh,
    A mhaireas buan gu bràth?
    Chan eil sinn uileadh ach air chuart,
    Mar dhìthein buaile fàs,
    Bheir siantannan na bliadhna sìos,
    'S nach tog a' ghrian an àird.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jörg Friedrich
    When do I stop being a justified warrior? When I've killed a million bad civilians? When I've killed three million bad civilians? According to a warsimulation by the Pentagon in 1953 the entire area of Russia would've been reduced to ruins with 60 million casualties. All bad Russians. 60 million bad guys. By how many million ''bad'' casualties do I stop being a knight of justice? Isn't that the question those knights must ask themselves? If there's no-one left, and I remain as the only just one,

    Then I'm God.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis Napoleon III, Des Idees Napoleoniennes
    Governments have been established to aid society to overcome the obstacles which impede its march. Their forms have been varied according to the problems they have been called to cure, and according to character of the people they have ruled over. Their task never has been, and never will be easy, because the two contrary elements, of which our existence and the nature of society is composed, demand the employment of different means. In view of our divine essence, we need only liberty and work; in view of our mortal nature, we need for our direction a guide and a support. A government is not then, as a distinguished economist has said, a necessary ulcer; it is rather the beneficent motive power of all social organisation.


    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfgang Held
    I walked into those baracks [of Buchenwald concentrationcamp], in which there were people on the three-layered bunkbeds. But only their eyes were alive. Emaciated, skinny figures, nothing more but skin and bones. One thinks that they are dead, because they did not move. Only the eyes. I started to cry. And then one of the prisoners came, stood by me for a while, put a hand on my shoulder and said to me, something that I will never forget: ''Tränen sind denn nicht genug, mein Junge,
    Tränen sind denn nicht genug.''

    Jajem ssoref is m'n korew
    E goochem mit e wenk, e nar mit e shtomp
    Wer niks is, hot kawsones

  13. #13
    magpie's Avatar Artifex
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Ireland,Co Kilkenny
    Posts
    10,179

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    I would recommend HOI2+armageddon. I gave up on III lag, lag and more lag, bugs ect, game will never run right on a modern comp, as it only uses 1 core, if you have an old p4 3.6 ghz single core you will get better performance than with multicore.

    sponsered by the noble Prisca

  14. #14
    hellheaven1987's Avatar Comes Domesticorum
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Hell called Conscription
    Posts
    35,615

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    Quote Originally Posted by magpie View Post
    I would recommend HOI2+armageddon. I gave up on III lag, lag and more lag, bugs ect, game will never run right on a modern comp, as it only uses 1 core, if you have an old p4 3.6 ghz single core you will get better performance than with multicore.
    Well, the new patch fix most stuff.
    Quote Originally Posted by Markas View Post
    Hellheaven, sometimes you remind me of King Canute trying to hold back the tide, except without the winning parable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Diocle View Post
    Cameron is midway between Black Rage and .. European Union ..

  15. #15
    Campidoctor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    1,593

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    If you're going to get 2 wait a week or so and get Arsenal of Democracy.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arsenal...8video_game%29

    III is good, but it's not where it needs to be yet. Give it some time and an expansion or two and enjoy AoD in the meantime.

  16. #16
    Frederich Barbarossa's Avatar Protector Domesticus
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Edinburgh, Scotland (From Kendall, Florida and proud!)
    Posts
    4,348

    Default Re: Hearts of Iron II or III?

    I personally like 3
    His highness, þeþurn I, Keng of Savomyr!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •