Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

    hey all
    i have some questions about gun's
    who in inveted it
    and were it was first used
    and did Mehmed II used it on his Conquest of Constantinople
    and thank's

  2. #2

    Default Re: gun's

    Chinese invented gunpowder guns, it is not exactly known when, but:

    The first documented battlefield use of gunpowder artillery took place on January 28, 1132, when Song General Han Shizhong used huochong to capture a city in Fujian.

    And (first Muslim cannons in Europe):

    The first confirmed use of gunpowder in Europe was the Moorish cannon, first used by the Andalusians in the Iberian Peninsula, at the siege of Seville in 1248, and the siege of Niebla in 1262.

    They were also used during the battle of Ain Jalut in 1260.

    And the first confirmed use of Christian cannon in Europe comes from 1326 - it was in Italy.
    Last edited by Domen123; September 21, 2009 at 10:37 AM.

  3. #3
    clandestino's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia/Hell
    Posts
    3,374

    Default Re: gun's

    Yes Mehmed used canons in the siege of the Constantinople, they were made by Hungarian canon maker Urban and one of them was the biggest cannon of it's time, it had range of whole mile and it was pul by 60 oxen and it's cannonballs were heavy 12 cents ( I don't know how much cent weights ).
    join the light side of the Force: Kosovo is Serbia
    Fight for the creation of new Serbian Empire


    == BARBAROGENIVS DECIVILISATOR ==










  4. #4
    clandestino's Avatar Primicerius
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia/Hell
    Posts
    3,374

    Default Re: gun's

    If you read couple of posts before you would find:
    Quote Originally Posted by clandestino View Post
    Yes Mehmed used canons in the siege of the Constantinople, they were made by Hungarian canon maker Urban and one of them was the biggest cannon of it's time, it had range of whole mile and it was pul by 60 oxen and it's cannonballs were heavy 12 cents ( I don't know how much cent weights ).
    join the light side of the Force: Kosovo is Serbia
    Fight for the creation of new Serbian Empire


    == BARBAROGENIVS DECIVILISATOR ==










  5. #5

    Default Re: gun's

    The Russians invented the first assault rifle and the first to equip them to army units.

  6. #6
    Nikos's Avatar VENGEANCE BURNS
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    12,216

    Default Re: gun's

    Quote Originally Posted by Cposi_I_Caxponi View Post
    The Russians invented the first assault rifle and the first to equip them to army units.
    Incorrect, Germany invented the first assault rifle, the MP44 (or Sturmgewher). Consequently, the Germans were also the first to issue them to military units.
    Learn about Byzantium! http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...Toward-Warfare
    Civitate
    ,Ex Content Writer,Ex Curator, Ex Moderator

    Proud patron of Jean=A=Luc
    In Patronicum sub Celsius


  7. #7
    Atterdag's Avatar Tro og Håb
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In the Valley of the Wind
    Posts
    6,691

    Default Re: Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

    Changed title to actually reflect the topic.
    Granted Lettre de Marque by King Henry V - Spurs given by imb39
    Сканија је Данска

    عیسی پسر مریم گفت :' جهان است پل ، عبور بیش از آن است ، اما هیچ ساخت خانه بر آن او امیدوار است که برای یک روز ، ممکن است برای ابدیت امیدواریم ، اما ماندگار جهان اما ساعت آن را صرف در دعا و نماز برای استراحت است نهان

    All of the Balkans is not worth the bones of a single Pomeranian grenadier.
    Otto von Bismarck


  8. #8

    Default Re: gun's

    Quote Originally Posted by Nikos View Post
    Incorrect, Germany invented the first assault rifle, the MP44 (or Sturmgewher). Consequently, the Germans were also the first to issue them to military units.

    Not at all, the Automatic Federov was developed during WWI and although it did not meet every standard as an assault rifle (medium-sized cartridge), it was light-weight and had selective-fire capability.

  9. #9
    Nikos's Avatar VENGEANCE BURNS
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    12,216

    Default Re: gun's

    Quote Originally Posted by Cposi_I_Caxponi View Post
    Not at all, the Automatic Federov was developed during WWI and although it did not meet every standard as an assault rifle (medium-sized cartridge), it was light-weight and had selective-fire capability.
    Sigh, Assault rifles are rifles with Medium sized Cartridges with selective fire capabilities, rifles with large cartridges are called battle rifles, regardless of their size or firing capabilities.
    Learn about Byzantium! http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...Toward-Warfare
    Civitate
    ,Ex Content Writer,Ex Curator, Ex Moderator

    Proud patron of Jean=A=Luc
    In Patronicum sub Celsius


  10. #10

    Default Re: gun's

    missuse of apostrophe.


    Anyway, guns were first invented by the chinese. then they made rockets. then europeans copied guns. then in 1944 the germans invented the first "modern" assault rifle, the STG-44/MP-44.

    Proud creator of the original describe the person above you thread in '09.
    Also proud ragequitter.


  11. #11

    Default Re: Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

    depends on what type of "guns". Early artillery was by the Chinese but rifles were by europeans much later.
    Have a question about China? Get your answer here.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

    thank's guys for the help
    but did Mehmed II army used rifles not cannon's on his Conquest of Constantinople
    Last edited by ALFAJI; September 22, 2009 at 12:16 AM.

  13. #13

    Default Re: Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

    Quote Originally Posted by ALFAJI View Post
    thank's guys for the help
    but did Mehmed II army used rifles not cannon's on his Conquest of Constantinople

    He used the biggest cannon ever known in that time. Constantinople's main defense was not its soldiers but it was its walls. Mehmed II needed something to break those walls and he used is canons to do it. Im not sure if his Janissary used rifles but a think they did.
    http://e-sim.org/lan.126366/

    Je t'aime ma petite chou!

  14. #14

    Default Re: Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

    Quote Originally Posted by Xellos_Moon View Post
    Im not sure if his Janissary used rifles but a think they did.
    rifles ? you probably mean muskets

  15. #15

    Default Re: Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

    Quote Originally Posted by garudamon11 View Post
    rifles ? you probably mean muskets
    ya musket hand gunners

  16. #16

    Default Re: Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

    Quote Originally Posted by garudamon11 View Post
    rifles ? you probably mean muskets
    tomato tomato
    http://e-sim.org/lan.126366/

    Je t'aime ma petite chou!

  17. #17
    RollingWave's Avatar Praepositus
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    5,083

    Default Re: Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

    the problem is, guns and cannons were the same thing in the begining, and it's hard to find a exact point where a handcannon turned into a real gun.

    most would probably point to the early Ming dynasty which was founded in 1368.

    and no, "rifle" is a term that only applies to guns after the late 19th century. so ww1 guns were rifles. but most of the guns in the Napoleon wars were still muskets. the earliest true guns in mass use is generally the arquebus.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

    Quote Originally Posted by RollingWave View Post
    the problem is, guns and cannons were the same thing in the begining, and it's hard to find a exact point where a handcannon turned into a real gun.

    most would probably point to the early Ming dynasty which was founded in 1368.

    and no, "rifle" is a term that only applies to guns after the late 19th century. so ww1 guns were rifles. but most of the guns in the Napoleon wars were still muskets. the earliest true guns in mass use is generally the arquebus.
    i think hand-held version of guns by mongols might be earliest form of guns (versus cannons) isn't?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Yuan_chinese_gun.jpg
    Have a question about China? Get your answer here.

  19. #19
    cenkiss's Avatar Domesticus
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Turkiye
    Posts
    2,487

    Default Re: Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

    Yes.Janissaries unsed guns.

  20. #20

    Default Re: Questions Regarding the Origin of Guns

    The first ''gun'' would be the firelance, a Chinese/Asian weapon used in the early middle ages which was essentially a spear with a large firecracker and a projectile. The firecracker would be lit, and the explosion would launch the projectile, confusing and perhaps harming the foe, which allowed the troops to advanced with the spears on the weakened enemies.
    Quote Originally Posted by A.J.P. Taylor
    Peaceful agreement and government by consent are possible only on the basis of ideas common to all parties; and these ideas must spring from habit and from history. Once reason is introduced, every man, every class, every nation becomes a law unto itself; and the only right which reason understands is the right of the stronger. Reason formulates universal principles and is therefore intolerant: there can be only one rational society, one rational nation, ultimately one rational man. Decisions between rival reasons can be made only by force.





    Quote Originally Posted by H.L Spieghel
    Is het niet hogelijk te verwonderen, en een recht beklaaglijke zaak, Heren, dat alhoewel onze algemene Dietse taal een onvermengde, sierlijke en verstandelijke spraak is, die zich ook zo wijd als enige talen des werelds verspreidt, en die in haar bevang veel rijken, vorstendommen en landen bevat, welke dagelijks zeer veel kloeke en hooggeleerde verstanden uitleveren, dat ze nochtans zo zwakkelijk opgeholpen en zo weinig met geleerdheid verrijkt en versiert wordt, tot een jammerlijk hinder en nadeel des volks?
    Quote Originally Posted by Miel Cools
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen,
    Oud ben maar nog niet verrot.
    Zoals oude bomen zingen,
    Voor Jan Lul of voor hun god.
    Ook een oude boom wil reizen,
    Bij een bries of bij een storm.
    Zelfs al zit zijn kruin vol luizen,
    Zelfs al zit zijn voet vol worm.
    Als ik oud ben wil ik zingen.

    Cò am Fear am measg ant-sluaigh,
    A mhaireas buan gu bràth?
    Chan eil sinn uileadh ach air chuart,
    Mar dhìthein buaile fàs,
    Bheir siantannan na bliadhna sìos,
    'S nach tog a' ghrian an àird.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jörg Friedrich
    When do I stop being a justified warrior? When I've killed a million bad civilians? When I've killed three million bad civilians? According to a warsimulation by the Pentagon in 1953 the entire area of Russia would've been reduced to ruins with 60 million casualties. All bad Russians. 60 million bad guys. By how many million ''bad'' casualties do I stop being a knight of justice? Isn't that the question those knights must ask themselves? If there's no-one left, and I remain as the only just one,

    Then I'm God.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis Napoleon III, Des Idees Napoleoniennes
    Governments have been established to aid society to overcome the obstacles which impede its march. Their forms have been varied according to the problems they have been called to cure, and according to character of the people they have ruled over. Their task never has been, and never will be easy, because the two contrary elements, of which our existence and the nature of society is composed, demand the employment of different means. In view of our divine essence, we need only liberty and work; in view of our mortal nature, we need for our direction a guide and a support. A government is not then, as a distinguished economist has said, a necessary ulcer; it is rather the beneficent motive power of all social organisation.


    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfgang Held
    I walked into those baracks [of Buchenwald concentrationcamp], in which there were people on the three-layered bunkbeds. But only their eyes were alive. Emaciated, skinny figures, nothing more but skin and bones. One thinks that they are dead, because they did not move. Only the eyes. I started to cry. And then one of the prisoners came, stood by me for a while, put a hand on my shoulder and said to me, something that I will never forget: ''Tränen sind denn nicht genug, mein Junge,
    Tränen sind denn nicht genug.''

    Jajem ssoref is m'n korew
    E goochem mit e wenk, e nar mit e shtomp
    Wer niks is, hot kawsones

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •