Answer Yes or No with some explanations
Answer Yes or No with some explanations
A retarded monkey could beat Ahmadinejad in a debate. So... yes.
Sure I've been called a xenophobe, but the truth is Im not. I honestly feel that America is the best country and all other countries aren't as good. That used to be called patriotism.
That's really going to depend on who is doing the judging.
Depends on what, I couldnt beat him on a debate on Islam , Or a debate on patriotism.
I could probably beat him on a debate relating to pragmatic policies or sensible use of power.
Country's and organisations who can beat president President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad In A Debate: UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, Foreign Minister of Norway Jonas Gahr Store [3], Russia's foreign ministry Sergey Viktorovich Lavrov, Brazil's foreign ministry Chancellor Celso Amorim [4] and Barack Obama [1],
The (timid) Countrys who can not beat president President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad In A Debate: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic(specially), Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, St. Kitts and Nevis and the United Kingdom.[78] And former president George W. Bush [2].
EDIT: If I get Ahmadinejad in Garbarsardar's Fight Club , then hell yeah!
Last edited by Kjertesvein; September 06, 2009 at 02:31 AM.
Thorolf was thus armed. Then Thorolf became so furious that he cast his shield on his back, and, grasping his halberd with both hands, bounded forward dealing cut and thrust on either side. Men sprang away from him both ways, but he slew many. Thus he cleared the way forward to earl Hring's standard, and then nothing could stop him. He slew the man who bore the earl's standard, and cut down the standard-pole. After that he lunged with his halberd at the earl's breast, driving it right through mail and body, so that it came out at the shoulders; and he lifted him up on the halberd over his head, and planted the butt-end in the ground. There on the weapon the earl breathed out his life in sight of all, both friends and foes. [...] 53, Egil's Saga- The pranks played on the knight Jean de Joinville, 1249, 7th crusade.I must tell you here of some amusing tricks the Comte d'Eu played on us. I had made a sort of house for myself in which my knights and I used to eat, sitting so as to get the light from the door, which, as it happened, faced the Comte d'Eu's quarters. The count, who was a very ingenious fellow, had rigged up a miniature ballistic machine with which he could throw stones into my tent. He would watch us as we were having our meal, adjust his machine to suit the length of our table, and then let fly at us, breaking our pots and glasses.
http://imgur.com/a/DMm19
Last edited by Babur; September 06, 2009 at 05:38 AM.
just a useless effort of insulting a leader muslim ummah loves.
and beating him in debate depends on the topic and the judge definitely.
Last edited by Babur; September 06, 2009 at 06:43 AM.
In a debate about his international politics, I think he could have destroyed anyone in this thread.
Last edited by Babur; September 06, 2009 at 07:08 AM.
How can you debate with someone who considers himself as the one who listens to others' advices about his policies, just because an 5 years-old kid has written him a letter with his own very hands and suggested him 10 ways to improve the government* (note that in Iran, kids go to school when they are 7) and sees a light halo around his head? Debating with this kind of creature is something impossible, as he's completely brainless.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrLUj2HbO7s
Doubt it. Can't speak Parsi.
![]()
morecuriousthanbold.com
how do people go to sleep then? if he has a such a massive light halo (according to him)
that's the oldest excuse in the book
btw it's Farsi not Parsi
Parsi are the descendants of Zoroasterians who fled to India in 8th/9th Century AD
he is trying to usurp me and Spammy, imo Spammy is the authentic voice of the Ummah hereI didn't know you spoke for all of the Ummah.
I think in his case bullets would be a better way to debate![]()
Last edited by Babur; September 06, 2009 at 10:24 AM.
An honest debater acknowledges when his point has been refuted and relies on facts.
Ahmadinejad does neither and the only way to debate him is 4th grade style ridicule.
I'd recommend starting with something about his mother.
"When I die, I want to die peacefully in my sleep, like Fidel Castro, not screaming in terror, like his victims."
My shameful truth.
Thorolf was thus armed. Then Thorolf became so furious that he cast his shield on his back, and, grasping his halberd with both hands, bounded forward dealing cut and thrust on either side. Men sprang away from him both ways, but he slew many. Thus he cleared the way forward to earl Hring's standard, and then nothing could stop him. He slew the man who bore the earl's standard, and cut down the standard-pole. After that he lunged with his halberd at the earl's breast, driving it right through mail and body, so that it came out at the shoulders; and he lifted him up on the halberd over his head, and planted the butt-end in the ground. There on the weapon the earl breathed out his life in sight of all, both friends and foes. [...] 53, Egil's Saga- The pranks played on the knight Jean de Joinville, 1249, 7th crusade.I must tell you here of some amusing tricks the Comte d'Eu played on us. I had made a sort of house for myself in which my knights and I used to eat, sitting so as to get the light from the door, which, as it happened, faced the Comte d'Eu's quarters. The count, who was a very ingenious fellow, had rigged up a miniature ballistic machine with which he could throw stones into my tent. He would watch us as we were having our meal, adjust his machine to suit the length of our table, and then let fly at us, breaking our pots and glasses.
http://imgur.com/a/DMm19