What nation's people have violence associated with them most?
Germany
USA
Japan
China
Britain
France
Russia
India
Persia
Greece
Italy (inc. Roman)
Other
What nation's people have violence associated with them most?
Last edited by Rodina38; August 26, 2009 at 12:43 PM.
Еврейская гостиница в маленьком местечке. Шесть утра. Хозяин будит
спящего гостя:
- Извините, что так рано, но купец из соседнего номера хочет позавтра-
кать.
- А я-то тут при чем?
- А вы спите на нашей единственной скатерти.
English?
I check into small hotel a few kilometers from Kiev. It is late. I am tired. I tell woman at desk I want a room. She tells me room number and give key. "But one more thing comrade; there is one room without number and always lock. Don't even peek in there." I take key and go to room to sleep. Night comes and I hear trickling of water. It comes from the room across. I cannot sleep so I open door. It is coming from room with no number. I pound on door. No response. I look in keyhole. I see nothing except red. Water still trickling. I go down to front desk to complain. "By the way who is in that room?" She look at me and begin to tell story. There was woman in there. Murdered by her husband. Skin all white, except her eyes, which were red. I tell her I don't give a. Stop the water trickling or give me refund. She gave me 100 ruble credit and free breakfast. Such is life in Moscow
china, dynastic change was the most bloody affair you can imagine, it happens once every few centuries, it was the WORLD WAR for the chinese civilization back then.
Have a question about China? Get your answer here.
Puerto Rico! Just kidding, Ancient and Modern Israel, I say.![]()
A member of the Most Ancient, Puissant and Honourable Society of Silly Old Duffers
Secret Sig Content Box!
It's wrong to mingle Italy with ancient Rome.
Еврейская гостиница в маленьком местечке. Шесть утра. Хозяин будит
спящего гостя:
- Извините, что так рано, но купец из соседнего номера хочет позавтра-
кать.
- А я-то тут при чем?
- А вы спите на нашей единственной скатерти.
"Therefore I am not in favour of raising any dogmatic banner. On the contrary, we must try to help the dogmatists to clarify their propositions for themselves. Thus, communism, in particular, is a dogmatic abstraction; in which connection, however, I am not thinking of some imaginary and possible communism, but actually existing communism as taught by Cabet, Dézamy, Weitling, etc. This communism is itself only a special expression of the humanistic principle, an expression which is still infected by its antithesis the private system. Hence the abolition of private property and communism are by no means identical, and it is not accidental but inevitable that communism has seen other socialist doctrines such as those of Fourier, Proudhon, etc. arising to confront it because it is itself only a special, one-sided realisation of the socialist principle."
Marx to A.Ruge
Еврейская гостиница в маленьком местечке. Шесть утра. Хозяин будит
спящего гостя:
- Извините, что так рано, но купец из соседнего номера хочет позавтра-
кать.
- А я-то тут при чем?
- А вы спите на нашей единственной скатерти.
Romans were not an ethnicity, they were like Americans with different ethnic origins like Italics, Gauls, Iberians, Germans, North Africans, Thracians, Dacians, Syrians, Britons, Illyrians, etc. The people living in Italy were not a single ethnicity either : there were Italics (divided in Latins, Oscians, Umbrii, etc), Gauls, Etruscans, Greeks, Illyrians, and of course all sorts of immigrants from all corners of the Empire.
Roman Empire was not an Italian Empire. It was the state created by a single city, Rome, and Italy was a conquered province like Gaul or Hispania was. So the political entity that created Roman Empire was Rome not Italy; it's not like in modern times when for example you can say that the British Empire was an empire created by a country, Great Britain. Roman Empire was not conquered by a country (Italy) but by a city-state, Rome.
Italian ethnicity was created in time with the Romanisation of all peoples of Italy and only after the fall of Roman Empire and the migrations Longobards we can talk about Italians as an ethnicity distinct from other Romance ethnicities.
Your OP refers to "What nation has the most blood history?". Ignoring the fact the Italian nation appeared only in XIXth century, if we consider not the Italian nation but Italians as a people/ethnicity, they are an ethnicity only after the fall of Roman Empire and the settlement and assimilation of Germanic peoples (mostly Longobards). The French, the Spanish, the Portuguese and Romanians are equaly descendants of Romans, Italians have nothing special except the fact Rome was situated in Italy.
Last edited by CiviC; August 27, 2009 at 12:01 AM.
The Armenian Issuehttp://www.twcenter.net/forums/group.php?groupid=1930
"We're nice mainly because we're rich and comfortable."
The Answer is obviously China.
3(5) out of 5 of the most deadly wars are in China. With the other two being the Second World War, where China comes 2nd to total casualties with 20 millions, 3 million less then the Soviet Union, and the other conflict being the Mongol invasion which also took place in China.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of..._by_death_toll
hebrews flawless victory
/thread
Well, from birth to modern times?
the USA.
in the 20th century i cant name a decade that America wasn't at war or sending soldiers into battle.the 19th century almost similarly, indian wars, civil war, war with mexico. all that in the 200 odd years this nation was concieved.
The same can be said of almost every major world power - UK, Germany, Russia, China, Japan, France, etc. Even up-and-coming countries like India have seen a far amount of bloodshed in the last 50 years.
And the US still has not run up anywhere near the bodycounts that Stalin or Hitler did during WW II.
China, from the beginning of civilisation to modern era, the central plain was never free from the ravages of war.
I think your response is more borne from America hate than anything else, because it is a quite uneducated response to think that China's 4,000 year history rife with (quite awesome) dynastic struggles and ethnic war (not to mention oh my Mao!) hasn't been more bloody than roughly 100 years of American westward expansion and 100 years of world policing. I wish I had more time to study Chinese history, I'd love to know the ins and outs of it all.
We can compare American atrocities to other bloodfilled events of a similiar nature and understand more fully that America's history pales in comparison to older nations. One of Aushwitz's five crematoria would process 1,000 people per day whereas during the trail of tears 4,000 died over the course of the journey.
Of course, we can't discount the pogroms and gulags. Russia may come in third after China and Japan.