What nation has the most interesting history?
I personally would pick Britain.
America
Britain
France
Egypt
Greece
Italy
China
Japan
Germany
India
Russia
Other ( specify )
What nation has the most interesting history?
I personally would pick Britain.
Last edited by EireEmerald; August 24, 2009 at 05:39 PM.
Italy
Italy. Roman Empire, Dark Ages, Medieval times, Renaissance and then slowly but steadily they've fell into obscurity![]()
How the hell would you measure interest worthiness even remotely objectively?
Some day I'll actually write all the reviews I keep promising...
Last edited by gaius valerius; August 25, 2009 at 05:29 AM.
Patronised by Voltaire le Philosophe
Therefore One hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the most skillful. Seizing the enemy without fighting is the most skillful. War is of vital importance to the state and should not be engaged carelessly... - Sun Tzu
Orochimaru & Aizen you must Die!! Bankai Dattebayo!!
So now you know what he thinks and what he has studied and learned do you?
I choose Britain because that history is the most important to me. If I was going for pure academic enjoyment I find the history of Russia and it's constituent geographic areas and peoples interesting.
Anyone who votes America deserves to be shot.
“The nation that will insist upon drawing a broad line of demarcation between the fighting man and the thinking man is liable to find its fighting done by fools and its thinking by cowards.”
—Sir William Francis Butler
The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. - James Madison
Well, from 1917 on that is. Prior to that it was kinda ''buy land, buy land, kill injuns, war with Britain, buy land, buyland, kill more injuns, civil war, buy, buy land, kill even more injuns, kick latino ass, industrialisation, conquer land, WWI.''
It's more interesting in detail, but from a perspective it isn't really as awesome as that of, say, Germany.
Originally Posted by A.J.P. Taylor
Originally Posted by Miel Cools
Cò am Fear am measg ant-sluaigh,
A mhaireas buan gu bràth?
Chan eil sinn uileadh ach air chuart,
Mar dhìthein buaile fàs,Bheir siantannan na bliadhna sìos,'S nach tog a' ghrian an àird.
Originally Posted by Jörg Friedrich
Originally Posted by Louis Napoleon III, Des Idees Napoleoniennes
Originally Posted by Wolfgang Held
Jajem ssoref is m'n korewE goochem mit e wenk, e nar mit e shtompWer niks is, hot kawsones
I'm surprised that Britain got so many votes and Egypt got so few. Don't get me wrong the British Isles certainly have an interesting history, but for amount of written history alone, Egypt should be #1, along with China. The ancient Egyptians, Persian Empire, Ptolemies, and later the great Muslim empires like the Fatimids, Ayyubids, and Mamluks. A throughly interesting history that spans thousands of years. Egypt is my pick.
Totally agree with you
I vote for Greece.
The roman empire would not have existed if Greece hadn't developed the techologies,the art of writting(Latin is originated from greek)
I have to admit,though,that the first position goes to china and greece to and then the romans with the egyptians.
If all these civilazations wouldn't have existed our world would be very different
But due to the fact i am a fan of history i have to admit that all those nations(except india)have an interesting history.
Even America(Independence War),Britain(medieval times-Hunderd Years War,Modern age-East India company) etc
Last edited by Andrew1994; August 31, 2009 at 05:18 AM.
No, I mean your idea of Irish history is based on traditionalism, not history.